Holmes Douglas, Teresi Jeanne, Kong Jian
National Alzheimer Center, 5901 Pausade Avenue, Riverdale, NY 10471, USA.
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2000 Sep 1;3(3):121-127. doi: 10.1002/mhp.87.
There are over 17 000 nursing homes in the United States. Within these, special care units (SCUs) provide a separate residential and/or activity locus for residents, and are expected to provide more staff time and more specialized staff assignments. This paper addresses a fundamental issue relating to the nature, quality and quantity of resident care inputs: what impacts of SCUs are associated with added service inputs, and thus with personnel costs, recognizing that personnel account for the majority of costs associated with nursing home care? AIMS OF THE STUDY: The aim of this aspect of the study was to determine the extent to which additions of staff would result in a diminution of deviant behaviors among residents of special care and of traditional care units. METHOD: The data were collected from a random sample of ten downstate nursing homes located in New York State. Using rigorous sampling procedures, random samples of 40 residents were drawn from each of the facilities, equally divided between special care unit and traditional care unit residents. Thus, the sampling design involved two levels of clustering: subjects were clustered within units and units were clustered within facilities. The observational behaviour measure was taken from the INCARE (institutional version of the Comprehensive Assessment and Referral Evaluation). The behavioral observation measure contains 23 items such as "disruptive of others", "picks/pulls clothing", "repetitive movements", "repetitive questioning"and "wandering". Each item is rated as to frequency of occurrence; ratings are collected on three occasions, and averaged. Outcome and covariate data (e.g., behavior and cognition) were collected by trained research staff who visited each site for three to four weeks of intensive data collection, accomplished through direct resident interviews, staff interviews and questionnaires and chart data abstraction. The clinical staff time data were collected using the InfoAide system, whereby each care provider used a portable barcode scanner to record the type of care given, the recipient and the duration of care. A random effects model using the SAS mixed procedure was applied to the data; adhering to this model, some effects were fixed and some random. The random effects were comprised of the subject (intercept or subject starting point at baseline) and the unit; used here was restricted maximum likelihood (REML) with the EM algorithm. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction of behavior disorder associated with more provision of aide time in SCUs as contrasted with non-SCUs. The greater the service provided, the greater the slope, i.e., the greater the reduction. That is, while SCU residents showed improvements in behavior accompanying increases in aide time, no such change was observed among non-SCU residents. IMPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH CARE PROVISION AND USE: The significant effect of SCU + time + aide-minutes indicates that more aide time on SCUs was associated with improvement in behavior. It appears that the important ingredient in relation to the reduction of behavior disorder is not membership in an SCU per se, but the provision of more aide time within SCUs. Those SCUs that provide more aide time have a better behavior outcome. Thus, these findings point to additional paths for exploration, i.e., future research needs to focus on elements of SCUs such as the available amounts of program and staff resources rather than on SCU status alone.
美国有超过17000家疗养院。在这些疗养院中,特殊护理单元(SCU)为居民提供独立的居住和/或活动场所,并且预计会提供更多的员工工作时间以及更专业化的员工任务分配。本文探讨了一个与居民护理投入的性质、质量和数量相关的基本问题:特殊护理单元的哪些影响与额外的服务投入相关,进而与人员成本相关,要认识到人员占疗养院护理相关成本的大部分?
本研究这一方面的目的是确定增加员工会在多大程度上减少特殊护理单元和传统护理单元居民的异常行为。
数据来自纽约州南部十家疗养院的随机样本。采用严格的抽样程序,从每个机构中随机抽取40名居民样本,在特殊护理单元居民和传统护理单元居民之间平均分配。因此,抽样设计涉及两个层次的聚类:个体在单元内聚类,单元在机构内聚类。观察行为测量取自INCARE(综合评估与转诊评价的机构版)。行为观察测量包含23个项目,如“干扰他人”、“拉扯衣服”、“重复动作”、“重复提问”和“徘徊”。每个项目按发生频率进行评分;在三个时间点收集评分并求平均值。结果和协变量数据(如行为和认知)由经过培训的研究人员收集,他们访问每个地点进行三到四周的密集数据收集,通过直接居民访谈、员工访谈、问卷调查和图表数据提取来完成。临床员工时间数据使用InfoAide系统收集,每个护理提供者使用便携式条形码扫描仪记录所提供护理的类型、接受者和护理持续时间。对数据应用使用SAS混合程序的随机效应模型;遵循此模型,一些效应是固定的,一些是随机的。随机效应由个体(截距或基线时的个体起始点)和单元组成;这里使用的是带有期望最大化(EM)算法的限制最大似然法(REML)。
与非特殊护理单元相比,特殊护理单元中随着更多护理时间的提供,行为障碍显著减少。提供的服务越多,斜率越大,即减少幅度越大。也就是说,虽然特殊护理单元居民的行为随着护理时间的增加而改善,但在非特殊护理单元居民中未观察到这种变化。
特殊护理单元+时间+护理分钟数的显著效应表明,特殊护理单元上更多的护理时间与行为改善相关。看来与减少行为障碍相关的重要因素不是特殊护理单元本身的成员身份,而是特殊护理单元内提供更多的护理时间。那些提供更多护理时间的特殊护理单元有更好的行为结果。因此,这些发现指出了其他可供探索的途径,即未来的研究需要关注特殊护理单元的要素,如项目和员工资源的可用数量,而不是仅仅关注特殊护理单元的状态。