• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开放性手术伤口:藻酸盐银离子抗菌敷料与湿-干纱布相比如何?

Open surgical wounds: how does Aquacel compare with wet-to-dry gauze?

作者信息

Cohn S M, Lopez P P, Brown M, Namias N, Jackowski J, Li P, Mishkin D, Lopez J M

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Divisions of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, University of Miami School of Medicine, USA.

出版信息

J Wound Care. 2004 Jan;13(1):10-2. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2004.13.1.26556.

DOI:10.12968/jowc.2004.13.1.26556
PMID:14969020
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the healing rates of a hydrofibre dressing (Aquacel) and normal wet-to-dry gauze in the treatment of open surgical wounds.

METHOD

Fifty patients with open surgical wounds were randomized to receive either saline-moistened gauze or Aquacel. The rate of wound healing was measured as ml/day (deep wounds) or cm2/day (superficial wounds) at each dressing change until an investigator blinded to the patient group diagnosed the wounds as having healed or the patient was withdrawn from the study.

RESULTS

Of the 50 patients, seven were withdrawn from the study after the first evaluation. Of the remaining 43 patients, 21 had been randomly allocated to the gauze group and 22 to the Aquacel group. For deep wounds, a mean change in the wound healing rate of 1.9 +/- 1.3 cm3/day was reported for the gauze group and 2.9 +/- 2.3 cm3/day for the Aquacel group. These results approach statistical significance (p = 0.082). For superficial wounds, the mean change in the healing rate was 1.6 +/- 1.5 cm2/day for the gauze group and 1.9 +/- 2.2 cm2/day for the Aquacel group, but this was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Aquacel appears to be at least as effective as wet-to-dry gauze in the healing of open surgical wounds.

摘要

目的

比较水凝胶敷料(爱康肤银)与普通湿-干纱布在开放性手术伤口治疗中的愈合率。

方法

50例开放性手术伤口患者被随机分为两组,分别使用生理盐水湿润的纱布或爱康肤银。每次换药时测量伤口愈合率,以毫升/天(深部伤口)或平方厘米/天(浅表伤口)为单位,直至对患者分组不知情的研究者判定伤口已愈合或患者退出研究。

结果

50例患者中,7例在首次评估后退出研究。其余43例患者中,21例被随机分配至纱布组,22例被分配至爱康肤银组。对于深部伤口,纱布组伤口愈合率平均变化为1.9±1.3立方厘米/天,爱康肤银组为2.9±2.3立方厘米/天。这些结果接近统计学显著性(p = 0.082)。对于浅表伤口,纱布组愈合率平均变化为1.6±1.5平方厘米/天,爱康肤银组为1.9±2.2平方厘米/天,但无统计学显著性。

结论

在开放性手术伤口愈合方面,爱康肤银似乎至少与湿-干纱布同样有效。

相似文献

1
Open surgical wounds: how does Aquacel compare with wet-to-dry gauze?开放性手术伤口:藻酸盐银离子抗菌敷料与湿-干纱布相比如何?
J Wound Care. 2004 Jan;13(1):10-2. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2004.13.1.26556.
2
An investigation of the benefits of Aquacel Hydrofibre wound dressing.藻酸盐银离子抗菌敷料益处的研究。
Br J Nurs. 1999;8(10):676-7, 680. doi: 10.12968/bjon.1999.8.10.6607.
3
Modelling the cost implications of using carboxymethylcellulose dressing compared with gauze in the management of surgical wounds healing by secondary intention in the US and UK.在美国和英国,对使用羧甲基纤维素敷料与纱布相比在二期愈合的手术伤口处理中的成本影响进行建模。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Feb;21(2):281-90. doi: 10.1185/030079905X25532.
4
Clinical evaluation comparing the efficacy of aquacel Ag with vaseline gauze versus 1% silver sulfadiazine cream in toxic epidermal necrolysis.比较水凝胶银敷料与凡士林纱布及1%磺胺嘧啶银乳膏治疗中毒性表皮坏死松解症疗效的临床评估
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2014 May;27(5):210-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000445919.06416.32.
5
Vacuum-assisted closure versus saline-moistened gauze in the healing of postoperative diabetic foot wounds.负压封闭引流与生理盐水湿润纱布用于糖尿病足术后伤口愈合的比较
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2000 Aug;46(8):28-32, 34.
6
Do patient and nurse outcome differences exist between 2 negative pressure wound therapy systems?两种负压伤口治疗系统在患者和护士结局方面是否存在差异?
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2012 May-Jun;39(3):259-66. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e3182487a50.
7
Clinical comparative study of aquacel and paraffin gauze dressing for split-skin donor site treatment.水凝胶敷料与石蜡油纱布用于供皮区创面治疗的临床对比研究
Ann Plast Surg. 2004 Aug;53(2):132-6. doi: 10.1097/01.sap.0000112349.42549.b3.
8
A histological comparison of acute inflammatory responses with a hydrofibre or tulle gauze dressing.水凝胶纤维敷料或薄纱敷料急性炎症反应的组织学比较
J Wound Care. 2002 Mar;11(3):113-7. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2002.11.3.26384.
9
Silver containing hydrofiber dressing promotes wound healing in paediatric patients with partial thickness burns.含银水凝胶敷料可促进小儿浅二度烧伤患者的伤口愈合。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2016 Jun;32(6):577-81. doi: 10.1007/s00383-016-3895-0. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
10
A Randomized, Controlled Trial to Assess the Effect of Topical Insulin Versus Normal Saline in Pressure Ulcer Healing.一项评估局部应用胰岛素与生理盐水对压疮愈合效果的随机对照试验。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2016 Jun;62(6):16-23.

引用本文的文献

1
Debridement for surgical wounds.外科伤口清创术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 7;5(5):CD006214. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006214.pub5.
2
Multi-disciplinary management of type 1 and 2 skin tears using a silver-based hydrofiber dressing.采用含银水胶体纤维敷贴治疗 1 型和 2 型皮肤撕脱伤的多学科管理。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Sep 15;102(37):e35112. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035112.
3
Successful topical treatment of a gunshot wound: A case report.成功的枪伤局部治疗:一例报告。
Trauma Case Rep. 2023 Feb 7;44:100787. doi: 10.1016/j.tcr.2023.100787. eCollection 2023 Apr.
4
Debridement for surgical wounds.手术伤口清创术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 5;2013(9):CD006214. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006214.pub4.
5
A review of the applications of the hydrofiber dressing with silver (Aquacel Ag) in wound care.水胶体银敷料(Aquacel Ag)在伤口护理中的应用综述。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2010 Feb 2;6:21-7.
6
Tracheal inflammatory response to bacterial cellulose dressing after surgical scarification in rabbits.兔手术划痕后气管对细菌纤维素敷料的炎症反应
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2008 Jul-Aug;74(4):512-22. doi: 10.1016/s1808-8694(15)30597-8.
7
The effect of a silver-containing Hydrofiber dressing on superficial wound bed and bacterial balance of chronic wounds.含银水凝胶敷料对慢性伤口浅表创面床及细菌平衡的影响。
Int Wound J. 2005 Dec;2(4):348-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4801.2005.00150.x.
8
Gauze packing of open surgical wounds: empirical or evidence-based practice?开放性手术伤口的纱布填塞:经验性做法还是循证实践?
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006 Jan;88(1):33-6. doi: 10.1308/003588406X83014.