Fanelli G, Casati A, Berti M, Rossignoli L
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, IRCCS H San Raffaele, University of Milan.
Minerva Anestesiol. 1998 Jul-Aug;64(7-8):313-9.
Combined epidural/general anaesthesia might theoretically emphasise the cardiovascular effects of epidural block alone. The goal of the present investigation was to evaluate the incidence of both hypotension and bradycardia during integrated epidural/general anaesthesia in a multicentric, observational study.
The incidence of clinical hypotension (systolic arterial blood pressure decrease by 30% or more from baseline), and bradycardia (heart rate < 50 beats/min) and other side effects have been evaluated in 1200 consecutive patients receiving integrated epidural/general anaesthesia. The time from induction of epidural anaesthesia to induction of general anaesthesia was considered as preoperative; while the time after general anaesthesia induction was considered as intraoperative.
Preoperatively hypotension developed in 85 patients (2.8%), and bradycardia in 54 patients (4.5%). Intraoperatively, hypotension was observed in 380 patients (31.6%), and bradycardia in 153 patients (12.7%). Hypotension and bradycardia were not influenced by the type of surgical procedure, the type of maintenance of general anaesthesia (inhalational versus total intravenous general anaesthesia) and the level of epidural block (lumbar versus thoracic); but they were more frequent in patients with ASA physical status II and III-IV compared to patients with ASA physical status I (p < 0.05). Prophylactic volume preload decreased the incidence of hypotension from 41.5% to 22.4% (p < 0.0001), while prophylactic atropine before epidural block did not affect the incidence of bradycardia. Patients receiving epidural clonidine showed an increased incidence of intraoperative bradycardia compared to those who did not receive it (p < 0.0001).
Randomized, controlled studies should be advocated in order to compare the incidence of hypotension and bradycardia during integrated anaesthesia and during epidural block alone. Our results demonstrated that the use of integrated epidural/general anaesthesia produces an incidence of perioperative hypotension and bradycardia similar to that reported when central blocks are used alone.
理论上,硬膜外联合全身麻醉可能会强化单纯硬膜外阻滞对心血管系统的影响。本研究的目的是在一项多中心观察性研究中,评估硬膜外联合全身麻醉期间低血压和心动过缓的发生率。
对1200例连续接受硬膜外联合全身麻醉的患者,评估临床低血压(收缩压较基线下降30%或更多)、心动过缓(心率<50次/分钟)及其他副作用的发生率。从硬膜外麻醉诱导至全身麻醉诱导的时间视为术前;全身麻醉诱导后的时间视为术中。
术前,85例患者(2.8%)发生低血压,54例患者(4.5%)发生心动过缓。术中,380例患者(31.6%)出现低血压,153例患者(12.7%)出现心动过缓。低血压和心动过缓不受手术类型、全身麻醉维持方式(吸入麻醉与全静脉麻醉)及硬膜外阻滞平面(腰段与胸段)的影响;但与ASA身体状况I级的患者相比,ASA身体状况II级和III-IV级的患者发生率更高(p<0.05)。预防性容量预负荷使低血压发生率从41.5%降至22.4%(p<0.0001),而硬膜外阻滞前预防性使用阿托品未影响心动过缓的发生率。与未接受硬膜外可乐定的患者相比,接受硬膜外可乐定的患者术中心动过缓发生率增加(p<0.0001)。
应提倡进行随机对照研究,以比较联合麻醉期间和单纯硬膜外阻滞期间低血压和心动过缓的发生率。我们的结果表明,硬膜外联合全身麻醉的围手术期低血压和心动过缓发生率与单独使用中枢神经阻滞时报道的发生率相似。