Gutman G M, Stark A, Donald A, Beattie B L
Gerontology Research Centre, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2001;13 Supp 1:223-31. doi: 10.1017/s1041610202008165.
Cross-sectional data from Phase 1 of the Canadian Study of Health and Aging was used to examine the relationship between two self-report health measures: "How would you say your health is these days?"(HEALTH) and "How much do your health troubles stand in the way of your doing the things you want to do?"(TROUBLE). The contribution of these measures to predictive models for institutionalization and mortality is examined, using linked data from Phases 1 and 2. Their relationship to a proposed frailty measure is also examined. At CSHA-1, a majority of respondents perceived that they were in good health and did not feel that their health problems interfered with their preferred activities. At all frailty levels, a majority of both males and females rated their health as "very good" or "pretty good." As frailty increased, health problems increasingly interfered with normal activities. Logistic regression of the longitudinal data indicated that, despite their correlation, HEALTH and TROUBLE cannot act as proxies for each other. They appear to predict independently; adding one to the other significantly improved prediction of institutionalization and mortality.
“你觉得你目前的健康状况如何?”(健康状况)以及“你的健康问题在多大程度上妨碍了你做自己想做的事情?”(健康问题困扰)。利用第一阶段和第二阶段的关联数据,研究了这些指标对机构化和死亡率预测模型的贡献。还研究了它们与一种提议的虚弱度量指标之间的关系。在加拿大健康与老龄化研究第一阶段,大多数受访者认为自己健康状况良好,并且感觉自己的健康问题并未妨碍他们从事自己喜欢的活动。在所有虚弱水平上,大多数男性和女性都将自己的健康状况评为“非常好”或“相当好”。随着虚弱程度的增加,健康问题对正常活动的干扰越来越大。纵向数据的逻辑回归表明,尽管健康状况和健康问题困扰相互关联,但它们不能相互替代。它们似乎能独立进行预测;将一个指标与另一个指标相加能显著改善对机构化和死亡率的预测。