Randomised trial of the effects of structuring clinic correspondence.
作者信息
Melville C, Hands S, Jones P
机构信息
Dept of Postgraduate Medicine, Keele University, UK.
出版信息
Arch Dis Child. 2002 May;86(5):374-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.86.5.374.
Abstract
We performed a randomised controlled crossover trial of clinic letters. Structured letters were compared with conventional letters containing problem lists. There were 32 participants; 25 preferred the structured letter. Median rating and items identified were higher for the structured letter. Structured clinical correspondence with paragraph headings is strongly preferred and increases comprehension.
摘要
相似文献
1
Randomised trial of the effects of structuring clinic correspondence.
Arch Dis Child. 2002 May;86(5):374-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.86.5.374.
2
Prospective assessment of patient directed outpatient communication from a patient and general practitioner perspective.
Postgrad Med J. 2009 Aug;85(1006):395-8. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2008.068601.
3
Computer-generated correspondence for patients attending an open-access chest pain clinic.
J R Coll Physicians Lond. 1998 Sep-Oct;32(5):420-1.
4
Letters and notes in orthopaedic surgery.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006 May;88(3):292-6. doi: 10.1308/003588406X98612.
5
Use of structured letters to improve communication between hospital doctors and general practitioners.
BMJ. 1993 Oct 23;307(6911):1044. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6911.1044.
6
Communication across the divide. A trial of structured communication between general practice and emergency departments.
Aust Fam Physician. 2002 Feb;31(2):197-200.
7
Comparison of acceptability by general practitioners of word processor and conventional discharge letters.
Health Bull (Edinb). 1990 Jan;48(1):29-35.
8
Referral letters: are form letters better?
Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Feb;47(415):107-8.
9
Improving the quality of outpatient clinic letters using the Sheffield Assessment Instrument for Letters (SAIL).
Med Educ. 2004 Aug;38(8):852-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01898.x.
10
Communication at the interface: do better referral letters produce better consultant replies?
Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Mar;53(488):217-9.
引用本文的文献
1
Still room for improvement: standardisation of clinical correspondence and experience in a rural crisis and home treatment service.
BJPsych Bull. 2019 Jun;43(3):142. doi: 10.1192/bjb.2019.29.
2
Valued Components of a Consultant Letter from Referring Physicians' Perspective: a Systematic Literature Synthesis.
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Jun;33(6):948-954. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4356-3. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
3
Communication in healthcare: a narrative review of the literature and practical recommendations.
Int J Clin Pract. 2015 Nov;69(11):1257-67. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12686. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
4
Outcome progress letter types: parent and physician preferences for letters from pediatric mental health services.
Can Fam Physician. 2011 Dec;57(12):e473-81.
5
The preference of general practitioners for structured outpatient clinic letters.
Clin Med (Lond). 2011 Apr;11(2):205-6. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.11-2-205.
6
How do general practitioners and specialists value their mutual communication? A survey.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Aug 8;9:143. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-143.
7
Illegible handwriting in medical records.
J R Soc Med. 2003 Jan;96(1):51. doi: 10.1177/014107680309600122.
Zotero 插件