Borghi Battista, Casati Andrea, Iuorio Sergio, Celleno Danilo, Michael Michele, Serafini Pierluigi, Pusceddu Antonio, Fanelli Guido
IRCSS Istituti Ortopedici, Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.
J Clin Anesth. 2002 Mar;14(2):102-6. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(01)00362-2.
To evaluate the frequency of hypotension and bradycardia during integrated epidural-general anesthesia as compared with general anesthesia or epidural anesthesia alone.
Prospective, randomized, open, multicenter study.
Inpatient anesthesia at 7 University or Hospital Departments of anesthesia.
210 ASA physical status I, II, and III patients undergoing elective total hip replacement.
Using a balanced randomization method, each hospital enrolled 30 consecutive patients who received integrated epidural-general anesthesia, epidural anesthesia, or general anesthesia.
Occurrence of clinically relevant hypotension (systolic arterial blood pressure (BP) decrease >30% from baseline), or bradycardia (heart rate (HR) <45 bpm) requiring pharmacologic treatment were recorded, as well as routine cardiovascular parameters. Clinically relevant hypotension during induction of nerve block was reported in 13 patients receiving epidural block (18%) and 16 patients receiving epidural-general anesthesia (22%) (p = 0.67). Subsequently, 22 of the remaining 54 patients in the epidural-general anesthesia group (41%) developed hypotension after the induction of general anesthesia, as compared with 16 patients of the general anesthesia group (23%) (p = 0.049). No differences in HR or in frequency of bradycardia were observed in the three groups.
The induction of general anesthesia in patients with an epidural block up to T10 increased the odds of developing clinically relevant hypotension as compared with those patients who received no epidural block, and was associated with a twofold increase of the odds of hypotension as compared with the use of epidural anesthesia alone.
评估与单纯全身麻醉或硬膜外麻醉相比,联合硬膜外-全身麻醉期间低血压和心动过缓的发生率。
前瞻性、随机、开放、多中心研究。
7所大学或医院麻醉科的住院麻醉。
210例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况为I、II和III级的择期全髋关节置换患者。
采用均衡随机方法,每家医院纳入30例连续接受联合硬膜外-全身麻醉、硬膜外麻醉或全身麻醉的患者。
记录临床相关低血压(收缩压(BP)较基线下降>30%)或需要药物治疗的心动过缓(心率(HR)<45次/分钟)的发生情况以及常规心血管参数。接受硬膜外阻滞的13例患者(18%)和接受联合硬膜外-全身麻醉的16例患者(22%)在神经阻滞诱导期间报告有临床相关低血压(p = 0.67)。随后,联合硬膜外-全身麻醉组其余54例患者中有22例(41%)在全身麻醉诱导后出现低血压,而全身麻醉组为16例(23%)(p = 0.049)。三组在心率或心动过缓发生率方面未观察到差异。
与未接受硬膜外阻滞的患者相比,硬膜外阻滞达T10水平的患者进行全身麻醉诱导时发生临床相关低血压的几率增加,且与单独使用硬膜外麻醉相比,低血压几率增加了两倍。