• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[循证医学中的沟通问题]

[Communication problems in evidence-based medicine].

作者信息

Sachs Lisbeth

机构信息

Tema kommunikation, Linköpings universitet, Skaraborgsinstitutet, Skövde.

出版信息

Lakartidningen. 2002 Feb 21;99(8):757-62.

PMID:11894613
Abstract

From a humanistic, social scientific perspective, the most complex task in evidence-based medicine lies in the communication of specialized medical knowledge to non-professionals. Information is never simply the neutral transmission of facts, not even when dealing with scientific knowledge and research. It is always interpreted and evaluated from a particular perspective in a specific context. That information can be neutral is thus a myth. In all medical consultations the process of communication is not just a matter of transmitting information from one who knows to one who does not. Knowledge created and formulated in a scientific context is thus recontextualised first in a clinical situation and then as an interpreted version in people's real lives. Furthermore there are difficulties when practice must be based on current research, in a situation in which no prior clinical experience exists and in which results are interpreted and used regardless of the relative certainty of current evidence.

摘要

从人文社会科学的角度来看,循证医学中最复杂的任务在于将专业医学知识传达给非专业人士。信息绝不是简单地对事实进行中立的传递,即使在涉及科学知识和研究时也是如此。它总是在特定背景下从特定视角进行解读和评估。因此,信息能够中立只是一个神话。在所有医疗咨询中,沟通的过程不仅仅是从知晓者向不知晓者传递信息。这样一来,在科学背景下产生并形成的知识首先要在临床情境中重新情境化,然后在人们的现实生活中作为一种解读版本呈现。此外,当实践必须基于当前研究时,在没有先前临床经验且无论当前证据的相对确定性如何都要对结果进行解读和应用的情况下,会存在困难。

相似文献

1
[Communication problems in evidence-based medicine].[循证医学中的沟通问题]
Lakartidningen. 2002 Feb 21;99(8):757-62.
2
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
3
[The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].[医生工作分析:宣告体外受精尝试的终结]
Encephale. 2003 Jul-Aug;29(4 Pt 1):293-305.
4
An observational study of health professionals' use of evidence to inform the development of clinical management tools.一项关于卫生专业人员利用证据为临床管理工具开发提供信息的观察性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Aug;17(16):2203-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02384.x.
5
[Informed consent in clinical practice and medical research].[临床实践和医学研究中的知情同意]
Rev Invest Clin. 2003 May-Jun;55(3):322-38.
6
Ethical communication in clinical trials. Issues faced by data managers in obtaining informed consent.临床试验中的伦理沟通。数据管理者在获取知情同意书时面临的问题。
Cancer. 2002 Dec 1;95(11):2414-21. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10994.
7
Prior experiences associated with residents' scores on a communication and interpersonal skill OSCE.与住院医师在沟通与人际技能客观结构化临床考试中的得分相关的既往经历。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Sep;62(3):368-73. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.03.004. Epub 2006 Apr 17.
8
Viewpoint: envisioning the successful integration of EBM and humanism in the clinical encounter: fantasy or fallacy?观点:展望循证医学与人文主义在临床诊疗中成功融合:幻想还是谬误?
Acad Med. 2008 Mar;83(3):268-73. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181637de4.
9
Beyond content analysis and non-verbal behaviour - what about atmosphere? A phenomenological approach.除了内容分析和非语言行为——氛围呢?一种现象学方法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Aug;67(3):319-23. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.04.009. Epub 2007 May 30.
10
Making communication research matter: what do patients notice, what do patients want, and what do patients need?让沟通研究发挥作用:患者注意到了什么、想要什么以及需要什么?
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Mar;60(3):272-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.11.003. Epub 2006 Jan 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Strategies for communicating scientific evidence on healthcare to managers and the population: a scoping review.向管理人员和公众传达医疗保健科学证据的策略:范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Jul 10;21(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01017-2.