Moore D C, Frankenburg E P, Goulet J A, Goldstein S A
Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-0486, USA.
J Orthop Trauma. 1997 Nov;11(8):577-83. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199711000-00006.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: This study was performed to determine whether a new, in situ-setting calcium phosphate cement would have sufficient mechanical integrity to reinforce compression screw fixation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. We compared the cut-out resistance of screws augmented with calcium phosphate cement to the cut-out resistance of screws augmented with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). We used PMMA as the standard for comparison because it is currently used clinically. Our hypothesis was that initial fixation strength with PMMA and calcium phosphate cement augmentation would not be significantly different from one another.
Cut-out testing of compression hip screws in paired human cadaveric proximal femurs was performed before and after augmentation with PMMA or calcium phosphate cement. Bilateral testing was performed to allow pairwise comparisons of the materials used for augmentation, and repeated testing was done to provide an internal control for the effects of bone quality. The initial fixation of screws augmented with calcium phosphate cement was compared with that of screws augmented with PMMA.
Ten paired human femurs (mean age, 75 +/- 9.2 years) were implanted with Richards AMBI compression hip screws. Basicervical osteotomies were then performed, yielding isolated proximal fragments for mechanical testing. Preaugmentation cut-out tests were performed under displacement control, with cut-out continuing to five millimeters at two millimeters per second. The screws were then removed, and the screw tracks were filled with 2.0 cubic centimeters of PMMA (one side) or calcium phosphate cement (contralateral side). After augmentation, the screws were reinserted and the cements were allowed to harden for twenty-four hours. Postaugmentation testing followed the protocols for preaugmentation testing, and the initial fixation strength of screws augmented with calcium phosphate cement was compared with the initial fixation strength of screws augmented with PMMA using a two-way repeated measures analysis of variance.
The cut-out behavior of screws augmented with calcium phosphate cement was not significantly different from the cut-out behavior of screws augmented with PMMA. With calcium phosphate cement, yield strength increased by 15.8 percent (from 1,354 +/- 632 newtons to 1,568 +/- 320 newtons); with PMMA, the yield strength increased by 26.8 percent (from 1,477 +/- 526 newtons to 1,834 +/- 225 newtons). However, only the increase with PMMA augmentation was significant at p < 0.05). The energy to yield increased significantly (41 percent, p < 0.05) with both types of augmentation (from 2,399 +/- 1,186 newton-millimeters to 3,378 +/- 857 newton-millimeters for calcium phosphate cement, and from 2,635 +/- 1,113 newton-millimeters to 3,741 +/- 426 newton-millimeters for PMMA), whereas the stiffness increased only slightly with PMMA augmentation (6.2 percent, from 481 +/- 180 newtons per millimeter to 511 +/- 92 newtons per millimeter) and fell slightly with calcium phosphate cement augmentation (10 percent, from 457 +/- 201 newtons per millimeter to 411 +/- 663 newtons per millimeter).
The in situ-setting calcium phosphate cement investigated in this study compared favorably with PMMA in a single-cycle cut-out test of augmented compression hip screws in senile trabecular bone. Our results suggest that these materials may have promise as substitutes for PMMA in the salvage of compression hip screw fixation in elderly osteopenic patients with complex intertrochanteric fractures and that further study of their use in this application is warranted.
目的/假设:本研究旨在确定一种新型的原位固化磷酸钙骨水泥是否具有足够的机械完整性,以加强不稳定型股骨转子间骨折的加压螺钉固定。我们比较了用磷酸钙骨水泥增强的螺钉的抗拔出力与用聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)增强的螺钉的抗拔出力。我们将PMMA用作比较标准,因为它目前在临床上使用。我们的假设是,PMMA和磷酸钙骨水泥增强后的初始固定强度彼此之间没有显著差异。
在成对的人体尸体近端股骨中,对加压髋螺钉进行PMMA或磷酸钙骨水泥增强前后的拔出测试。进行双侧测试以对用于增强的材料进行成对比较,并进行重复测试以提供骨质量影响的内部对照。将用磷酸钙骨水泥增强的螺钉的初始固定与用PMMA增强的螺钉的初始固定进行比较。
将十对人体股骨(平均年龄,75±9.2岁)植入Richards AMBI加压髋螺钉。然后进行基底部截骨,产生孤立的近端骨折块用于力学测试。在位移控制下进行增强前的拔出测试,以每秒2毫米的速度持续拔出至5毫米。然后取出螺钉,并用2.0立方厘米的PMMA(一侧)或磷酸钙骨水泥(对侧)填充螺钉通道。增强后,重新插入螺钉并让骨水泥硬化24小时。增强后的测试遵循增强前测试的方案,并使用双向重复测量方差分析比较用磷酸钙骨水泥增强的螺钉的初始固定强度与用PMMA增强的螺钉的初始固定强度。
用磷酸钙骨水泥增强的螺钉的拔出行为与用PMMA增强的螺钉的拔出行为没有显著差异。使用磷酸钙骨水泥时,屈服强度增加了15.8%(从1354±632牛顿增加到1568±320牛顿);使用PMMA时,屈服强度增加了26.8%(从1477±526牛顿增加到1834±225牛顿)。然而,只有PMMA增强后的增加在p<0.05时具有统计学意义。两种增强方式下的屈服能量均显著增加(41%,p<0.05)(磷酸钙骨水泥从2399±1186牛顿·毫米增加到3378±857牛顿·毫米,PMMA从2635±1113牛顿·毫米增加到3741±426牛顿·毫米),而刚度仅在PMMA增强时略有增加(6.2%,从481±180牛顿/毫米增加到511±92牛顿/毫米),在磷酸钙骨水泥增强时略有下降(10%,从457±201牛顿/毫米下降到411±663牛顿/毫米)。
在老年松质骨中对增强加压髋螺钉进行的单周期拔出测试中,本研究中研究的原位固化磷酸钙骨水泥与PMMA相比具有优势。我们的结果表明,在挽救患有复杂股骨转子间骨折的老年骨质疏松患者的加压髋螺钉固定方面,这些材料有望替代PMMA,并且有必要对其在该应用中的使用进行进一步研究。