• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在接受不同控制性卵巢刺激方案治疗的未选择的体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射患者中比较促性腺激素释放激素激动剂和拮抗剂:一项匹配研究。

Comparison of GnRH agonists and antagonists in unselected IVF/ICSI patients treated with different controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols: a matched study.

作者信息

Del Gadillo Juan C Barros, Siebzehnrübl Ernst, Dittrich Ralf, Wildt Ludwig, Lang Norbert

机构信息

Universitäts Frauenklinik Erlangen, Universitäts str. 21-23, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002 May 10;102(2):179-83. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(01)00580-2.

DOI:10.1016/s0301-2115(01)00580-2
PMID:11950487
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the results of the use of GnRH antagonist (GnRHant) and GnRH analog (GnRHa) in two matched groups of unselected IVF/ICSI patients in a retrospective matched pair analysis.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients (n=52) were stimulated with human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) and/or recombinant FSH (rFSH). In Group I (n=26) a daily dose of 0.25mg of Cetrorelix (GnRHant) was administered when follicles reached a diameter of > or = 14 mm. Patients in Group II (n=26) were first desensitized with GnRHa triptorelin long protocol, which was continued during the gonadotropins treatment until the induction of ovulation.

RESULTS

In both groups, serum LH levels remained low during the stimulation. The mean length of stimulation, and the dose of FSH required per patient were similar in both groups. The mean E2 level on day of hCG administration was significantly higher in the patients of Group II (2076+/-1430 versus 1145+/-605 pg/ml), however, a progressive increase in serum E2 concentration during the cycle was noted in both groups. A median of 5.38 and 6.34 mature oocytes per patient was obtained, and the fertilization rate was 59.3% in Group I and 63.6% in Group II. Pregnancy rate (PR) were better in Group II (15 versus 5%), and no severe or moderate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

GnRHant and GnRHa provide comparable results in unselected patients, while GnRHant allows a higher flexibility in the treatment.

摘要

目的

通过回顾性配对分析,评估在两组未经选择的体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射(IVF/ICSI)患者中使用促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂(GnRHant)和促性腺激素释放激素类似物(GnRHa)的结果。

研究设计

患者(n = 52)接受人绝经期促性腺激素(hMG)和/或重组促卵泡激素(rFSH)刺激。在第一组(n = 26)中,当卵泡直径≥14 mm时,每日给予0.25 mg西曲瑞克(GnRHant)。第二组(n = 26)的患者首先采用GnRHa曲普瑞林长方案进行降调节,在促性腺激素治疗期间持续使用直至诱导排卵。

结果

两组在刺激过程中血清促黄体生成素(LH)水平均保持较低。两组的平均刺激时间和每位患者所需的FSH剂量相似。在注射人绒毛膜促性腺激素(hCG)当天,第二组患者的平均雌二醇(E2)水平显著更高(2076±1430 vs 1145±605 pg/ml),然而,两组在周期中血清E2浓度均呈现逐渐升高。每位患者分别获得中位数为5.38和6.34个成熟卵母细胞,第一组的受精率为59.3%,第二组为63.6%。第二组的妊娠率(PR)更高(15% vs 5%),且未发生严重或中度卵巢过度刺激综合征(OHSS)。

