• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于预测压疮发生的风险评估量表:信度与效度

A risk assessment scale for the prediction of pressure sore development: reliability and validity.

作者信息

Lindgren Margareta, Unosson Mitra, Krantz Ann-Margret, Ek Anna-Christina

机构信息

Department of Medicine and Care, Division of Nursing Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping, Sweden.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 2002 Apr;38(2):190-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02163.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02163.x
PMID:11940132
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The ability to assess the risk of a patient developing pressure sores is a major issue in pressure sore prevention. Risk assessment scales should be valid, reliable and easy to use in clinical practice.

AIM

To develop further a risk assessment scale, for predicting pressure sore development and, in addition, to present the validity and reliability of this scale.

METHODS

The risk assessment pressure sore (RAPS) scale, includes 12 variables, five from the re-modified Norton scale, three from the Braden scale and three from other research results. Five hundred and thirty patients without pressure sores on admission were included in the study and assessed over a maximum period of 12 weeks. Internal consistency was examined by item analysis and equivalence by interrater reliability. To estimate equivalence, 10 pairs of nurses assessed a total of 116 patients. The underlying dimensions of the scale were examined by factor analysis. The predictive validity was examined by determination of sensitivity, specificity and predictive value.

RESULTS

Two variables were excluded as a result of low item-item and item-total correlations. The average percentage of agreement and the intraclass correlation between raters were 70% and 0.83, respectively. The factor analysis gave three factors, with a total variance explained of 65.1%. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive value were high among patients at medical and infection wards.

CONCLUSION

The RAPS scale is a reliable scale for predicting pressure sore development. The validity is especially good for patients undergoing treatment in medical wards and wards for infectious diseases. This indicates that the RAPS scale may be useful in clinical practice for these groups of patients. For patients undergoing surgical treatment, further analysis will be performed.

摘要

背景

评估患者发生压疮风险的能力是压疮预防中的一个主要问题。风险评估量表应在临床实践中有效、可靠且易于使用。

目的

进一步开发一种用于预测压疮发生的风险评估量表,并展示该量表的有效性和可靠性。

方法

压疮风险评估(RAPS)量表包括12个变量,其中5个来自重新修订的诺顿量表,3个来自布拉德恩量表,3个来自其他研究结果。纳入530例入院时无压疮的患者,最长评估12周。通过项目分析检验内部一致性,通过评分者间信度检验等效性。为评估等效性,10对护士共评估了116例患者。通过因子分析检验量表的潜在维度。通过确定敏感性、特异性和预测值来检验预测效度。

结果

由于项目间和项目与总分的相关性较低,排除了两个变量。评分者之间的平均一致百分比和组内相关系数分别为70%和0.83。因子分析得出三个因子,共解释总方差的65.1%。在内科和感染病房的患者中,敏感性、特异性和预测值较高。

结论

RAPS量表是一种可靠的预测压疮发生的量表。其有效性在接受内科治疗的患者和传染病病房的患者中尤其良好。这表明RAPS量表在临床实践中可能对这些患者群体有用。对于接受手术治疗的患者,将进行进一步分析。

