Suppr超能文献

清洁手术中的抗生素预防:乳房手术和疝气修补术。

Antibiotic prophylaxis in clean surgery: breast surgery and hernia repair.

作者信息

D'Amico D F, Parimbelli P, Ruffolo C

机构信息

Department of Surgery and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Italy.

出版信息

J Chemother. 2001 Nov;13 Spec No 1(1):108-11. doi: 10.1179/joc.2001.13.Supplement-2.108.

Abstract

Use of prophylactic antibiotics in clean surgery is still controversial. We reviewed the literature of the last 10 years to identify the best way to approach clean surgery. The question is more important for patients undergoing breast surgery. The presence of an infected breast wound delays the beginning of postoperative adjuvant anticancer therapy: there is good evidence to suggest that delayed adjuvant therapy compromises the outcome for patients in terms of both local control and survival. There are several clinical trials that have addressed the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics for patients undergoing breast surgery and hernia repair. Platt et al assessed the efficacy of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in a clinical trial of 1218 patients undergoing clean surgery with an absolute reduction rate of 39% in wound infections. Gupta et al reported no influence on the incidence of infective complications by antibiotic prophylaxis in 357 patients undergoing elective breast surgery. Like breast surgery, use of prophylaxis in hernia repair is not clear: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of 619 patients assessed no benefit of antibiotic prophylaxis. On the other hand Lewis et al reported a 75% reduction of infections in low-risk patients when a single dose of cefotaxime was used in clean operations. A particularly interesting point is the use of prosthetic mesh in hernia repair and primary reconstructive surgery in breast surgery. Amland et al reported a significant reduction of the incidence of wound infections in a group of patients undergoing reconstructive breast surgery, receiving azithromycin vs placebo (5% vs 20%). In hernia repair we stress the need to prevent wound infections: currently Liechtestein's technique is widely performed all over the world. Mesh infection is an unpleasant event that requires prosthesis removal. The lack of conclusive studies about antibiotic prophylaxis in clean surgery suggests that a single-dose of cephalosporin at the induction of anesthesia may be prudent. This procedure is certainly inexpensive and safe and, more importantly, probably does not have an impact on antibiotic resistance.

摘要

在清洁手术中使用预防性抗生素仍存在争议。我们回顾了过去10年的文献,以确定进行清洁手术的最佳方法。这个问题对于接受乳房手术的患者更为重要。乳房伤口感染的存在会延迟术后辅助抗癌治疗的开始:有充分证据表明,延迟辅助治疗在局部控制和生存方面都会影响患者的治疗结果。有几项临床试验探讨了预防性抗生素对接受乳房手术和疝气修补术患者的疗效。普拉特等人在一项对1218例接受清洁手术患者的临床试验中评估了术前抗生素预防的疗效,伤口感染的绝对降低率为39%。古普塔等人报告称,在357例接受择期乳房手术的患者中,抗生素预防对感染性并发症的发生率没有影响。与乳房手术一样,疝气修补术中使用预防措施的情况也不明确:一项对619例患者进行的前瞻性、随机、双盲、多中心研究评估了抗生素预防并无益处。另一方面,刘易斯等人报告称,在清洁手术中使用单剂量头孢噻肟时,低风险患者的感染率降低了75%。一个特别有趣的点是在疝气修补术中使用人工补片以及在乳房手术中的一期重建手术。阿姆兰等人报告称,在一组接受乳房重建手术的患者中,接受阿奇霉素治疗与接受安慰剂治疗相比,伤口感染发生率显著降低(5%对20%)。在疝气修补术中,我们强调预防伤口感染的必要性:目前利希滕斯坦技术在全世界广泛应用。补片感染是一件令人不快的事情,需要取出假体。关于清洁手术中抗生素预防的结论性研究的缺乏表明,在麻醉诱导时使用单剂量头孢菌素可能是谨慎的做法。这个程序肯定既便宜又安全,更重要的是,可能不会对抗生素耐药性产生影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验