Suppr超能文献

风险分层在美国人群未诊断糖尿病筛查中提高糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)预测效度的价值。

Value of risk stratification to increase the predictive validity of HbA1c in screening for undiagnosed diabetes in the US population.

作者信息

Ginde Adit A, Cagliero Enrico, Nathan David M, Camargo Carlos A

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Sep;23(9):1346-53. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0661-6. Epub 2008 Jun 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Opportunistic screening using hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) may improve detection of undiagnosed diabetes but remains controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the predictive validity of HbA1c as a screening test for undiagnosed diabetes in a risk-stratified sample of the US population.

DESIGN

Weighted cross-sectional analysis of diabetes risk factors, HbA1c, and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) in National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 1999-2004.

SUBJECTS

Six thousand seven hundred and twenty-three NHANES participants from morning examination session, aged > or = 18 years and without prior physician-diagnosed diabetes.

MEASUREMENTS

HbA1c and undiagnosed diabetes defined by FPG > or = 7.0 mmol/l (126 mg/dl).

RESULTS

The estimated prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes in the US population was 2.8% (5.5 million people). HbA1c had strong correlation with undiagnosed diabetes, with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.93. Independent predictors of undiagnosed diabetes were older age, male sex, black race, hypertension, elevated waist circumference, elevated triglycerides, and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. We derived a risk score for undiagnosed diabetes and stratified participants into low (0.44% prevalence), moderate (4.1% prevalence), and high (11.1% prevalence) risk subgroups. In moderate and high risk groups, a threshold HbA1c value > or = 6.1% identified patients requiring confirmatory FPG; HbA1c < or = 5.4% identified patients for whom diabetes could be reliably excluded. Intermediate HbA1c (5.5-6.0%) may exclude diabetes in moderate, but not high risk groups).

CONCLUSIONS

Risk stratification improves the predictive validity of HbA1c in screening for undiagnosed diabetes in the US population. Although opportunistic screening with HbA1c would improve detection of undiagnosed diabetes, cost-effectiveness studies are needed before implementation of specific screening strategies using HbA1c.

摘要

背景

使用糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)进行机会性筛查可能会改善未诊断糖尿病的检测,但仍存在争议。

目的

评估HbA1c作为美国人群风险分层样本中未诊断糖尿病筛查试验的预测有效性。

设计

对1999 - 2004年国家健康和营养检查调查(NHANES)中的糖尿病风险因素、HbA1c和空腹血糖(FPG)进行加权横断面分析。

研究对象

6723名来自NHANES上午检查时段的参与者,年龄≥18岁且既往无医生诊断的糖尿病。

测量指标

HbA1c和根据空腹血糖≥7.0 mmol/l(126 mg/dl)定义的未诊断糖尿病。

结果

美国人群中未诊断糖尿病的估计患病率为2.8%(550万人)。HbA1c与未诊断糖尿病有很强的相关性,受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.93。未诊断糖尿病的独立预测因素为年龄较大、男性、黑人种族、高血压、腰围增加、甘油三酯升高和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇降低。我们得出了未诊断糖尿病的风险评分,并将参与者分为低风险(患病率0.44%)、中度风险(患病率4.1%)和高风险(患病率11.1%)亚组。在中度和高风险组中,HbA1c阈值≥6.1%可识别需要进行空腹血糖确认的患者;HbA1c≤5.4%可识别可可靠排除糖尿病的患者。中间HbA1c水平(5.5 - 6.0%)可在中度风险组而非高风险组中排除糖尿病。

结论

风险分层提高了HbA1c在美国人群未诊断糖尿病筛查中的预测有效性。虽然使用HbA1c进行机会性筛查会改善未诊断糖尿病的检测,但在实施使用HbA1c的特定筛查策略之前,需要进行成本效益研究。

相似文献

1
Value of risk stratification to increase the predictive validity of HbA1c in screening for undiagnosed diabetes in the US population.
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Sep;23(9):1346-53. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0661-6. Epub 2008 Jun 10.
2
Combined use of fasting plasma glucose and glycated hemoglobin A1c in the screening of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance.
Acta Diabetol. 2010 Sep;47(3):231-6. doi: 10.1007/s00592-009-0143-2. Epub 2009 Sep 17.
4
Screening and Diagnosis of Prediabetes and Diabetes in US Children and Adolescents.
Pediatrics. 2020 Sep;146(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-0265. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
5
Prevalence of and Trends in Diabetes Among Adults in the United States, 1988-2012.
JAMA. 2015 Sep 8;314(10):1021-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.10029.
7
Trends in prevalence and control of diabetes in the United States, 1988-1994 and 1999-2010.
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Apr 15;160(8):517-25. doi: 10.7326/M13-2411.
8
Use of GHb (HbA1c) in screening for undiagnosed diabetes in the U.S. population.
Diabetes Care. 2000 Feb;23(2):187-91. doi: 10.2337/diacare.23.2.187.
9
Clinical and Public Health Implications of 2019 Endocrine Society Guidelines for Diagnosis of Diabetes in Older Adults.
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jul;43(7):1456-1461. doi: 10.2337/dc19-2467. Epub 2020 Apr 23.

引用本文的文献

1
HbA1c and brain health across the entire glycaemic spectrum.
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021 May;23(5):1140-1149. doi: 10.1111/dom.14321. Epub 2021 Feb 14.
5
Management of Hyperglycemia and Diabetes in the Emergency Department.
Curr Diab Rep. 2017 Aug;17(8):56. doi: 10.1007/s11892-017-0883-2.
8
Health literacy and blood glucose among Guyanese emergency department patients without diagnosed diabetes: a cross-sectional study.
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2015 Apr 8;7:31. doi: 10.1186/s13098-015-0028-1. eCollection 2015.

本文引用的文献

1
Utility of A1C for diabetes screening in the 1999 2004 NHANES population.
Diabetes Care. 2007 Sep;30(9):2233-5. doi: 10.2337/dc07-0585. Epub 2007 Jun 11.
2
Standards of medical care in diabetes--2007.
Diabetes Care. 2007 Jan;30 Suppl 1:S4-S41. doi: 10.2337/dc07-S004.
3
Value and significance of new diagnostic criteria of diabetes mellitus in older people.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2007 Jul-Aug;45(1):103-8. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2006.09.004. Epub 2006 Nov 30.
4
Is the measurement of glycated hemoglobin A1c alone an efficient screening test for undiagnosed diabetes? Japan National Diabetes Survey.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007 May;76(2):251-6. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2006.09.015. Epub 2006 Oct 17.
8
Utility of hemoglobin A1c in predicting diabetes risk.
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Dec;19(12):1175-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.40178.x.
9
HbA1c screening for undiagnosed diabetes in New Zealand.
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2005 Jan-Feb;21(1):65-70. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.486.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验