Vlase Laurian, Popa Adina, Muntean Dana, Leucuta Sorin E
Department of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmaceutics, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Iuliu Hatieganu, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Arzneimittelforschung. 2010;60(9):560-3. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1296325.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of fenofibric acid, the main metabolite of fenofibrate (CAS 49562-28-9), and to assess the average bioequivalence of two immediate release formulations of 200 mg fenofibrate capsules in 24 healthy volunteers. The relative bioavailability of the test (generic) product Lipivim with respect to the reference product was determined in a single dose, randomized, crossover study. Only the concentrations of fenofibric acid could be used for bioequivalence determination, because the concentrations of the parent drug were too low to be accurately measured in the biological matrix. The mean values for the Cmax were 3.08 (+/- 1.69) microg/ml for the test and 3.05 (+/- 1.79) microg/ml for the reference product. The mean values for the AUC(0-infinity) were 94.5 (+/- 41.5) microg/ml h for the test and 88.2 (+/- 41.4) microg/ml h for thereference, respectively. The 90% confidence intervals for test/reference mean ratios of the plasma pharmacokinetic variables Cmax, AUC(0-t) and AUC(0-infinity) lie within the conventional bioequivalence range of 80-125% (Schuirman test). The difference between Tmax of the test and reference products was statistically non-significant (Friedman test). The test product is therefore bioequivalent to the reference product with respect to the rate and extent of fenofibric acid pharmacokinetics.
本研究的目的是评估非诺贝特(CAS 49562-28-9)的主要代谢产物非诺贝特酸的药代动力学,并评估200毫克非诺贝特胶囊的两种速释制剂在24名健康志愿者中的平均生物等效性。在一项单剂量、随机、交叉研究中测定了受试(仿制药)产品Lipivim相对于参比产品的相对生物利用度。由于母体药物的浓度在生物基质中过低而无法准确测量,因此仅可使用非诺贝特酸的浓度进行生物等效性测定。受试产品的Cmax平均值为3.08(±1.69)微克/毫升,参比产品为3.05(±1.79)微克/毫升。受试产品的AUC(0-无穷大)平均值为94.5(±41.5)微克/毫升·小时,参比产品为88.2(±41.4)微克/毫升·小时。血浆药代动力学变量Cmax、AUC(0-t)和AUC(0-无穷大)的受试/参比平均比值的90%置信区间落在80-125%的传统生物等效性范围内(Schuirman检验)。受试产品和参比产品的Tmax之间的差异无统计学意义(Friedman检验)。因此,受试产品在非诺贝特酸药代动力学的速率和程度方面与参比产品生物等效。