Suppr超能文献

水凝胶敷料与藻酸盐敷料用于开放性急性外科伤口的比较。

A comparison of hydrofibre and alginate dressings on open acute surgical wounds.

作者信息

Foster L, Moore P, Clark S

机构信息

Department of Effective Health Care, Scunthorpe and Goole Hospitals NHS Trust, UK.

出版信息

J Wound Care. 2000 Oct;9(9):442-5. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2000.9.9.442.

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the performance of a hydrofibre (Aquacel) and an alginate (Sorbsan) dressing on acute surgical wounds left to heal by secondary intention. A total of 100 patients were prospectively randomised pre-operatively to receive either the hydrofibre or the alginate dressing. Dressing performance was measured at operation, at 24 hours and seven days. Parameters measured included ease of: application and removal of the first dressing; re-application on the first postoperative day; and removal and re-application one week postoperatively. The hydrofibre dressing received higher scores for all of these categories. Patients in this group also experienced less pain (mild or none) on removal of the first dressing and at one week. However, these results did not achieve statistical significance, and should be seen as a trend. Nevertheless, the authors recommend the use of hydrofibre dressings on open acute surgical wounds.

摘要

本研究旨在比较水凝胶纤维敷料(爱康肤银)和藻酸盐敷料(索邦)对二期愈合的急性手术伤口的治疗效果。共有100例患者在术前被前瞻性随机分组,分别接受水凝胶纤维敷料或藻酸盐敷料。在手术时、术后24小时和术后7天测量敷料的治疗效果。测量的参数包括:首次敷料的敷用和去除是否容易;术后第一天再次敷用是否容易;术后一周去除和再次敷用是否容易。水凝胶纤维敷料在所有这些类别中得分更高。该组患者在去除首次敷料时和术后一周时也经历了较少的疼痛(轻微疼痛或无疼痛)。然而,这些结果未达到统计学显著性,应视为一种趋势。尽管如此,作者建议在开放性急性手术伤口上使用水凝胶纤维敷料。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验