Suppr超能文献

使用可吸收或传统骨水泥进行增强对股骨颈骨折固定装置握持强度的影响。

The effect of augmentation with resorbable or conventional bone cement on the holding strength for femoral neck fracture devices.

作者信息

Eriksson Fredrik, Mattsson Per, Larsson Sune

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, Uppsala University Hospital, SE-751 85 Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

J Orthop Trauma. 2002 May;16(5):302-10. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200205000-00003.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare maximum extraction torque and pull-out load for femoral neck fracture implants inserted with standard technique or after augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) or calcium phosphate cement (Norian SRS).

DESIGN

Biomechanical study using synthetic bone.

INTERVENTION

Implants were inserted in foam blocks with three different densities for simulation of normal bone or slight or severe osteoporosis. Tested implants included three screws (AO, Olmed, Hansson), one screw with both threads and a barb (Hybrid), and one pin with a hook (LIH hook-pin). Implants were inserted by standard technique and after augmentation with PMMA or Norian SRS.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT

The effect of (a) density of the synthetic bone (low, medium, high), (b) augmentation (none, PMMA, SRS), and (c) type of implant (AO, Olmed, Hansson, Hybrid, LIH) on the maximum extraction torque and pull-out load was determined using a material testing machine. Analysis of variance with Fisher's PLSD post hoc test was used to determine statistical differences.

RESULTS

PMMA significantly increased maximum torque and pull-out load for all implants and block densities when compared without cement (p < 0.0001), whereas enhancement with SRS was far less pronounced and most obvious in low density blocks. For screws normally inserted without predrilling (Olmed and Hansson) the use of SRS in high density blocks caused a significant reduction in maximum torque (p < 0.0001) and pull-out load (p < 0.0001). SRS-augmented specimens failed through the cement at the periphery of the threads, whereas PMMA-augmented specimens failed between the cement and the synthetic bone.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that augmentation with PMMA around femoral neck fracture implants will increase the holding power significantly when compared with standard insertion technique as well as augmentation with calcium phosphate cement. Augmentation with calcium phosphate cement like SRS will increase the holding characteristics mainly in low density bone, whereas in high density bone it might even reduce the maximum torque because of the need for predrilling when using the cement for augmentation.

摘要

目的

比较采用标准技术植入或用聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)或磷酸钙骨水泥(Norian SRS)增强后植入的股骨颈骨折内固定物的最大拔出扭矩和拔出负荷。

设计

使用合成骨进行生物力学研究。

干预

将内固定物植入具有三种不同密度的泡沫块中,以模拟正常骨或轻度或重度骨质疏松。测试的内固定物包括三种螺钉(AO、Olmed、Hansson)、一种带螺纹和倒刺的螺钉(Hybrid)以及一种带钩的销钉(LIH钩钉)。内固定物通过标准技术植入,并在用PMMA或Norian SRS增强后植入。

主要观察指标

使用材料试验机确定(a)合成骨密度(低、中、高)、(b)增强方式(无、PMMA、SRS)和(c)内固定物类型(AO、Olmed、Hansson、Hybrid、LIH)对最大拔出扭矩和拔出负荷的影响。采用方差分析和Fisher最小显著差异法(PLSD)进行事后检验以确定统计学差异。

结果

与未使用骨水泥相比,PMMA显著增加了所有内固定物和不同密度骨块的最大扭矩和拔出负荷(p < 0.0001),而SRS增强的效果则远不明显,在低密度骨块中最为明显。对于通常无需预钻孔即可植入的螺钉(Olmed和Hansson),在高密度骨块中使用SRS会导致最大扭矩(p < 0.0001)和拔出负荷(p < 0.0001)显著降低。SRS增强的标本在螺纹周边的骨水泥处断裂,而PMMA增强的标本在骨水泥与合成骨之间断裂。

结论

本研究表明,与标准植入技术以及磷酸钙骨水泥增强相比,股骨颈骨折内固定物周围使用PMMA增强将显著提高固定力。像SRS这样的磷酸钙骨水泥增强主要在低密度骨中会增加固定特性,而在高密度骨中,由于使用骨水泥增强时需要预钻孔,甚至可能会降低最大扭矩。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验