Todd D A, Boyd J, Lloyd J, John E
Department of Neonatology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
J Paediatr Child Health. 2001 Oct;37(5):489-94. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1754.2001.00750.x.
To determine the inspired gas humidity during mechanical ventilation with: (i) four different humidification chambers; (ii) two airway temperature probe (ATP) positions; (iii) five different humidicrib temperatures; and (iv) insulating the inspiratory limb with bubble wrap.
An observational study in the Neonatal Laboratory and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Westmead Hospital. The humidity of the inspired gas was measured at the proximal end of the endotracheal tube (ETT) during mechanical ventilation. Inspired humidity measurements were made with four different humidification chambers (Fisher & Paykel (F&P Healthcare Pty Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand) auto refill MR290. F&P manual refill MR310, Suruga (Suruga Inc. Humidifiers, Vincent Medical, Dongguan, China) manual refill MI-20 and MI-10F) with the humidity control (relative humidity setting) set at - 2. Measurements were made with the ATP positioned either; (A) at the distal end of the inspiratory tube inside the humidicrib or (B) outside the humidicrib 50 cm proximal to the ETT. The inspired gas temperatures were set at 36.5 degrees C and at 39.0 degrees C, respectively. For each of the different humidification chambers and ATP positions, inspired humidity measurements were made with the humidicrib temperature set at 30.8, 32.9, 35.2, 36.2, or 37.2 degrees C. Two further sets of measurements were made, one with the inspiratory limb insulated with bubble wrap and the second set without bubble wrap.
There were significant differences in inspired humidity with the four humidification chambers at both ATP positions at all humidicrib temperatures. Both Suruga humidification chambers produced significantly higher inspired gas humidities under most conditions. Positioning the ATP outside the humidicrib produced significantly higher inspired gas humidities than with the ATP inside the humidicrib. Insulating the inspiratory tubing with bubble wrap also significantly improved the inspired gas humidity.
Significant differences in inspired gas humidity were found with the humidification chambers tested. The position of the ATP and the set temperature had a significant impact on the absolute humidity of the inspired gas. In general, higher inspired gas humidities were obtained with the ATP outside the humidicrib. However, condensation of water close to the ETT appeared at low humidicrib temperatures (< 36.2 degrees C) with the ATP outside the humidicrib and extreme care should be taken that particulate water does not enter the lungs under these conditions.
确定在机械通气期间使用以下设备时的吸入气体湿度:(i) 四种不同的湿化器;(ii) 两个气道温度探头(ATP)位置;(iii) 五种不同的湿化箱温度;以及(iv) 用气泡膜包裹吸气支路。
在韦斯特米德医院新生儿实验室和新生儿重症监护病房进行的一项观察性研究。在机械通气期间,于气管内导管(ETT)近端测量吸入气体的湿度。使用四种不同的湿化器(费雪派克(Fisher & Paykel,新西兰奥克兰F&P Healthcare Pty Ltd)自动补水MR290、F&P手动补水MR310、日本Suruga(日本Suruga Inc.加湿器,中国东莞永胜医疗Vincent Medical)手动补水MI - 20和MI - 10F)进行吸入湿度测量,湿度控制(相对湿度设置)设为 - 2。ATP放置于以下位置之一进行测量:(A) 湿化箱内吸气管道远端;或(B) 湿化箱外ETT近端50 cm处。吸入气体温度分别设为36.5摄氏度和39.0摄氏度。对于每种不同的湿化器和ATP位置,在湿化箱温度设为30.8、32.9、35.2、36.2或37.2摄氏度时进行吸入湿度测量。还进行了另外两组测量,一组用气泡膜包裹吸气支路,另一组不包裹气泡膜。
在所有湿化箱温度下,两个ATP位置处的四种湿化器在吸入湿度方面均存在显著差异。在大多数情况下,两种Suruga湿化器产生的吸入气体湿度显著更高。将ATP置于湿化箱外时产生的吸入气体湿度显著高于置于湿化箱内时。用气泡膜包裹吸气管道也显著提高了吸入气体湿度。
在所测试的湿化器中发现吸入气体湿度存在显著差异。ATP的位置和设定温度对吸入气体的绝对湿度有显著影响。一般来说,ATP置于湿化箱外时可获得更高的吸入气体湿度。然而,当ATP置于湿化箱外且湿化箱温度较低(< 36.2摄氏度)时,ETT附近会出现水凝结,在这些情况下应格外小心,防止颗粒状水进入肺部。