MacDonald-Wilson Kim L, Rogers E Sally, Massaro Joseph M, Lyass Asya, Crean Tim
Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Boston University, MA 02215, USA.
Community Ment Health J. 2002 Feb;38(1):35-50. doi: 10.1023/a:1013955830779.
Despite the requirement of many employers to provide accommodations in the workplace for individuals with disabilities under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the preponderance of accommodations that have been described in the literature concern physical rather than psychiatric disabilities. This study was an exploratory, descriptive, longitudinal, multi-site investigation of reasonable workplace accommodations for individuals with psychiatric disabilities involved in supported employment programs. We discuss the functional limitations and reasonable accommodations provided to 191 participants and the characteristics of 204 employers and 22 service provider organizations participating in the study. Implications for service providers and administrators in supported employment programs are discussed.
尽管根据1973年《康复法案》第504条,许多雇主被要求在工作场所为残疾人士提供便利,但文献中所描述的便利措施大多涉及身体残疾而非精神残疾。本研究是一项探索性、描述性、纵向、多地点的调查,旨在研究参与支持性就业项目的精神残疾人士在工作场所的合理便利措施。我们讨论了为191名参与者提供的功能限制和合理便利,以及参与该研究的204名雇主和22个服务提供商组织的特征。还讨论了对支持性就业项目中的服务提供商和管理人员的启示。