相似文献

1
A risk assessment scale for the prediction of pressure sore development: reliability and validity.一种用于预测压疮发生的风险评估量表:信度与效度
J Adv Nurs. 2002 Apr;38(2):190-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02163.x.
2
Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China.在中国内地的急症医院中,使用改良版Braden量表、Braden量表和Norton量表预测压疮风险。
Appl Nurs Res. 2005 May;18(2):122-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2005.01.001.
3
An interrater reliability study of the Braden scale in two nursing homes.在两家养老院对Braden量表进行的评分者间信度研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Oct;45(10):1501-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.02.007.
4
Pressure ulcer risk assessment in critical care: interrater reliability and validity studies of the Braden and Waterlow scales and subjective ratings in two intensive care units.重症监护压力性溃疡风险评估:Braden 和 Waterlow 量表及两个重症监护病房主观评估的评分者间信度和效度研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2010 Jun;47(6):671-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.11.005. Epub 2009 Dec 8.
5
An interrater reliability study of the assessment of pressure ulcer risk using the Braden scale and the classification of pressure ulcers in a home care setting.一项在家庭护理环境中使用Braden量表评估压疮风险及压疮分类的评分者间信度研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Oct;46(10):1307-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.03.014. Epub 2009 Apr 29.
6
Predictive validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the risk assessment pressure sore scale in intensive care patients: results of a prospective study.土耳其语版重症监护患者压疮风险评估量表的预测效度和信度:一项前瞻性研究的结果
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2015 Apr;61(4):58-62.
7
Inter- and intrarater reliability of the Waterlow pressure sore risk scale: a systematic review.沃特洛压疮风险评估量表的评分者间及评分者内信度:一项系统评价
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Mar;46(3):369-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.09.010. Epub 2008 Nov 4.
8
Validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales; Cubbin and Jackson, Braden, and Douglas scale.压疮风险评估量表的有效性;库宾和杰克逊量表、布拉登量表及道格拉斯量表
Int J Nurs Stud. 2004 Feb;41(2):199-204. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7489(03)00135-4.
9
Predictive validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk in elderly residents of long-term care facilities.Braden 压疮风险评估量表对长期护理机构老年居民的预测效度。
Geriatr Nurs. 2010 Mar-Apr;31(2):95-104. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2009.11.010.
10
Predicting pressure sore risk with the Norton, Braden, and Waterlow scales in a Hong Kong rehabilitation hospital.在香港一家康复医院使用诺顿量表、布拉德恩量表和沃特洛量表预测压疮风险。
Nurs Res. 1998 May-Jun;47(3):147-53. doi: 10.1097/00006199-199805000-00005.

引用本文的文献

1
Accuracy and clinical effectiveness of risk prediction tools for pressure injury occurrence: An umbrella review.压力性损伤发生风险预测工具的准确性和临床有效性:一项伞状综述。
PLoS Med. 2025 Feb 6;22(2):e1004518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004518. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Using CT imaging to identify sarcopenia as a risk factor for severe falls in older adults.利用CT成像技术将肌肉减少症识别为老年人严重跌倒的一个风险因素。
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Feb 1;25(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05707-0.
3
Decision Support Tools in Adult Long-term Care Facilities: Scoping Review.
成人长期护理机构中的决策支持工具:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 6;24(9):e39681. doi: 10.2196/39681.
4
Provider perspectives of community-acquired pressure injury prevention in veterans with spinal cord injury.提供者对脊髓损伤退伍军人获得性压疮预防的看法。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2024 Jan;47(1):168-180. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2022.2088505. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
5
Prevalence of pressure ulcers among hospitalized adult patients in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.埃塞俄比亚住院成年患者压疮的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Dermatol. 2020 Nov 7;20(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12895-020-00112-z.
6
Self-rated health, lifestyle habits and risk assessment in 75-year-old persons attending preventive clinic visits with a nurse in primary health care: a cross-sectional study.在初级卫生保健机构中,75岁老人在护士陪同下进行预防性门诊时的自评健康、生活方式习惯及风险评估:一项横断面研究。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2019 Jul 1;20:e88. doi: 10.1017/S1463423619000136.
7
Optical coherence tomography for the investigation of skin adaptation to mechanical stress.光学相干断层扫描在皮肤对机械压力适应性研究中的应用。
Skin Res Technol. 2020 Sep;26(5):627-638. doi: 10.1111/srt.12843. Epub 2020 Mar 29.
8
Comparing the Effect of Henna Oil and Olive Oil on Pressure Ulcer Grade One in Intensive Care Units Patients.比较指甲花油和橄榄油对重症监护病房患者一期压疮的疗效。
Adv Biomed Res. 2019 Nov 27;8:68. doi: 10.4103/abr.abr_207_19. eCollection 2019.
9
Clinical evaluation of a new pressure ulcer risk assessment instrument, the Pressure Ulcer Risk Primary or Secondary Evaluation Tool (PURPOSE T).新型压疮风险评估工具——压疮风险初级或次级评估工具(PURPOSE T)的临床评估。
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Feb;74(2):407-424. doi: 10.1111/jan.13444. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
10
Using cognitive pre-testing methods in the development of a new evidenced-based pressure ulcer risk assessment instrument.在开发一种新的基于证据的压疮风险评估工具时使用认知预测试方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Nov 16;16(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0257-5.