Waters W H, Udy S C, Lunn J E
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1975 Aug;25(157):576-84.
This paper describes three years' experience of running a domiciliary physiotherapy service based on general practice and financed by limited voluntary funds.The need arose from the remoteness of, and lack of, open access to, hospital physiotherapy. This was particularly so for elderly patients who were often frail and mentally confused. In addition there were obvious advantages in properly instructing relatives in management and treatment, especially since many of the patients and their relatives expressed a desire for home treatment.There was also a desire on the part of the general practitioners, nurses, and ancillary workers to develop further the teamwork in the health services of the four villages involved. Details of the constitution of the voluntary service and its financial arrangements are given.The results of the service and the nature of its work are described. There were no difficulties experienced in selecting the correct patients for treatment and the type of equipment required was almost all normally available through the health authority nursing service. There was no great need for expensive or heavy equipment and no transport problems arose.It was found that one hour of physiotherapist's time per 1,000 patients per week was adequate to cover all patients requiring short-term intensive therapy and to allow a small amount of palliative therapy in addition, although this had not been the original intention of the service.The physiotherapist averaged about 40 hours work per month and under these conditions the travelling and costs averaged 1.54 miles and 83 pence per visit. With self-determined hours of work and flexible timing, these conditions proved ideal for a married physiotherapist with the responsibility of a young family. Expansion of the hours of work in this particular area would have led to wasteful visits devoted to palliative and placebo therapy; and extension of the service beyond the area defined, would have increased travelling time at the expense of working time. Thus there appear to be considerable advantages in keeping general-practice based domiciliary physiotherapy work on a part-time basis and looking for staff living close to the practice.
本文介绍了一项为期三年的居家物理治疗服务经验。该服务以全科医疗为基础,由有限的自愿基金提供资金。开展这项服务的需求源于医院物理治疗服务地点偏远且难以获得。对于那些身体虚弱且精神迷糊的老年患者来说尤其如此。此外,对亲属进行管理和治疗方面的适当指导有明显优势,特别是因为许多患者及其亲属都希望接受居家治疗。全科医生、护士和辅助工作人员也希望进一步发展涉及的四个村庄卫生服务中的团队合作。文中给出了志愿服务的构成及其财务安排的详细信息。描述了该服务的结果及其工作性质。在选择合适的治疗患者方面没有遇到困难,所需的设备类型几乎都可以通过卫生当局的护理服务正常获得。不需要昂贵或重型设备,也没有出现运输问题。结果发现,每周每1000名患者有一小时的物理治疗师时间就足以覆盖所有需要短期强化治疗的患者,此外还能进行少量的姑息治疗,尽管这并非该服务的初衷。物理治疗师平均每月工作约40小时,在这种情况下,每次出诊的行程平均为1.54英里,费用平均为83便士。由于工作时间可自行决定且时间安排灵活,这些条件对于一位有年幼家庭需要照顾的已婚物理治疗师来说堪称理想。在这个特定区域增加工作时间会导致用于姑息治疗和安慰剂治疗的出诊变得浪费;而将服务范围扩大到规定区域之外,则会增加出行时间,减少工作时间。因此,将基于全科医疗的居家物理治疗工作保持在兼职基础上,并寻找居住在诊所附近的工作人员似乎有相当大的优势。