De Potter T, Flamen P, Van Cutsem E, Penninckx F, Filez L, Bormans G, Maes A, Mortelmans L
Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Leuven (KU Leuven), Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002 Apr;29(4):525-9. doi: 10.1007/s00259-001-0743-8. Epub 2002 Feb 23.
This retrospective study was designed to assess the accuracy of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in diagnosing recurrence of gastric cancer. Thirty-three patients who had received surgical treatment for gastric cancer with curative intent and who had subsequently undergone FDG-PET for suspected recurrence were retrieved from the PET database. All patients were reviewed with full knowledge of prior conventional diagnostic work-up. Results were compared with a gold standard, consisting of histological confirmation or radiological and clinical follow-up. The gold standard established disease recurrence in 20/33 patients (prevalence 61%). Sensitivity and specificity of FDG-PET for the diagnosis of recurrence were 70% (14/20) and 69% (9/13), respectively. Positive and negative predictive values were 78% (14/18) and 60% (9/15), respectively. Of the six false-negative cases, all had intra-abdominal lesions (three had generalised abdominal metastases, one liver metastasis, one local recurrence and one ovarian metastasis). In the subgroup with previous signet cell differentiation of the primary tumour ( n=13, disease prevalence 62%), sensitivity was 62% (5/8) and specificity, 60% (3/5). Survival analysis for the entire patient group using Kaplan-Meier statistics yielded a longer survival in the PET-negative group (mean+/-SD, 21.9+/-19.0 months) than in the PET-positive group (mean+/-SD, 9.2+/-8.2 months) ( P=0.01). In the patient group with proven recurrence ( n=20), the mean survival for the PET-negative group was 18.5 (+/-12.5) months, as compared with 6.9 (+/-6.5) months for the PET-positive group ( P=0.05). Because of its poor sensitivity and low negative predictive value, FDG-PET is not suited for screening purposes in the follow-up of treated gastric cancer. However, FDG-PET appears to provide important additional information concerning the prognosis of recurrent gastric cancer.
本回顾性研究旨在评估氟-18氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描(FDG-PET)诊断胃癌复发的准确性。从PET数据库中检索出33例接受了胃癌根治性手术治疗且随后因怀疑复发而接受FDG-PET检查的患者。所有患者均在充分了解先前传统诊断检查结果的情况下接受复查。将结果与金标准进行比较,金标准包括组织学确诊或影像学及临床随访。金标准确定20/33例患者出现疾病复发(患病率61%)。FDG-PET诊断复发的敏感性和特异性分别为70%(14/20)和69%(9/13)。阳性和阴性预测值分别为78%(14/18)和60%(9/15)。在6例假阴性病例中,所有病例均有腹腔内病变(3例有广泛腹腔转移,1例肝转移,1例局部复发,1例卵巢转移)。在原发肿瘤先前有印戒细胞分化的亚组(n=13,疾病患病率62%)中,敏感性为62%(5/8),特异性为60%(3/5)。使用Kaplan-Meier统计方法对整个患者组进行生存分析显示,PET阴性组的生存期(均值±标准差,21.9±19.0个月)长于PET阳性组(均值±标准差,9.2±8.2个月)(P=0.01)。在已证实复发的患者组(n=20)中,PET阴性组的平均生存期为18.5(±12.5)个月,而PET阳性组为6.9(±6.5)个月(P=0.05)。由于其敏感性差和阴性预测值低,FDG-PET不适合用于胃癌治疗后随访的筛查目的。然而,FDG-PET似乎能提供有关复发性胃癌预后的重要额外信息。