• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血液透析与腹膜透析的比较——一项成本效用分析。

Comparison of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis--a cost-utility analysis.

作者信息

Sennfält Karin, Magnusson Martin, Carlsson Per

机构信息

Center for Medical Technology Assessment, Linköping University, Sweden.

出版信息

Perit Dial Int. 2002 Jan-Feb;22(1):39-47.

PMID:11929142
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to compare both health-related quality of life and costs for hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) in a defined population.

DESIGN

Decision-tree modeling to estimate total costs and effects for two treatment strategies, HD and PD, among patients with chronic kidney failure, for 5 years following the start of treatment. Courses of events and health-care consumption were mapped in a retrospective matched-record study. Data on health status were obtained from a matched population by a quality-of-life questionnaire (EuroQol). The study has a societal perspective.

SETTING

All dialysis departments in the southeastern health-care region of Sweden.

PATIENTS

136 patients with kidney failure, comprising 68 matched pairs, were included in a retrospective record study; 81 patients with kidney failure, comprising 27 matched triplets, were included in a prospective questionnaire study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Cost per life year and cost per quality-adjusted life year.

RESULTS

The cost per quality-adjusted life year for PD was lower in all analyzed age groups. There was a 12% difference in the age group 21-40 years, a 31% difference in the age group 41-60 years, and an 11% difference in the age group 61+ years. Peritoneal dialysis and HD resulted in similar frequencies of transplantation (50% and 41%, respectively) and expected survival (3.58 years and 3.56 years, respectively) during the first 5 years after the initiation of treatment.

CONCLUSION

The cost-utility ratio is most favorable for PD as the primary method of treatment for patients eligible for both PD and HD.

摘要

目的

我们的目的是比较特定人群中血液透析(HD)和腹膜透析(PD)的健康相关生活质量和成本。

设计

决策树建模,以估计慢性肾衰竭患者在开始治疗后的5年中,HD和PD这两种治疗策略的总成本和效果。在一项回顾性匹配记录研究中描绘了事件过程和医疗保健消耗情况。通过生活质量问卷(欧洲五维度健康量表)从匹配人群中获取健康状况数据。该研究采用社会视角。

地点

瑞典东南部医疗保健地区的所有透析科室。

患者

136例肾衰竭患者,包括68对匹配对,纳入回顾性记录研究;81例肾衰竭患者,包括27个匹配三胞胎,纳入前瞻性问卷调查研究。

主要观察指标

每生命年成本和每质量调整生命年成本。

结果

在所有分析的年龄组中,PD的每质量调整生命年成本较低。在21 - 40岁年龄组中差异为12%,在41 - 60岁年龄组中差异为31%,在61岁及以上年龄组中差异为11%。在开始治疗后的前5年中,腹膜透析和血液透析导致的移植频率相似(分别为50%和41%),预期生存期相似(分别为3.58年和3.56年)。

