• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

拔牙与不拔牙正畸治疗对面部影响的三维评估

Three-dimensional assessment of the effects of extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatment on the face.

作者信息

Ismail Shamique F H, Moss J P, Hennessy R

机构信息

Orthodontic Department, Dental Institute, 3rd Floor, Royal London Hospital, New Road, London E1 1BB, UK.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002 Mar;121(3):244-56. doi: 10.1067/mod.2002.121010.

DOI:10.1067/mod.2002.121010
PMID:11941338
Abstract

The purpose of this prospective study was to compare the 3-dimensional (3-D) effects on the face of extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatment in patients with skeletal Class I patterns. The sample of 24 patients included 12 whose treatment included extractions and 12 who were treated without extractions. Pretreatment study casts were assessed to evaluate dental differences between the 2 groups. Pretreatment and posttreatment lateral cephalograms and optical surface scans were also compared. In the lateral cephalometric assessment, the only significant (P <.05) pretreatment difference was lower lip length. Posttreatment, the nasolabial angle and lower lip thickness were significantly different (P <.05). Registration of the average 3-D optical surface scans indicated that, before treatment, the nonextraction group had longer and broader faces by 5 to 7 mm, and the upper lip and labiomental fold were 3 to 5 mm farther forward than in the extraction group. Posttreatment, the nonextraction group still had larger faces, but the difference was smaller. Faces in the extraction group became relatively more protrusive with treatment. The surface shape analysis technique showed that the cheeks were flatter in the nonextraction group at the start of treatment, but this reversed with time. In the extraction group, the concavity of the labiomental fold increased, while the nonextraction group showed no change in this area. The study demonstrates that 3-D optical surface scans offer more data for analysis compared with lateral cephalograms alone. It also highlights the changes that can be detected with surface shape analysis.

摘要

这项前瞻性研究的目的是比较骨骼I类错颌畸形患者拔牙和不拔牙正畸治疗对面部的三维(3-D)影响。24名患者的样本包括12名接受拔牙治疗的患者和12名未接受拔牙治疗的患者。对治疗前的研究模型进行评估,以评估两组之间的牙齿差异。还比较了治疗前和治疗后的头颅侧位片以及光学表面扫描。在头颅侧位片评估中,治疗前唯一显著(P <.05)的差异是下唇长度。治疗后,鼻唇角和下唇厚度有显著差异(P <.05)。平均三维光学表面扫描的配准显示,治疗前,不拔牙组的面部更长更宽5至7毫米,上唇和唇颏沟比拔牙组向前3至5毫米。治疗后,不拔牙组的面部仍然较大,但差异较小。拔牙组的面部随着治疗变得相对更突出。表面形状分析技术显示,治疗开始时不拔牙组的脸颊更扁平,但随着时间推移这种情况发生了逆转。在拔牙组中,唇颏沟的凹陷增加,而不拔牙组在该区域没有变化。该研究表明,与单独的头颅侧位片相比,三维光学表面扫描提供了更多用于分析的数据。它还突出了通过表面形状分析可以检测到的变化。

