Singh Neeta, Naha Moumita, Malhotra Neena, Lata Kusum, Vanamail P, Tiwari Abnish
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
J Hum Reprod Sci. 2014 Jan;7(1):52-7. doi: 10.4103/0974-1208.130852.
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is one of the most common infertility factor for which women are enrolled in in vitro fertilization (IVF) technique. In the recent years, gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist protocol has emerged as the protocol of choice for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in these patients.
The objective of the present study is to compare conventional long agonist protocol with fixed antagonist protocol in PCOS patients undergoing IVF cycle.
Retrospective analysis of 4 years data of a single center from northern India. Totally 81 patients who had long agonist protocol were compared with 36 patients with similar baseline characteristics who had antagonist protocol.
Total dose of gonadotropin required was significantly lower (P - 0.004) in the antagonist group. There was no significant difference in pregnancy rate or incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome between two groups. Cycle cancellation due to arrest of follicular growth was significantly higher in the antagonist group (P - 0.027).
More randomized control trials and meta-analysis are required before replacing conventional long agonist protocol with antagonist protocol in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome.
多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)是女性接受体外受精(IVF)技术的最常见不孕因素之一。近年来,促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂方案已成为这些患者控制性卵巢过度刺激的首选方案。
本研究的目的是比较接受IVF周期的PCOS患者中传统长效激动剂方案与固定拮抗剂方案。
对印度北部一个单一中心4年的数据进行回顾性分析。将81例采用长效激动剂方案的患者与36例具有相似基线特征且采用拮抗剂方案的患者进行比较。
拮抗剂组所需促性腺激素的总剂量显著更低(P = 0.004)。两组之间的妊娠率或卵巢过度刺激综合征的发生率无显著差异。拮抗剂组因卵泡生长停滞导致的周期取消率显著更高(P = 0.027)。
在多囊卵巢综合征患者中用拮抗剂方案替代传统长效激动剂方案之前,需要更多的随机对照试验和荟萃分析。