Schantz P M, Cruz-Reyes A, Colli C, Lord R D
Tropenmed Parasitol. 1975 Sep;26(3):334-44.
Dogs were fed larvae of Echinococcus granulosus (Batsch, 1786) recovered from sheep in Argentina. The morphological characteristics of strobilae recovered from dogs at 28, 60 and 76 days postexposure were compared with those of Echinococcus spp. recovered from naturally infected foxes, Dusicyon clupaeus (Molina) and D. griseus (Gray), and those of worms reared in dogs from larvae in European hares, Lepus europaeus (L.). Only slight differences were observed in characters of taxonomic importance and it was concluded that all cestodes represented a single species, E. granulosus. The results are discussed as they bear on the speciation controversy and the potential epidemiology importance of Dusicyon spp. as hosts of E. granulosus. It was suggested that E. patagonicus Szidat, 1960 previously described from D. culpaeus is conspecific with E. granulosus. E. cepanzoi Szidat, 1971 is probably also a synonym of E. granulosus and the subspecies E. g. dusicyontis Blood and Lelijveld, 1969, is rejected on the grounds that there is no evidence for host specificity and ecological or other segregation from the nominate form. Foxes appear to become infected from scavenging on dead sheep in localities where E. granulosus is endemic in domestic animals. There is still no evidence that E. granulosus is maintained in Argentina in sylvatic cycles.
给狗喂食从阿根廷绵羊体内采集的细粒棘球绦虫(Batsch,1786)幼虫。将暴露后28天、60天和76天从狗体内回收的节片形态特征与从自然感染的狐狸(杜氏狐,Molina和灰狐,Gray)体内回收的棘球绦虫属的形态特征,以及在狗体内由欧洲野兔(Lepus europaeus,L.)幼虫培育出的虫体形态特征进行比较。在具有分类学重要性的特征方面仅观察到细微差异,得出结论认为所有绦虫均代表单一物种,即细粒棘球绦虫。讨论了这些结果与物种形成争议以及杜氏狐属作为细粒棘球绦虫宿主的潜在流行病学重要性之间的关系。有人认为,先前从杜氏狐描述的1960年的巴塔哥尼亚棘球绦虫与细粒棘球绦虫同种。1971年的塞潘佐伊棘球绦虫可能也是细粒棘球绦虫的同义词,1969年的细粒棘球绦虫杜氏亚种Blood和Lelijveld被否定,理由是没有证据表明其具有宿主特异性,也没有证据表明其与指名亚种在生态或其他方面存在隔离。狐狸似乎是在细粒棘球绦虫在家畜中地方性流行的地区因 scavenging(原文此处单词有误,推测可能是scavenging,意为“ scavenging”)死羊而受到感染。仍然没有证据表明细粒棘球绦虫在阿根廷以野生动物循环方式存在。