Liberman Joshua N, Stewart Walter F, Wesnes Keith, Troncoso Juan
Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Neurology. 2002 Apr 9;58(7):1038-44. doi: 10.1212/wnl.58.7.1038.
To determine whether APOE genotype explained variability in short-term recovery from predominantly mild traumatic brain injury (TBI).
A total of 87 adult patients presenting with mild or moderate TBI to a shock trauma center were enrolled prospectively. A battery of 13 neuropsychological tests was administered twice, at approximately 3 and 6 weeks after injury. Eighty of 87 patients were successfully genotyped for APOE using a buccal swab technique.
Ninety percent of study patients had mild TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale score of 13 to 15); 18 (22.5%) had one APOE epsilon 4 and none had two epsilon 4 alleles. After adjusting for potential confounders, patients positive for the APOE epsilon 4 allele had lower mean scores on 12 of 13 neuropsychological outcomes at visit 1 compared with APOE epsilon 4-negative patients. Two of the differences were significant (grooved pegboard test, p = 0.005; paced auditory serial addition task 2.8-second trial, p = 0.004). At visit 2, APOE epsilon 4-positive patients had lower adjusted mean scores on 11 of the 13 neuropsychological outcomes. None of the differences was significant.
APOE genotype may influence the severity of the acute injury. However, with no consistent pattern to the recovery curves, it is not clear if APOE genotype influences the rate of recovery.
确定载脂蛋白E(APOE)基因型是否能解释主要为轻度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者短期恢复情况的变异性。
前瞻性纳入了87例因轻度或中度TBI就诊于休克创伤中心的成年患者。在受伤后约3周和6周时,对患者进行了一系列13项神经心理学测试,共测试两次。87例患者中有80例成功采用口腔拭子技术进行了APOE基因分型。
90%的研究患者为轻度TBI(格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分为13至15分);18例(22.5%)携带一个APOE ε4等位基因,无患者携带两个ε4等位基因。在对潜在混杂因素进行校正后,与APOE ε4阴性患者相比,APOE ε4等位基因阳性患者在首次就诊时13项神经心理学测试结果中的12项平均得分较低。其中两项差异具有统计学意义(凹槽钉板测试,p = 0.005;听觉连续加法任务2.8秒试验,p = 0.004)。在第二次就诊时,APOE ε4阳性患者在13项神经心理学测试结果中的11项校正后平均得分较低。但所有差异均无统计学意义。
APOE基因型可能影响急性损伤的严重程度。然而,由于恢复曲线没有一致的模式,目前尚不清楚APOE基因型是否会影响恢复速度。