相似文献

1
Three-dimensional assessment of the effects of extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatment on the face.拔牙与不拔牙正畸治疗对面部影响的三维评估
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002 Mar;121(3):244-56. doi: 10.1067/mod.2002.121010.
2
Treatment and posttreatment changes in patients with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion after extraction and nonextraction treatment.安氏II类1分类错牙合患者拔牙与非拔牙治疗后的治疗及治疗后变化
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997 Jan;111(1):18-27. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70297-x.
3
Effects of extraction and nonextraction therapy with air-rotor stripping on facial esthetics in postadolescent borderline patients.空气涡轮刮治术的拔牙与不拔牙治疗对青少年晚期临界病例面部美学的影响
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Apr;133(4):539-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.052.
4
Dentofacial and soft tissue changes in Class II, division 1 cases treated with and without extractions.拔牙与不拔牙治疗的安氏II类1分类病例的牙颌面及软组织变化
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Jan;107(1):28-37. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70154-0.
5
Comparative evaluation of soft tissue changes in Class I borderline patients treated with extraction and nonextraction modalities.对采用拔牙和不拔牙矫治方式治疗的Ⅰ类临界病例软组织变化的比较评估。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2016 Jul-Aug;21(4):50-9. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.21.4.050-059.oar.
6
The three-dimensional effects of orthodontic treatment on the facial soft tissues--a preliminary study.
Br Dent J. 2002 Jan 26;192(2):104-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4801305.
7
A computer assisted photogrammetric analysis of soft tissue changes after orthodontic treatment. Part II: Results.正畸治疗后软组织变化的计算机辅助摄影测量分析。第二部分:结果。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995 Jul;108(1):38-47. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70064-1.
8
Arch-width and perimeter changes in patients with borderline Class I malocclusion treated with extractions or without extractions with air-rotor stripping.采用拔牙或不拔牙配合气动去釉技术治疗安氏Ⅰ类边缘性错[牙合]患者的牙弓宽度和周长变化。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Jun;137(6):734.e1-7; discussion 734-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.12.023.
9
Therapeutic changes in extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatment.拔牙与不拔牙正畸治疗中的治疗变化。
Eur J Orthod. 1998 Jun;20(3):225-36. doi: 10.1093/ejo/20.3.225.
10
Long-term profile changes in extraction and nonextraction patients.拔牙与非拔牙患者的长期轮廓变化。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Oct;128(4):450-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.04.034.

引用本文的文献

1
Cephalometric and Photographic Evaluation of the Nasolabial Angle in Orthodontically Treated Patients: An Observational Cohort Study.正畸治疗患者鼻唇角的头影测量和摄影评估:一项观察性队列研究
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jan 8;15(2):132. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15020132.
2
Orthodontic program design based on aesthetic.基于美学的正畸方案设计。
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2023 Dec 1;41(6):628-634. doi: 10.7518/hxkq.2023.2023231.
3
Development of novel artificial intelligence systems to predict facial morphology after orthognathic surgery and orthodontic treatment in Japanese patients.
开发新型人工智能系统,以预测日本患者接受正颌手术和正畸治疗后面部形态。
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 4;11(1):15853. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95002-w.
4
The Relationship between Posttreatment Smile Esthetics and the ABO Objective Grading System: Class I Extraction versus Non-Extraction Cases.治疗后微笑美学与ABO客观分级系统的关系:I类拔牙病例与非拔牙病例对比
Turk J Orthod. 2020 Dec 2;34(1):39-45. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.20030. eCollection 2021.
5
Soft tissue facial changes among adult females during alignment stage of orthodontic treatment: a 3D geometric morphometric study.正畸治疗排齐阶段成年女性软组织面型变化的三维几何形态测量研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Feb 9;21(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01425-2.
6
Thickness change of masseter muscles and the surrounding soft tissues in female patients during orthodontic treatment: a retrospective study.女性患者正畸治疗中咀嚼肌及周围软组织厚度变化的回顾性研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2020 Jun 29;20(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01168-6.
7
Evaluation of the relationship between malar projection and lower facial convexity in terms of perceived attractiveness in 3-dimensional reconstructed images.评价三维重建图像中颊部突出度与下面部凸度之间的关系及其对面部吸引力的影响。
Head Face Med. 2020 Apr 28;16(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13005-020-00223-5.
8
Changes in buccal facial depth of female patients after extraction and nonextraction orthodontic treatments: A preliminary study.拔牙与非拔牙正畸治疗后女性患者颊面部深度的变化:一项初步研究。
Korean J Orthod. 2018 May;48(3):172-181. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2018.48.3.172. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
9
Interproximal wear versus incisors extraction to solve anterior lower crowding: a systematic review.邻面磨损与拔除切牙治疗下前牙拥挤的系统评价
Dental Press J Orthod. 2015 Jan-Feb;20(1):66-73. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.20.1.066-073.oar.
10
Facial landmark localization by curvature maps and profile analysis.基于曲率图和轮廓分析的面部地标定位
Head Face Med. 2014 Dec 8;10:54. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-10-54.