• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一款手动牙刷(高露洁加强型)和一款电动牙刷(高露洁声波震动牙刷)在30天内对龈上菌斑和牙龈炎的比较疗效。

Comparative efficacy on supragingival plaque and gingivitis of a manual toothbrush (Colgate Plus) and a battery-powered toothbrush (Colgate Actibrush) over a 30-day period.

作者信息

Sharma N, Galustians H J, Qaqish J G, Rustogi K N, Petrone M E, Volpe A R

机构信息

BioSci Research Canada, Ltd, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl. 2000(31):S9-13; quiz S34.

PMID:11908375
Abstract

This clinical study compared the effect of Colgate Actibrush, a battery-powered toothbrush, and Colgate Plus Diamond Head, a full-head, soft-bristled manual toothbrush, on established supragingival plaque and gingivitis over a 30-day period. Sixty-two healthy adult men and women were entered in the study. The subjects were stratified into two balanced groups according to their mean baseline plaque and gingivitis scores. Each group was randomly assigned to the use of one of the two toothbrushes. Subjects were instructed to brush their teeth at home twice daily (morning and evening) for 1 minute with their assigned toothbrush and a commercially available tooth-paste for the 30-day duration of the study. Gingivitis and plaque examinations, as well as a soft-tissue evaluation, were conducted by the same dental examiner at baseline and after 15 and 30 days of toothbrush use. Plaque and gingivitis scores were reduced significantly from baseline after the use of both toothbrushes for 30 days. However, improvement in both supragingival plaque and gingivitis scores was significantly greater in the group using Colgate Actibrush. In conclusion, although both toothbrushes provided a significant plaque and gingivitis benefit when used as part of a normal oral hygiene regimen, the efficacy of the Colgate Actibrush was demonstrated to be superior to that of the Colgate Plus Toothbrush after 30 days of use.

摘要

这项临床研究比较了电动牙刷高露洁Actibrush和全头软毛手动牙刷高露洁倍加钻石刷头牙刷在30天内对已形成的龈上菌斑和牙龈炎的影响。62名健康成年男女参与了该研究。根据他们的平均基线菌斑和牙龈炎评分,将受试者分层为两个均衡的组。每组被随机分配使用两种牙刷中的一种。受试者被指示在研究的30天内,每天在家用指定的牙刷和市售牙膏早晚各刷牙1分钟。在基线以及使用牙刷15天和30天后,由同一位牙科检查人员进行牙龈炎和菌斑检查以及软组织评估。使用两种牙刷30天后,菌斑和牙龈炎评分均较基线显著降低。然而,使用高露洁Actibrush的组在龈上菌斑和牙龈炎评分方面的改善明显更大。总之,虽然两种牙刷作为正常口腔卫生方案的一部分使用时都能显著改善菌斑和牙龈炎,但使用30天后,高露洁Actibrush的疗效被证明优于高露洁倍加牙刷。

相似文献

1
Comparative efficacy on supragingival plaque and gingivitis of a manual toothbrush (Colgate Plus) and a battery-powered toothbrush (Colgate Actibrush) over a 30-day period.一款手动牙刷(高露洁加强型)和一款电动牙刷(高露洁声波震动牙刷)在30天内对龈上菌斑和牙龈炎的比较疗效。
Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl. 2000(31):S9-13; quiz S34.
2
Comparative efficacy of Colgate Actibrush battery-powered toothbrush and Colgate Plus (manual) toothbrush on established plaque and gingivitis: a 30-day clinical study in New Jersey.高露洁电动牙刷Actibrush与高露洁加强型(手动)牙刷对已形成牙菌斑和牙龈炎的比较疗效:在新泽西州进行的一项为期30天的临床研究
Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl. 2000(31):S4-8; quiz S34.
3
Comparative efficacy of the Colgate Actibrush battery-powered toothbrush vs Oral-B CrossAction toothbrush on established plaque and gingivitis: a 6-week clinical study.高露洁电动牙刷与欧乐-B交叉动作牙刷对已形成牙菌斑和牙龈炎的比较疗效:一项为期6周的临床研究。
Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl. 2000(31):S19-24; quiz S35.
4
Comparison of gingivitis and plaque efficacy of a battery-powered toothbrush and an ADA-provided manual toothbrush.电动牙刷与美国牙科协会提供的手动牙刷在牙龈炎和牙菌斑清除效果方面的比较。
Compend Contin Educ Dent Suppl. 2000(31):S14-8; quiz S34.
5
Comparative efficacy of a new battery-powered toothbrush and a commercially available manual toothbrush on the removal of established supragingival plaque: a single-use crossover study in adults.一种新型电池驱动牙刷与市售手动牙刷在清除已形成的龈上菌斑方面的比较疗效:一项针对成年人的一次性交叉研究。
J Clin Dent. 2005;16(2):57-61.
6
Efficacy of three toothbrushes on established gingivitis and plaque.三种牙刷对已患牙龈炎和牙菌斑的疗效。
Am J Dent. 2008 Dec;21(6):339-45.
7
A clinical investigation of the efficacy of three different treatment regimens for the control of plaque and gingivitis.三种不同治疗方案控制牙菌斑和牙龈炎疗效的临床研究
J Clin Dent. 2006;17(5):138-44.
8
A 3-month clinical comparison of the safety and efficacy of two battery-operated toothbrushes: the Braun Oral-B Battery toothbrush and the Colgate Actibrush.两款电动牙刷(博朗欧乐-B电池驱动牙刷和高露洁动感牙刷)安全性和有效性的3个月临床比较。
Am J Dent. 2001 Nov;14 Spec No:13B-17B.
9
The comparative plaque removal efficacy of two advanced manual toothbrush designs in two independent clinical studies.两项独立临床研究中两种先进手动牙刷设计的相对牙菌斑清除效果。
J Clin Dent. 2001;12(3):83-6.
10
A clinical study comparing the supragingival plaque and gingivitis efficacy of a specially engineered sonic powered toothbrush with unique sensing and control technologies to a commercially available manual flat-trim toothbrush.一项临床研究,比较一款具有独特传感和控制技术的特殊设计声波电动牙刷与市售手动平切牙刷在龈上菌斑和牙龈炎治疗效果方面的差异。
J Clin Dent. 2012;23 Spec No A:A11-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Powered versus manual toothbrushing for oral health.电动牙刷与手动牙刷对口腔健康的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 17;2014(6):CD002281. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002281.pub3.