Mélèse Lucien
Société de Psychanalyse Freudienne, Paris.
Am J Psychoanal. 2002 Mar;62(1):65-81. doi: 10.1023/a:1017968224129.
This paper examines Balint and Lacan's views about regression and symbolism, language, and transference. The author points out their similarities, their differences, and then proposes a synthesis through his approach of history, genealogy, trauma, and crisis. Freud's notions of masochism, of fixation (innate or phylogenetic) may thus be renewed, leading to the analyst's capacity to cope with deep regression and borderline (Balint) psychosis and perversion (Lacan) or to psychosomatics, including epilepsy.
本文考察了巴林特和拉康关于退行、象征、语言及移情的观点。作者指出了他们观点的异同,然后通过其对历史、谱系、创伤和危机的研究方法提出了一种综合观点。由此,弗洛伊德关于受虐癖、固着(先天的或种系发生的)的观念可能会得到更新,这使得分析师有能力应对深度退行以及边缘性(巴林特)精神病和变态(拉康),或应对包括癫痫在内的心身疾病。