结论

在未经选择的患者中,GnRHant和GnRHa的效果相当,而GnRHant在治疗中具有更高的灵活性。

相似文献

1
Comparison of GnRH agonists and antagonists in unselected IVF/ICSI patients treated with different controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols: a matched study.在接受不同控制性卵巢刺激方案治疗的未选择的体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射患者中比较促性腺激素释放激素激动剂和拮抗剂:一项匹配研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002 May 10;102(2):179-83. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(01)00580-2.
2
[Effect of domestic highly purified urinary follicle stimulating hormone on outcomes of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer in controlled ovarian stimulation].国产高纯度尿促卵泡素对控制性卵巢刺激中体外受精-胚胎移植结局的影响
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Nov;48(11):838-42.
3
Use of a single bolus of GnRH agonist triptorelin to trigger ovulation after GnRH antagonist ganirelix treatment in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction, with special reference to the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: preliminary report: short communication.在接受辅助生殖卵巢刺激的女性中,使用单剂量促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)激动剂曲普瑞林在GnRH拮抗剂加尼瑞克治疗后触发排卵,特别提及预防卵巢过度刺激综合征:初步报告:简短通讯
Hum Reprod. 2000 Sep;15(9):1965-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.9.1965.
4
Comparison of GnRH agonists and antagonists in normoresponder IVF/ICSI in Turkish female patients.土耳其女性患者中正常反应者体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射时促性腺激素释放激素激动剂与拮抗剂的比较
Adv Ther. 2008 Mar;25(3):266-73. doi: 10.1007/s12325-008-0028-8.
5
[Use of GnRh antagonist (Cetrorelix) in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in women with polycystic ovary disease].
Tunis Med. 2008 Dec;86(12):1060-5.
6
Supplementation with human menopausal gonadotropin in the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles of women with high AMH: Pregnancy outcomes and serial hormone levels.在高 AMH 女性的 GnRH 拮抗剂周期中补充人绝经促性腺激素:妊娠结局和连续激素水平。
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jul;60(4):739-744. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2021.05.027.
7
Comparison of GnRH agonists and antagonists in assisted reproduction cycles of patients at high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.卵巢过度刺激综合征高危患者辅助生殖周期中促性腺激素释放激素激动剂与拮抗剂的比较。
Hum Reprod. 2005 Sep;20(9):2421-5. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei074. Epub 2005 May 12.
8
[Comparison of GnRH antagonist fixed protocol and GnRH agonists long protocol in infertile patients with normal ovarian reserve function in their first in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycle].[GnRH拮抗剂固定方案与GnRH激动剂长方案在首次体外受精-胚胎移植周期中卵巢储备功能正常的不孕患者中的比较]
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Apr;47(4):245-9.
9
Recombinant gonadotrophins associated with GnRH antagonist (cetrorelix) in ovarian stimulation for ICSI: comparison of r-FSH alone and in combination with r-LH.重组促性腺激素与GnRH拮抗剂(西曲瑞克)联合用于ICSI的卵巢刺激:单独使用重组FSH及与重组LH联合使用的比较
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006 Jun 1;126(2):212-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.11.023. Epub 2005 Dec 27.
10
Is the GnRH Antagonist Protocol Effective at Preventing OHSS for Potentially High Responders Undergoing IVF/ICSI?促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂方案对接受体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射的潜在高反应者预防卵巢过度刺激综合征有效吗?
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 15;10(10):e0140286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140286. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of pregnancy outcomes and safety between cetrorelix and ganirelix in IVF/ICSI antagonist protocols: a retrospective cohort study.在体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射拮抗剂方案中,西曲瑞克和加尼瑞克对妊娠结局及安全性的比较:一项回顾性队列研究
Front Reprod Health. 2025 Apr 14;7:1492441. doi: 10.3389/frph.2025.1492441. eCollection 2025.
2
Ovarian stimulation with GnRH analogues.使用促性腺激素释放激素类似物进行卵巢刺激。
JBRA Assist Reprod. 2014 Jun 27;18(2):42-46. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20140003.
3
A Patient Friendly Corifollitropin Alfa Protocol without Routine Pituitary Suppression in Normal Responders.
正常反应者中无需常规垂体抑制的患者友好型 Corifollitropin Alfa 方案。
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 21;11(4):e0154123. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154123. eCollection 2016.
4
Predictive factors for oocyte retrieval failure in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols: a retrospective observational cohort study.控制性卵巢刺激方案中卵母细胞取卵失败的预测因素:一项回顾性观察队列研究。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2015 Jun 2;13:53. doi: 10.1186/s12958-015-0052-x.
5
Comparison of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist with GnRH antagonist in polycystic ovary syndrome patients undergoing in vitro fertilization cycle: Retrospective analysis from a tertiary center and review of literature.多囊卵巢综合征患者体外受精周期中促性腺激素释放激素激动剂与GnRH拮抗剂的比较:来自三级中心的回顾性分析及文献综述
J Hum Reprod Sci. 2014 Jan;7(1):52-7. doi: 10.4103/0974-1208.130852.
6
Oncofertility: combination of ovarian stimulation with subsequent ovarian tissue extraction on the day of oocyte retrieval.肿瘤生育力保护:在取卵日进行卵巢刺激和随后的卵巢组织采集相结合。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2013 Mar 5;11:19. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-11-19.
7
Comparison between a GnRH agonist and a GnRH antagonist protocol for the same patient undergoing IVF.同一患者接受体外受精时促性腺激素释放激素激动剂方案与促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂方案的比较。
J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2008 Oct;28(5):618-20. doi: 10.1007/s11596-008-0529-3. Epub 2008 Oct 10.