Rey Véronique, De Martino Sonia, Espesser Robert, Habib Michel
Faculté de Médecine Nord, Université de la Méditerranée, Marseille, France.
Brain Lang. 2002 Mar;80(3):576-91. doi: 10.1006/brln.2001.2618.
The evidence of supporting phonological deficit as a cause of developmental dyslexia has been accumulating rapidly over the past 2 decades, yet the exact mechanisms underlying this deficit remain controversial. Some authors assume that a temporal processing deficit is the source of the phonological disorder observed in dyslexic children. Others maintain that the phonological deficit in dyslexia is basically linguistic, not acoustic, in nature. Three experiments were conducted and tested the impact of the temporal alteration and the impact of complex syllabic structure on consonant order judgments. Thirteen phonological dyslexics (age 10-13) and 10 controls matched for chronologial age were compared on a Temporal Order Judgment (TOJ) task using the succession of two consonants (/p/ /s/) within a cluster. In order to test the possible relevance of the temporal deficit hypothesis, the task also included two additional conditions where either the two stimuli were artificially slowed or two phonological structures were opposed (CCV and CVCV). As expected, the TOJ performance was significantly poorer in dyslexics than in controls. Moreover, in the "slowed speech" condition dyslexics' performance improved to reach the normal controls' level, whereas manipulating the phonological structure complexity provided no significant improvement. Finally dyslexics' performances, especially on the slowed condition, were found correlated with several tests of phonological processing. These results lend support to the general temporal deficit theory of dyslexia.
在过去20年里,支持语音缺陷是发展性阅读障碍病因的证据迅速增多,但这种缺陷背后的确切机制仍存在争议。一些作者认为,时间加工缺陷是诵读困难儿童中观察到的语音障碍的根源。另一些人则坚持认为,阅读障碍中的语音缺陷本质上基本上是语言性的,而非声学性的。进行了三项实验,测试了时间改变和复杂音节结构对辅音顺序判断的影响。在一项时间顺序判断(TOJ)任务中,使用一个音节群内的两个辅音(/p/ /s/)的连续出现,对13名语音诵读困难者(年龄10 - 13岁)和10名年龄匹配的对照组进行了比较。为了测试时间缺陷假说的可能相关性,该任务还包括另外两个条件,即两个刺激被人为放慢速度,或者两种语音结构相对比(CCV和CVCV)。正如预期的那样,诵读困难者的TOJ表现明显比对照组差。此外,在“放慢语速”条件下,诵读困难者的表现有所改善,达到了正常对照组的水平,而操纵语音结构复杂性并没有带来显著改善。最后发现,诵读困难者的表现,尤其是在放慢语速条件下的表现,与几项语音加工测试相关。这些结果为阅读障碍的一般时间缺陷理论提供了支持。