Feldman S
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1975 Nov;32(11):1173-5.
Urinary excretion of acetaminophen after rectal administration of three suppository formatulations obtained from hospital and commercial sources was compared to that after oral administration of a tablet dosage form. The absorption of acetaminophen from the suppositories was extremely variable and showed relative bioavailabilities of 68.4 to 87.5% when compared to the oral absorption of the drug from the tablet. The rate of bioavailability differed markedly between products and, in one case, the suppository dose of acetaminophen was so slowly absorbed that the clinical effectiveness of the product is doubtful. The study points out the need for in vivo evaluation of hospital pharmacy manufactured products.
将从医院和商业渠道获得的三种栓剂制剂直肠给药后对乙酰氨基酚的尿排泄情况与口服片剂剂型后的情况进行了比较。与从片剂口服吸收药物相比,栓剂中对乙酰氨基酚的吸收差异极大,相对生物利用度为68.4%至87.5%。不同产品之间的生物利用度速率差异显著,在一种情况下,对乙酰氨基酚的栓剂剂量吸收非常缓慢,以至于该产品的临床有效性存疑。该研究指出了对医院药房生产的产品进行体内评估的必要性。