Budowle Bruce, Allard Marc W, Wilson Mark R
Laboratory Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Washington, DC 20535, USA.
Forensic Sci Int. 2002 Mar 28;126(1):30-3. doi: 10.1016/s0379-0738(02)00019-1.
The phenomenon known as heteroplasmy can be operationally observed in some human mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) samples. Typically, heteroplasmy manifests itself in an individual presenting two mtDNA species that differ at a single base. Heteroplasmy at two, and even possibly three sites, also may occur, but at very low rates. A recent report (Grzybowski, 2000, see ref. [13]) suggests that much higher levels of mtDNA (point substitution) heteroplasmy can occur in hair. This observation is contrary to the experience of the forensic mtDNA community. There are several explanations for the unusual findings of high levels of heteroplasmy. First, the template quantities of DNA are approximately three orders of magnitude higher than required for mtDNA sequencing, and an excessive number of amplification cycles were used. Thus, the protocol used did not follow routine practices by the forensic community. Second, there are misidentifications and tabular errors that call into question the reliability of the findings. Third, by comparing the natural human mtDNA variation with a reference sample population with that observed in the heteroplasmy in hair study, the data are inconsistent with population genetic expectations. The observation of high levels of heteroplasmy may be due to contamination of the samples and/or possibly the amplification of nuclear pseudogenes. The results observed in the heteroplasmy in hair study do not apply to other methods of mtDNA analysis and cannot be used to question the reliability of the current forensic mtDNA practices.
在一些人类线粒体DNA(mtDNA)样本中,可以通过操作观察到异质性现象。通常,异质性在个体中表现为存在两种在单个碱基上不同的mtDNA种类。两个甚至可能三个位点的异质性也可能发生,但发生率非常低。最近的一份报告(Grzybowski,2000,见参考文献[13])表明,头发中可能出现更高水平的mtDNA(点替换)异质性。这一观察结果与法医mtDNA领域的经验相悖。对于高水平异质性这一异常发现有几种解释。首先,DNA的模板量比mtDNA测序所需的量大约高三个数量级,并且使用了过多的扩增循环。因此,所采用的方案未遵循法医领域的常规做法。其次,存在错误识别和表格错误,这使得研究结果的可靠性受到质疑。第三,通过将人类自然mtDNA变异与参考样本群体进行比较,并与头发研究中观察到的异质性进行对比,数据与群体遗传学预期不一致。高水平异质性的观察结果可能是由于样本污染和/或可能是核假基因的扩增。在头发研究的异质性中观察到的结果不适用于其他mtDNA分析方法,也不能用于质疑当前法医mtDNA实践的可靠性。