• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

口腔颌面放射影像学中 X 光片的拒诊率:文献综述。

Reject Rates of Radiographic Images in Dentomaxillofacial Radiology: A Literature Review.

机构信息

Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Applied Oral Sciences and Community Dental Care, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 30;18(15):8076. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158076.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18158076
PMID:34360368
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8345626/
Abstract

This report surveyed the image reject rates of intra-oral, extra-oral, and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging in the academic literature. PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were queried in mid-April 2021. Manual screening of the reference lists of the identified publications was performed to identify papers missed from the database search. All publications returned by the searches were initially included. Exclusion criteria included irrelevance, no reporting of reject rate, no access to the article, and not original article. The total number of images and the number of rejects were recorded for each type of radiographic images. Factors and commonest errors associated with the rejects were recorded. Twenty-six original articles were identified and reviewed. The average reject rate was 11.25% for bitewings, 16.38% for periapicals, 4.10% for panoramics, 6.08% for lateral cephalography, and 2.77% for CBCT. Positioning error and patient movement were two common reasons for the rejects. The average reject rates computed from data pooled across studies should form the reference values for quality assurance programs to follow. Future reject analysis studies should report more radiographic parameters such as type of collimation for intra-oral radiography and patient posture for CBCT.

摘要

本报告调查了口腔内、口腔外和锥形束 CT(CBCT)成像在学术文献中的图像拒检率。2021 年 4 月中旬,在 PubMed、Web of Science 和 Scopus 数据库中进行了检索。对已确定出版物的参考文献进行了手动筛选,以确定从数据库搜索中遗漏的论文。搜索返回的所有出版物最初都被包括在内。排除标准包括不相关、未报告拒检率、无法获取文章以及不是原创文章。记录了每种类型射线照相图像的总图像数和拒检数。记录了与拒检相关的因素和最常见的错误。共确定并审查了 26 篇原始文章。磨牙片的平均拒检率为 11.25%,根尖片为 16.38%,全景片为 4.10%,侧位片为 6.08%,CBCT 为 2.77%。定位错误和患者移动是拒检的两个常见原因。从跨研究数据中计算得出的平均拒检率应成为质量保证计划遵循的参考值。未来的拒检分析研究应报告更多射线照相参数,例如口腔内射线照相的准直类型和 CBCT 的患者姿势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4be9/8345626/d2f8ea749f83/ijerph-18-08076-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4be9/8345626/d2f8ea749f83/ijerph-18-08076-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4be9/8345626/d2f8ea749f83/ijerph-18-08076-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Reject Rates of Radiographic Images in Dentomaxillofacial Radiology: A Literature Review.口腔颌面放射影像学中 X 光片的拒诊率:文献综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 30;18(15):8076. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158076.
2
Cone-beam Computed Tomography Compared with Intraoral Radiographic Lesions in Endodontic Outcome Studies: A Systematic Review.锥形束计算机断层扫描与口腔内放射学病变在牙髓治疗结局研究中的比较:系统评价。
J Endod. 2018 Nov;44(11):1626-1631. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.08.006.
3
The influence of dental implants in periapical and panoramic radiographs and cone beam computed tomography images: a clinical study.牙种植体在根尖片、全景片及锥形束计算机断层扫描图像中的影像表现:一项临床研究
Gen Dent. 2018 Mar-Apr;66(2):e1-e6.
4
Soft tissue simulant materials in X-ray-based imaging in dentomaxillofacial radiology: a scoping review.口腔颌面放射影像学中基于 X 射线的软组织模拟材料:范围综述。
Oral Radiol. 2024 Apr;40(2):109-123. doi: 10.1007/s11282-023-00721-7. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
5
Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and panoramic and periapical radiography for detection of apical periodontitis.锥形束计算机断层扫描、全景片和根尖片检测根尖周炎的准确性。
J Endod. 2008 Mar;34(3):273-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.11.023. Epub 2008 Jan 31.
6
Review of cone beam computed tomography guidelines in North America.北美锥形束计算机断层扫描指南综述。
Quintessence Int. 2019 Jan 25;50(2):136-145. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a41332. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
7
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of root perforation, external resorption and fractures using cone-beam computed tomography, panoramic radiography and conventional & digital periapical radiography.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描、全景放射摄影以及传统和数字根尖片对根管穿孔、牙根外吸收和骨折的诊断准确性比较。
Indian J Dent Res. 2015 Nov-Dec;26(6):619-26. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.176927.
8
The detection of periapical pathoses using digital periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography in endodontically retreated teeth - part 2: a 1 year post-treatment follow-up.使用数字化根尖片和锥形束计算机断层扫描检测根管再治疗牙齿的根尖周病变——第2部分:治疗后1年随访
Int Endod J. 2016 Jul;49(7):623-35. doi: 10.1111/iej.12500. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
9
Influence of cone beam computed tomography versus panoramic radiography on the surgical technique of third molar removal: a systematic review.锥形束计算机断层扫描与全景 X 光对第三磨牙拔除手术技术的影响:系统评价。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Oct;48(10):1340-1347. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 May 2.
10
Evaluation of root resorption after comprehensive orthodontic treatment using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT): a meta-analysis.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)评估综合正畸治疗后的牙根吸收:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2018 Jun 27;18(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0579-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Automated quality evaluation of dental panoramic radiographs using deep learning.使用深度学习对牙科全景X光片进行自动质量评估。
Imaging Sci Dent. 2025 Jun;55(2):175-188. doi: 10.5624/isd.20240232. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
2
Assessment of radiographic errors and repetition rates in undergraduate endodontic education: a retrospective clinical study.本科牙髓病学教育中影像学错误及重复率的评估:一项回顾性临床研究。
Saudi Dent J. 2025 Jul 1;37(4-6):26. doi: 10.1007/s44445-025-00030-1.
3
Impact of an intraoral X-ray cone with positioning laser lights on reducing radiographic errors with the bisecting angle technique: A technical report.

