Suppr超能文献

多囊卵巢综合征患者体外受精周期中促性腺激素释放激素激动剂与GnRH拮抗剂的比较:来自三级中心的回顾性分析及文献综述

Comparison of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist with GnRH antagonist in polycystic ovary syndrome patients undergoing in vitro fertilization cycle: Retrospective analysis from a tertiary center and review of literature.

作者信息

Singh Neeta, Naha Moumita, Malhotra Neena, Lata Kusum, Vanamail P, Tiwari Abnish

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

J Hum Reprod Sci. 2014 Jan;7(1):52-7. doi: 10.4103/0974-1208.130852.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is one of the most common infertility factor for which women are enrolled in in vitro fertilization (IVF) technique. In the recent years, gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist protocol has emerged as the protocol of choice for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in these patients.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of the present study is to compare conventional long agonist protocol with fixed antagonist protocol in PCOS patients undergoing IVF cycle.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 4 years data of a single center from northern India. Totally 81 patients who had long agonist protocol were compared with 36 patients with similar baseline characteristics who had antagonist protocol.

RESULT

Total dose of gonadotropin required was significantly lower (P - 0.004) in the antagonist group. There was no significant difference in pregnancy rate or incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome between two groups. Cycle cancellation due to arrest of follicular growth was significantly higher in the antagonist group (P - 0.027).

CONCLUSION

More randomized control trials and meta-analysis are required before replacing conventional long agonist protocol with antagonist protocol in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome.

摘要

引言

多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)是女性接受体外受精(IVF)技术的最常见不孕因素之一。近年来,促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂方案已成为这些患者控制性卵巢过度刺激的首选方案。

目的

本研究的目的是比较接受IVF周期的PCOS患者中传统长效激动剂方案与固定拮抗剂方案。

材料与方法

对印度北部一个单一中心4年的数据进行回顾性分析。将81例采用长效激动剂方案的患者与36例具有相似基线特征且采用拮抗剂方案的患者进行比较。

结果

拮抗剂组所需促性腺激素的总剂量显著更低(P = 0.004)。两组之间的妊娠率或卵巢过度刺激综合征的发生率无显著差异。拮抗剂组因卵泡生长停滞导致的周期取消率显著更高(P = 0.027)。

结论

在多囊卵巢综合征患者中用拮抗剂方案替代传统长效激动剂方案之前,需要更多的随机对照试验和荟萃分析。

相似文献

5
Early gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A preliminary randomized trial.
Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2018 Sep;45(3):135-142. doi: 10.5653/cerm.2018.45.3.135. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
9
The prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014 Nov;36(11):1024-1033. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30417-5.

本文引用的文献

1
GnRH Antagonist IVF Protocol in PCOS.
Curr Health Sci J. 2013 Jan;39(1):20-5. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
4
Meta-analysis of GnRH antagonist protocols: do they reduce the risk of OHSS in PCOS?
Reprod Biomed Online. 2012 Jan;24(1):6-22. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.09.017. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
5
Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists for assisted reproductive technology.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 May 11(5):CD001750. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001750.pub3.
9
What is the preferred GnRH analogue for polycystic ovary syndrome patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for in vitro fertilization?
Fertil Steril. 2009 Apr;91(4 Suppl):1466-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.07.1711. Epub 2008 Sep 6.
10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验