结论

对于有条件选择PD和HD的患者,成本效益比最有利于将PD作为主要治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Comparison of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis--a cost-utility analysis.血液透析与腹膜透析的比较——一项成本效用分析。
Perit Dial Int. 2002 Jan-Feb;22(1):39-47.
2
Cost-effectiveness of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis: A national cohort study with 14 years follow-up and matched for comorbidities and propensity score.血液透析和腹膜透析的成本效益:一项长达14年随访且根据合并症和倾向评分进行匹配的全国队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 27;6:30266. doi: 10.1038/srep30266.
3
Economic evaluation of palliative management versus peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis for end-stage renal disease: evidence for coverage decisions in Thailand.终末期肾病姑息治疗与腹膜透析和血液透析的经济学评估:泰国医保覆盖决策的证据
Value Health. 2007 Jan-Feb;10(1):61-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2006.00145.x.
4
Cost-effectiveness of haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis for patients with end-stage renal disease in Singapore.新加坡终末期肾病患者血液透析和腹膜透析的成本效益
Nephrology (Carlton). 2016 Aug;21(8):669-77. doi: 10.1111/nep.12668.
5
Lifetime cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line dialysis modalities for patients with end-stage renal disease under peritoneal dialysis first policy.腹膜透析优先政策下终末期肾病患者一线透析方式的终身成本效益分析
BMC Nephrol. 2020 Feb 4;21(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12882-020-1708-0.
6
Health care costs of peritoneal dialysis technique failure and dialysis modality switching.腹膜透析技术失败和透析方式转换的医疗保健费用。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2013 Jan;61(1):104-11. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.07.010. Epub 2012 Aug 15.
7
Hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis, which is cost-effective?血液透析与腹膜透析,哪种更具成本效益?
Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2015 Sep;26(5):962-5. doi: 10.4103/1319-2442.164578.
8
Cost comparison of peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis in end-stage renal disease.终末期肾病患者腹膜透析与血液透析的成本比较
Am J Manag Care. 2009 Aug;15(8):509-18.
9
A cost evaluation of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis in the treatment of end-stage renal disease in Sao Paulo, Brazil.巴西圣保罗地区腹膜透析和血液透析治疗终末期肾病的成本评估。
Perit Dial Int. 2013 May-Jun;33(3):304-15. doi: 10.3747/pdi.2011.00138. Epub 2012 Dec 3.
10
Cost-Utility Analysis Using EQ-5D-5L Data: Does How the Utilities Are Derived Matter?基于 EQ-5D-5L 数据的成本效用分析:效用值的计算方法是否重要?
Value Health. 2019 Jan;22(1):45-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.05.008. Epub 2018 Jul 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Economic burden of end stage renal disease: a case study in southern Iran.终末期肾病的经济负担:伊朗南部的一个案例研究。
Health Econ Rev. 2025 Jun 16;15(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13561-025-00647-2.
2
Value of interventional radiology and their contributions to modern medical systems.介入放射学的价值及其对现代医疗系统的贡献。
Front Radiol. 2024 Jul 17;4:1403761. doi: 10.3389/fradi.2024.1403761. eCollection 2024.
3
Management of patients with heart failure and chronic kidney disease.心力衰竭和慢性肾脏病患者的管理。
Heart Fail Rev. 2024 Sep;29(5):989-1023. doi: 10.1007/s10741-024-10415-9. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
4
Hyperkalemia in chronic kidney disease patients with and without heart failure: an Italian economic modelling study.合并或未合并心力衰竭的慢性肾脏病患者的高钾血症:一项意大利经济模型研究
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2024 May 21;22(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12962-024-00547-y.
5
A cost-effectiveness analysis of patiromer in the UK: evaluation of hyperkalaemia treatment and lifelong RAASi maintenance in chronic kidney disease patients with and without heart failure.在英国进行帕替罗默的成本效益分析:评估心力衰竭和无心力衰竭的慢性肾脏病患者中高钾血症的治疗和终生 RAASi 维持。
BMC Nephrol. 2023 Mar 9;24(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12882-023-03088-3.
6
Artificial intelligence in peritoneal dialysis: general overview.人工智能在腹膜透析中的应用:概述。
Ren Fail. 2022 Dec;44(1):682-687. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2022.2064304.
7
The Cost-Effectiveness of Kidney Replacement Therapy Modalities: A Systematic Review of Full Economic Evaluations.肾脏替代治疗模式的成本效益:全经济评估的系统评价。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2021 Mar;19(2):163-180. doi: 10.1007/s40258-020-00614-4. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
8
Lifetime cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line dialysis modalities for patients with end-stage renal disease under peritoneal dialysis first policy.腹膜透析优先政策下终末期肾病患者一线透析方式的终身成本效益分析
BMC Nephrol. 2020 Feb 4;21(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12882-020-1708-0.
9
Economic Modelling of Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Literature Review to Inform Conceptual Model Design.慢性肾脏病的经济建模:系统文献综述为概念模型设计提供信息。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Dec;37(12):1451-1468. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00835-z.
10
Nephrology in South Africa: Not Yet .南非的肾脏病学:尚未成熟。
Kidney Dis (Basel). 2019 Jun;5(3):189-196. doi: 10.1159/000497324. Epub 2019 Mar 22.