• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用贝叶斯网络评估科学证据。

Evaluation of scientific evidence using Bayesian networks.

作者信息

Garbolino Paolo, Taroni Franco

机构信息

School of Humanities, Scuola Normale Superiore, 56126 Pisa, Italy.

出版信息

Forensic Sci Int. 2002 Feb 18;125(2-3):149-55. doi: 10.1016/s0379-0738(01)00642-9.

DOI:10.1016/s0379-0738(01)00642-9
PMID:11909657
Abstract

Bayesian networks provide a valuable aid for representing epistemic relationships in a body of uncertain evidence. The paper proposes some simple Bayesian networks for standard analysis of patterns of inference concerning scientific evidence, with a discussion of the rationale behind the nets, the corresponding probabilistic formulas, and the required probability assessments.

摘要

贝叶斯网络为表示不确定证据中的认知关系提供了宝贵的帮助。本文提出了一些简单的贝叶斯网络,用于对有关科学证据的推理模式进行标准分析,并讨论了网络背后的基本原理、相应的概率公式以及所需的概率评估。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of scientific evidence using Bayesian networks.使用贝叶斯网络评估科学证据。
Forensic Sci Int. 2002 Feb 18;125(2-3):149-55. doi: 10.1016/s0379-0738(01)00642-9.
2
Implementing statistical learning methods through Bayesian networks. Part 1: a guide to Bayesian parameter estimation using forensic science data.通过贝叶斯网络实现统计学习方法。第 1 部分:使用法医学数据进行贝叶斯参数估计指南。
Forensic Sci Int. 2009 Dec 15;193(1-3):63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.09.007. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
3
DNA evidence, probabilistic evaluation and collaborative tests.
Forensic Sci Int. 2000 Feb 14;108(2):121-43. doi: 10.1016/s0379-0738(99)00197-8.
4
Assessing transfer probabilities in a Bayesian interpretation of forensic glass evidence.
Sci Justice. 1998 Jan-Mar;38(1):15-21. doi: 10.1016/s1355-0306(98)72068-4.
5
Bayesian networks for evaluating forensic DNA profiling evidence: a review and guide to literature.贝叶斯网络在法医 DNA 分析证据评估中的应用:文献综述与指南。
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2012 Mar;6(2):147-57. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2011.06.009. Epub 2011 Jul 19.
6
The likelihood approach to compare populations: a study on DNA evidence and pitfalls of intuitions.比较群体的似然性方法:关于DNA证据及直觉陷阱的研究
Sci Justice. 1999 Oct-Dec;39(4):213-22. doi: 10.1016/S1355-0306(99)72052-6.
7
DNA profiling: evaluation of the evidentiary value.DNA 图谱分析:证据价值评估
Leg Med (Tokyo). 2003 Mar;5 Suppl 1:S41-4. doi: 10.1016/s1344-6223(02)00087-1.
8
Bayesian networks of age estimation and classification based on dental evidence: A study on the third molar mineralization.基于牙齿证据的年龄估计和分类的贝叶斯网络:关于第三磨牙矿化的研究。
J Forensic Leg Med. 2018 Apr;55:23-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2018.02.005. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
9
Lies, damned lies, and DNA statistics: DNA match testing Bayes' Theorem, and the criminal courts.谎言、该死的谎言与DNA统计数据:DNA匹配测试、贝叶斯定理与刑事法庭
Med Sci Law. 2001 Jul;41(3):194-205. doi: 10.1177/002580240104100302.
10
FINEX: a Probabilistic Expert System for forensic identification.FINEX:一种用于法医鉴定的概率专家系统。
Forensic Sci Int. 2003 Jul 8;134(2-3):196-206. doi: 10.1016/s0379-0738(03)00164-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Subtleties in Bayesian decision-theoretic analysis for forensic findings: Notes on recent discussion of the role of validation study data in rational decision making.法医鉴定结果的贝叶斯决策理论分析中的微妙之处:关于验证研究数据在理性决策中作用的近期讨论笔记
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2024 Aug 31;9:100548. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100548. eCollection 2024.
2
A template Bayesian network for combining forensic evidence on an item with an uncertain relation to the disputed activities.一个模板贝叶斯网络,用于结合与争议活动存在不确定关系的物品上的法医证据。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2024 Aug 3;9:100546. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100546. eCollection 2024.
3
A collection of idioms for modeling activity level evaluations in forensic science.
法医学中用于模拟活动水平评估的一组习语。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2023 May 12;6:100331. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2023.100331. eCollection 2023.
4
The strange persistence of (source) "identification" claims in forensic literature through descriptivism, diagnosticism and machinism.(来源)“识别”主张在法医学文献中通过描述主义、诊断主义和机械主义奇怪地持续存在。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2022 Mar 2;4:100222. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100222. eCollection 2022.
5
Detangling complex relationships in forensic data: principles and use of causal networks and their application to clinical forensic science.梳理法医数据中的复杂关系:因果网络的原理、用途及其在临床法医学中的应用
Int J Legal Med. 2015 Sep;129(5):1163-72. doi: 10.1007/s00414-015-1164-8. Epub 2015 Mar 18.