Sonet Bernard, Vanderbist Francis, Streel Bruno, Houin Georges
Laboratories SMB-Galéphar, Brussels, Belgium.
Arzneimittelforschung. 2002;52(3):200-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1299880.
Bioequivalence of a newly developed semi-solid formulation (Lidose) of fenofibrate (CAS 49562-28-9), and a reference, micronized formulation of fenofibrate was investigated in two randomised, open-label clinical studies with a crossover design. Both studies involved two distinct groups of 24 healthy volunteers. Doses of 67 mg and 200 mg, respectively, were used in study 1 and study 2. On day 1, a single oral dose was administered to all subjects, using one of the two formulations to be compared. Single oral dosing with the other formulation occurred after a washout period of at least 8 days. Blood samples were taken after each dosing for measurement of plasma fenofibric acid concentrations by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) combined with fluorescence detection, and plasma pharmacokinetic parameters were determined. No statistically significant differences were noted for Cmax, Tmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-variation of between subjects treated with the new formulation and those receiving the reference formulation. Side effects were mild and not significantly different between the two fenofibrate preparations. These two studies based on validated methods demonstrate that the new and the reference fenofibrate formulations are bioequivalent when administered at the two doses studied.
在两项采用交叉设计的随机、开放标签临床研究中,对新开发的非诺贝特(CAS 49562-28-9)半固体剂型(Lidose)与参比微粉化非诺贝特剂型的生物等效性进行了研究。两项研究均纳入两组各24名健康志愿者。研究1和研究2分别使用67毫克和200毫克的剂量。第1天,给所有受试者单次口服一剂待比较的两种剂型之一。在至少8天的洗脱期后,再给受试者单次口服另一剂型。每次给药后采集血样,采用高效液相色谱(HPLC)结合荧光检测法测定血浆非诺贝特酸浓度,并确定血浆药代动力学参数。新剂型治疗组与参比剂型治疗组受试者之间的Cmax、Tmax、AUC0-t和AUC0-∞无统计学显著差异。两种非诺贝特制剂的副作用均较轻微,且无显著差异。这两项基于经验证方法的研究表明,新非诺贝特剂型与参比剂型在研究的两种剂量下给药时生物等效。