Suppr超能文献

接受诊断性支气管镜检查的低氧血症患者中无创正压通气与传统氧疗的比较

Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation vs. conventional oxygen supplementation in hypoxemic patients undergoing diagnostic bronchoscopy.

作者信息

Antonelli Massimo, Conti Giorgio, Rocco Monica, Arcangeli Andrea, Cavaliere Franco, Proietti Rodolfo, Meduri Gianfranco Umberto

机构信息

Istituto di Anestesiologia e Rianimazione, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Chest. 2002 Apr;121(4):1149-54. doi: 10.1378/chest.121.4.1149.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We have reported previously on the use of noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV) to assist spontaneous breathing in high-risk hypoxemic patients (i.e., PaO(2)/fraction of inspired oxygen [FIO(2)] ratio, < or = 100) who are undergoing diagnostic fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FOB). The efficacy of this intervention in patients with less severe forms of hypoxemia (i.e., PaO(2)/FIO(2) ratio, < 200) is unknown.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-six patients with PaO(2)/FIO(2) ratios < or = 200 who required bronchoscopic BAL for suspected nosocomial pneumonia were entered into the study. Thirteen patients were randomized during FOB to receive NPPV, and 13 patients were randomized to receive conventional oxygen supplementation by Venturi mask. The primary end points were changes in the PaO(2)/FIO(2) ratio during FOB and within 60 min of terminating the procedure. RESULTS AND OUTCOME: At study entry, the two groups were similar in terms of age, simplified acute physiologic score II values, and cardiorespiratory parameters. During FOB, the mean (+/- SD) PaO(2)/FIO(2) ratio increased by 82% in the NPPV group (261 +/- 100 vs 139 +/- 38; p < 0.001) and decreased by 10% in the conventional oxygen supplementation group (155 +/- 24 to 139 +/- 38; p = 0.23). Sixty minutes after undergoing FOB, the NPPV group had a higher mean PaO(2)/FIO(2) ratio (176 +/- 62 vs 140 +/- 38; p = 0.09), a lower mean heart rate (91 +/- 18 vs. 108 +/- 15 beats/min; p = 0.02), and no reduction in mean arterial pressure in comparison to a 15% decrease from the baseline in the control group. One patient in the NPPV group and two patients in the control group required nonemergent intubation. Major bacterial isolates included Staphylococcus aureus (7 of 30 isolates; 23%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (12 of 30 isolates; 40%).

CONCLUSION

In patients with severe hypoxemia, NPPV is superior to conventional oxygen supplementation in preventing gas-exchange deterioration during FOB with better hemodynamic tolerance.

摘要

目的

我们之前报道过在接受诊断性纤维支气管镜检查(FOB)的高危低氧血症患者(即动脉血氧分压[PaO₂]/吸入氧分数[FIO₂]比值≤100)中使用无创正压通气(NPPV)辅助自主呼吸的情况。这种干预措施在低氧血症程度较轻(即PaO₂/FIO₂比值<200)的患者中的疗效尚不清楚。

患者与方法

26例PaO₂/FIO₂比值≤200且因疑似医院获得性肺炎需要进行支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)的患者纳入本研究。13例患者在FOB期间随机接受NPPV,13例患者随机接受文丘里面罩常规氧疗。主要终点是FOB期间及操作结束后60分钟内PaO₂/FIO₂比值的变化。结果与转归:研究入组时,两组在年龄、简化急性生理学评分II值和心肺参数方面相似。在FOB期间,NPPV组的平均(±标准差)PaO₂/FIO₂比值升高了82%(从261±100升至139±38;p<0.001),而常规氧疗组降低了10%(从155±24降至139±38;p = 0.2)。接受FOB后60分钟,NPPV组的平均PaO₂/FIO₂比值更高(176±62 vs 140±38;p = 0.09),平均心率更低(91±18 vs 108±15次/分钟;p = 0.02),与对照组平均动脉压从基线下降15%相比,NPPV组平均动脉压无下降。NPPV组有1例患者和对照组有2例患者需要非紧急插管。主要细菌分离株包括金黄色葡萄球菌(30株分离株中的7株;23%)和铜绿假单胞菌(30株分离株中的12株;40%)。

结论

在严重低氧血症患者中,NPPV在预防FOB期间气体交换恶化方面优于常规氧疗,且血流动力学耐受性更好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验