Matherne M M, Thomas A
Department of Psychology, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston 71272, USA.
Adolescence. 2001 Winter;36(144):655-64.
Efforts to decrease delinquency have led many researchers to study the underlying factors that lead youth to engage in delinquent acts. Webber (1997) has suggested that studies of delinquency can be categorized into those positing societal, individual, and/or family etiologies. The current research investigated the latter by assessing the relationship between family environment and delinquency. One hundred twenty-seven 9th-grade students completed the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales (FACES III; Olson, Portner, & Lavee, 1985) and a modified version of Elliot and Ageton's (1980) Self-Report Delinquency Scale. Results indicated that the relationship between the two scales was moderated by family status (traditional versus nontraditional). The cohesiveness of the family successfully predicted the frequency of delinquent acts for nontraditional families, but failed to predict delinquency for traditional families. Implications for counselors, educators, and parents are discussed.
为减少青少年犯罪所做的努力促使许多研究人员去研究导致青少年实施犯罪行为的潜在因素。韦伯(1997年)提出,对青少年犯罪的研究可分为那些假定社会、个人和/或家庭病因的研究。当前的研究通过评估家庭环境与青少年犯罪之间的关系来调查后者。127名九年级学生完成了家庭适应性和凝聚力评估量表(FACES III;奥尔森、波特纳和拉维,1985年)以及埃利奥特和阿热顿(1980年)的自我报告犯罪量表的修改版。结果表明,这两个量表之间的关系受到家庭状况(传统家庭与非传统家庭)的调节。家庭凝聚力成功预测了非传统家庭中犯罪行为的频率,但未能预测传统家庭中的犯罪情况。文中讨论了对咨询师、教育工作者和家长的启示。