本文引用的文献

1
Medial Sigmoid Depression of the Mandibular Ramus as a Lesion-Mimicking Anatomical Variation: A Systematic Review.下颌支内侧斜嵴凹陷:一种似病变的解剖变异:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 17;18(8):4271. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084271.
2
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
3
Head motion and perception of discomfort by young children during simulated CBCT examinations.
配备定位激光灯的口腔内X射线锥形束对采用分角线投照技术减少放射影像误差的影响:技术报告
Imaging Sci Dent. 2025 Mar;55(1):65-71. doi: 10.5624/isd.20240196. Epub 2025 Jan 15.
4
Enhancing intraoral radiographic technique: introducing "Nallan's Lines".提高口腔内放射摄影技术:引入“纳兰线”。
Front Oral Health. 2024 Dec 20;5:1498117. doi: 10.3389/froh.2024.1498117. eCollection 2024.
5
Positioning and preparation errors impacting dental panoramic radiographs in patients with mixed dentition.混合牙列患者中影响牙科全景X线片的体位和准备错误
Imaging Sci Dent. 2024 Dec;54(4):336-344. doi: 10.5624/isd.20240062. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
6
Application of Artificial Intelligence in Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Airway Analysis: A Narrative Review.人工智能在锥形束计算机断层扫描气道分析中的应用:一篇叙述性综述。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Aug 30;14(17):1917. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14171917.
7
Effect of using different strips on reducing the most common error in panoramic imaging: A randomised controlled trial on palatoglossal air space shadow.不同条带使用对减少全景成像中最常见误差的影响:腭舌弓空气间隙阴影的随机对照试验。
J Med Radiat Sci. 2024 Jun;71(2):194-202. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.753. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
8
The Performance of Paralleling Technique and Bisecting Angle Technique for Taking Periapical Radiographs: A Systematic Review.平行投照技术与分角线投照技术用于拍摄根尖片的效果:一项系统评价
Dent J (Basel). 2023 Jun 21;11(7):155. doi: 10.3390/dj11070155.
9
Awareness and practice of dentomaxillofacial imaging among paediatric dentists: a questionnaire survey of members of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry.口腔颌面影像学在儿童牙医中的认知和实践:欧洲儿童牙科学会成员的问卷调查。
Oral Radiol. 2023 Jul;39(3):576-587. doi: 10.1007/s11282-023-00675-w. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
10
The Use of CBCT in Evaluating the Health and Pathology of the Maxillary Sinus.锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)在上颌窦健康与病变评估中的应用
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 16;12(11):2819. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12112819.
儿童在模拟 CBCT 检查过程中的头部运动和不适感知。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2021 Mar 1;50(3):20200445. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20200445. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
4
Image retake rates of cone beam computed tomography in a dental institution.锥形束计算机断层扫描在牙科机构中的重拍率。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Dec;24(12):4501-4510. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03315-3. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
5
Evaluation of motion artifacts in cone-beam computed tomography with three different patient positioning.三种不同患者定位方式下锥形束 CT 运动伪影的评估。
Oral Radiol. 2021 Apr;37(2):276-281. doi: 10.1007/s11282-020-00446-x. Epub 2020 May 20.
6
Novel low-dose protocols using cone beam computed tomography in dental medicine: a review focusing on indications, limitations, and future possibilities.新型低剂量锥形束计算机断层扫描在口腔医学中的应用:一项关注适应证、局限性和未来可能性的综述。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Jun;23(6):2573-2581. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02907-y. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
7
A reject analysis of cone-beam CTs in under-aged patients.未成年患者锥形束 CT 的 reject 分析。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019 Mar;48(3):20180138. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20180138. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
8
Re-exposure in cone beam CT of the dentomaxillofacial region: a retrospective study.口腔颌面锥形束 CT 中的再照射:一项回顾性研究。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019 Mar;48(3):20180184. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20180184. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
9
Evidence on radiation dose reduction using rectangular collimation: a systematic review.使用矩形准直器降低放射剂量的证据:系统评价。
Int Dent J. 2019 Apr;69(2):84-97. doi: 10.1111/idj.12411. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
10
Digital Intraoral Imaging Re-Exposure Rates of Dental Students.牙科学生的数字化口腔内成像再次曝光率。
J Dent Educ. 2018 Jan;82(1):61-68. doi: 10.21815/JDE.018.011.