• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较口腔内胶片系统和基于电荷耦合器件(CCD)系统的临床前性能。

Pre-clinical performance comparing intraoral film and CCD-based systems.

作者信息

Sommers Tracey Malarkey, Mauriello Sally M, Ludlow John B, Platin Enrique, Tyndall Donald A

机构信息

Lorain County Community College, Elyria, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

J Dent Hyg. 2002 Winter;76(1):26-33.

PMID:11935928
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare dental hygiene student radiographic performance using film and charge-coupled device (CCD) systems. Specific objectives were to compare the 1) number of technique errors, 2) error type, 3) retake frequency, and 4) learning experience using both systems.

METHODS

Twenty-eight subjects exposed two 18-projection full series, one film-based, and one CCD-based system, on a manikin. One examiner, using standardized image quality criteria, evaluated all images. Each subject was assigned to one of four focus groups. Quantitative data were analyzed using ANOVA and Wilcoxon tests. Emic expressions and percentages were used to report qualitative data with themes supported by performance data.

RESULTS

A greater number of technique errors occurred using the CCD system than the film system (p < 0.0001), with vertical angulation being the most common error (53%). Using the film-based system, 66% of the errors were due to incorrect horizontal angulation. Subjects exposed an average of 10 retakes per series using the CCD versus 3 retakes using film. Forty-four percent of the subjects felt their most common CCD errors were film placement and vertical angulation compared to 59% who believed horizontal angulation was the main technique error when using film. Difficulty placing the CCD sensor intraorally was expressed by 74%. The CCD system was reported to be beneficial for teaching theory (67%), with 59% preferring film for learning the psychomotor skill.

CONCLUSION

In pre-clinical situations, the CCD system may be an effective tool for teaching technique. Radiographic errors are dependent on the type of image receptor used.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较牙科卫生专业学生使用胶片系统和电荷耦合器件(CCD)系统进行放射成像的表现。具体目标是比较:1)技术错误数量;2)错误类型;3)重拍频率;4)使用这两种系统的学习体验。

方法

28名受试者在人体模型上分别使用基于胶片的系统和基于CCD的系统拍摄两组各18张投照的全口系列影像。由一名检查者依据标准化的图像质量标准对所有影像进行评估。每位受试者被分配到四个焦点小组之一。定量数据采用方差分析和威尔科克森检验进行分析。采用主位表达和百分比报告定性数据,并辅以表现数据支持的主题。

结果

与胶片系统相比,使用CCD系统出现的技术错误更多(p < 0.0001),垂直角度错误最为常见(53%)。在基于胶片的系统中,66%的错误是由于水平角度不正确。使用CCD系统时,受试者每组平均重拍10次,而使用胶片时平均重拍3次。44%的受试者认为他们在使用CCD时最常见的错误是传感器放置和垂直角度,相比之下,59%的受试者认为使用胶片时主要的技术错误是水平角度。74%的受试者表示将CCD传感器放置在口腔内有困难。据报告,CCD系统对理论教学有益(67%),59%的人更喜欢使用胶片来学习操作技能。

结论

在临床前的情况下,CCD系统可能是一种有效的技术教学工具。放射成像错误取决于所使用的图像接收器类型。

相似文献

1
Pre-clinical performance comparing intraoral film and CCD-based systems.比较口腔内胶片系统和基于电荷耦合器件(CCD)系统的临床前性能。
J Dent Hyg. 2002 Winter;76(1):26-33.
2
Comparison of technique errors of intraoral radiographs taken on film v photostimulable phosphor (PSP) plates.胶片与光激励荧光体(PSP)板口腔内X线片技术误差的比较。
Tex Dent J. 2012 Jun;129(6):589-96.
3
Intraoral radiology in general dental practices - a comparison of digital and film-based X-ray systems with regard to radiation protection and dose reduction.一般牙科诊所中的口腔放射学——数字和基于胶片的X射线系统在辐射防护和剂量降低方面的比较。
Rofo. 2014 Aug;186(8):762-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1366256. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
4
Technical Performance of Universal and Enhanced Intraoral Imaging Rectangular Collimators.通用型和增强型口腔内成像矩形准直器的技术性能
J Dent Hyg. 2015 Aug;89(4):238-46.
5
A Comparison of Technique Errors using Two Radiographic Intra-oral Receptor-holding Devices.使用两种口腔内X光接收器固定装置的技术误差比较。
J Dent Hyg. 2015 Dec;89(6):384-9.
6
An evaluation of periapical radiography with a charge-coupled device.使用电荷耦合器件对根尖周放射摄影进行的评估。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1998 Mar;27(2):97-101. doi: 10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600330.
7
Integrating photo-stimulable phosphor plates into dental and dental hygiene radiography curricula.将光激励磷光体板整合到牙科和口腔卫生放射摄影课程中。
J Dent Educ. 2013 Nov;77(11):1451-60.
8
Comparison of Efficiency and Image Quality of Photostimulable Phosphor Plate and Charge-Coupled Device Receptors in Dental Radiography.比较光激励磷光体平板和电荷耦合器件探测器在牙科放射摄影中的效率和图像质量。
J Dent Educ. 2019 Oct;83(10):1205-1212. doi: 10.21815/JDE.019.120. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
9
Comparison of the efficacy and technical accuracy of different rectangular collimators for intraoral radiography.不同口腔内X线摄影矩形准直器的效能与技术准确性比较。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Jul;108(1):e22-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.03.011. Epub 2009 May 22.
10
Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography: comparison of image quality in a phantom study.数字狭缝扫描电荷耦合器件X线摄影与AMBER及滤线栅屏-片X线摄影的比较:模型研究中的图像质量对比
Radiology. 2005 Jun;235(3):857-66. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2353031919. Epub 2005 Apr 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Reject Rates of Radiographic Images in Dentomaxillofacial Radiology: A Literature Review.口腔颌面放射影像学中 X 光片的拒诊率:文献综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 30;18(15):8076. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158076.
2
The quality of radiographs accompanying endodontic referrals to a health authority clinic.转诊至卫生当局诊所进行牙髓病治疗时所附X光片的质量。
Br Dent J. 2015 Jul 24;219(2):69-72. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.557.
3
Patient discomfort in bitewing examination with film and four digital receptors.患者在使用胶片和四个数字传感器进行咬翼检查时的不适。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012 May;41(4):323-7. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/73402308.
4
Rating the extent of surface scratches on photostimulable storage phosphor plates in a dental school environment.在牙科学院环境中对光激励存储荧光板表面划痕的程度进行分级。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010 Mar;39(3):179-83. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/28972644.
5
Different digital imaging techniques in dental practice.牙科实践中的不同数字成像技术。
Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2004 May;4(2):37-40. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2004.3412.