Lauretti Gabriela R, Perez Marcelo V, Reis Marlene P, Pereira Newton L
Hospital das Clínicas, Department of Biomechanical and Medical Rehabilitation of the Locomotor Members, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
J Clin Anesth. 2002 Mar;14(2):83-6. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(01)00360-9.
To examine analgesia and adverse effects following transdermal application of nitroglycerine (a nitric oxide generator) combined with oral morphine, in cancer pain patients.
Randomized, double-blind study.
Teaching hospital.
36 patients suffering from cancer pain.
Patients were divided into two groups (n = 18). All patients were regularly taking oral amitriptyline 50 mg at bedtime. Pain was evaluated using a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS). The morphine regimen was individually adjusted to a maximal oral dose of 80 to 90 mg/day, to maintain the VAS score less than 4/10 cm. When patients complained of pain (VAS equal or greater than 4/10), despite taking 80 to 90 mg of oral morphine daily, the transdermal test drug was supplemented as follows: the control group received a placebo patch daily, and the nitroglycerine group received a 5-mg/24-hour nitroglycerine patch daily. Patients were free to manipulate their daily morphine consumption at the time the test drug was administered, to keep VAS less than 4/10 cm. After the introduction of the transdermal test drug, patients were evaluated by the staff on a weekly basis as outpatients, over four consecutive weeks.
The groups were similar in respect to demographic data and VAS pain scores before the treatment. The daily consumption of oral morphine was smaller in the nitroglycerine group compared with the control group after the 14th day of evaluation (p < 0.002). Patients from the control group in general complained of somnolence, compared with the nitroglycerine group.
Transdermal nitroglycerine was an effective coadjuvant analgesic. In conjunction with its opioid tolerance sparing function, delivery of nitric oxide donors together with opioids may be of significant benefit in cancer pain management in delaying morphine tolerance and decreasing the incidence of adverse effects related to high doses of opioids.
在癌症疼痛患者中,研究经皮应用硝酸甘油(一种一氧化氮生成剂)联合口服吗啡后的镇痛效果及不良反应。
随机、双盲研究。
教学医院。
36例癌症疼痛患者。
患者分为两组(每组n = 18)。所有患者均在睡前规律服用口服阿米替林50mg。使用10厘米视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛。吗啡治疗方案根据个体情况调整至最大口服剂量80至90mg/天,以维持VAS评分低于4/10厘米。当患者尽管每天服用80至90mg口服吗啡仍主诉疼痛(VAS等于或大于4/10)时,经皮试验药物补充如下:对照组每日接受安慰剂贴片,硝酸甘油组每日接受5mg/24小时硝酸甘油贴片。在给予试验药物时,患者可自由调整每日吗啡用量,以保持VAS低于4/10厘米。引入经皮试验药物后,工作人员作为门诊患者对患者进行连续四周的每周评估。
两组在治疗前的人口统计学数据和VAS疼痛评分方面相似。评估第14天后,硝酸甘油组口服吗啡的每日用量低于对照组(p < 0.002)。与硝酸甘油组相比,对照组患者普遍主诉嗜睡。
经皮硝酸甘油是一种有效的辅助镇痛药。与其节省阿片类药物耐受性的功能相结合,一氧化氮供体与阿片类药物联合给药可能对癌症疼痛管理有显著益处,可延缓吗啡耐受性并降低与高剂量阿片类药物相关的不良反应发生率。