Sevarino F B, Paige D, Sinatra R S, Silverman D G
Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520-8051, USA.
J Clin Anesth. 1997 May;9(3):173-8. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(97)00043-3.
To compare, in patients who underwent major orthopedic surgical procedures, the efficacy of intravenous (IV) patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine combined with continuous administration of two doses of fentanyl or placebo via transdermal therapeutic system with fentanyl (TTSF) patches.
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
University teaching hospital.
62 patients aged 18 to 65 years, presenting for elective orthopedic surgery and general anesthesia.
Patients were randomized to one of three groups: group 1 received two placebo patches; group 2 received a 20 cm2 active patch delivering 50 micrograms/hr of fentanyl and a 30 cm2 placebo patch; group 3 received a 30 cm2 active patch delivering 75 micrograms/hr of fentanyl and a 20 cm2 placebo patch. All patches were placed approximately two hours prior to induction of general anesthesia. General anesthesia was induced with thiopental, intubation facilitated by the use of vecuronium or pancuronium, and anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane in an oxygen/nitrous oxide mixture (O2/N2O). Following surgery, IV morphine was provided using IV PCA with 1.5 mg of morphine with a 6-minute lockout and a 4-hour maximum dosage of 30 mg.
The time and dosage of morphine administered was recorded. Vital signs, pain intensity at rest, level of sedation, and arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2) were measured at intervals throughout the 72-hour study period and at 6 and 12 hours following patch removal. The presence of side effects was noted. Visual analog pain scores throughout the 72 hours of the study were not significantly different among groups. Patients receiving active TTSF required less IV PCA morphine at all time intervals. However, total opioid consumption was comparable among groups. The incidence of side effects was similar in all groups.
There is no significant advantage to the routine use of continuous transdermal opioid delivery in patients receiving IV PCA after major orthopedic surgery.
在接受大型骨科手术的患者中,比较静脉注射(IV)吗啡自控镇痛(PCA)联合经皮芬太尼治疗系统(TTSF)贴片持续给予两剂芬太尼或安慰剂的疗效。
随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
大学教学医院。
62例年龄在18至65岁之间、拟行择期骨科手术并接受全身麻醉的患者。
患者被随机分为三组之一:第1组接受两片安慰剂贴片;第2组接受一片20平方厘米、释放速率为50微克/小时的芬太尼活性贴片和一片30平方厘米的安慰剂贴片;第3组接受一片30平方厘米、释放速率为75微克/小时的芬太尼活性贴片和一片20平方厘米的安慰剂贴片。所有贴片均在全身麻醉诱导前约两小时贴敷。采用硫喷妥钠诱导全身麻醉,使用维库溴铵或泮库溴铵辅助插管,并用异氟醚在氧气/氧化亚氮混合气体(O2/N2O)中维持麻醉。术后,通过IV PCA给予静脉注射吗啡,吗啡剂量为1.5毫克,锁定时间为6分钟,最大剂量为4小时内30毫克。
记录吗啡给药时间和剂量。在整个72小时的研究期间以及贴片移除后6小时和至12小时,定期测量生命体征、静息时的疼痛强度、镇静水平和动脉血氧饱和度(SpO2)。记录副作用的发生情况。在研究的72小时内,各组间视觉模拟疼痛评分无显著差异。接受活性TTSF的患者在所有时间间隔内所需的静脉注射PCA吗啡较少。然而,各组间总阿片类药物消耗量相当。各组副作用发生率相似。
在大型骨科手术后接受IV PCA的患者中,常规使用持续经皮阿片类药物给药并无显著优势。