De Pascalis Vilfredo, Chiaradia Carmela, Carotenuto Eleonora
Department of Psychology, University of Rome 'La Sapienza', Via de Marsi 78, 00185 Rome, Italy.
Pain. 2002 Apr;96(3):393-402. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00485-7.
This study reports how placebo analgesia was produced by conditioning whereby the intensity of electric stimulation was surreptitiously reduced in order to examine the contribution of psychological factors of suggestibility and expectancy on placebo analgesia. This strategy was used in order to manipulate expectancy for pain reduction. The magnitudes of the placebo effects were estimated after a manipulation procedure and during experimental trials in which stimulus intensities were reset to original baseline levels. Individual differences in suggestibility, verbal expectancy for drug efficacy and manipulation procedure for pain reduction were tested as possible mediators of placebo analgesia. The following dependent variables were measured: (a) subjective expectancy for drug efficacy in pain relief, (b) expected pain intensity and unpleasantness, (c) concurrent pain intensity and unpleasantness and (d) remembered pain intensity and unpleasantness. Statistically significant placebo effects on sensory and affective measures of pain were obtained independently of the extent of the surreptitious lowering of stimulus strength during manipulation trials. The pairing of placebo administration with painful stimulation was sufficient to produce a generalized placebo analgesic effect. However, verbal expectancy for drug efficacy and individual differences in suggestibility were found to contribute significantly to the magnitude of placebo analgesia. The highest placebo effect was shown by the most pronounced reductions in pain ratings in highly suggestible subjects who received suggestions presumed to elicit high expectancy for drug efficacy. The results also demonstrated that placebo effects established on remembered pain were at least twice as great as those obtained on concurrent placebo effects. This was mainly because baseline pain was remembered as being much more intense than it really was. Moreover, remembered placebo effects, like the concurrent placebo effects, were highly correlated with expected pain scores obtained just after manipulation trials. These results indicate that multiple factors contribute to the placebo effect, including suggestibility, expectancy and conditioning, and that the judgement of placebo analgesia is critically determined by whether pain relief is assessed concurrently or after treatment.
本研究报告了通过条件作用产生安慰剂镇痛的方式,即暗中降低电刺激强度,以检验暗示性和预期等心理因素对安慰剂镇痛的作用。采用这一策略是为了操控对疼痛减轻的预期。在一个操控程序之后以及实验试验期间(此时刺激强度重新设定为原始基线水平),对安慰剂效应的大小进行了评估。对暗示性的个体差异、对药物疗效的言语预期以及疼痛减轻的操控程序进行了测试,作为安慰剂镇痛可能的中介因素。测量了以下因变量:(a) 对药物缓解疼痛疗效的主观预期,(b) 预期疼痛强度和不适感,(c) 同时出现的疼痛强度和不适感,以及 (d) 记忆中的疼痛强度和不适感。在操控试验期间,无论刺激强度暗中降低的程度如何,均获得了对疼痛的感觉和情感测量指标具有统计学显著意义的安慰剂效应。安慰剂给药与疼痛刺激的配对足以产生普遍的安慰剂镇痛效应。然而,发现对药物疗效的言语预期和暗示性的个体差异对安慰剂镇痛的大小有显著贡献。在接受被认为能引发对药物疗效高预期的暗示的高暗示性受试者中,疼痛评分的最显著降低显示出最高的安慰剂效应。结果还表明,基于记忆疼痛建立的安慰剂效应至少是同时出现的安慰剂效应的两倍。这主要是因为记忆中的基线疼痛比实际情况要强烈得多。此外,与同时出现的安慰剂效应一样,记忆中的安慰剂效应与操控试验刚结束时获得的预期疼痛评分高度相关。这些结果表明,多种因素促成了安慰剂效应,包括暗示性、预期和条件作用,并且安慰剂镇痛的判断关键取决于疼痛缓解是在治疗期间还是治疗后进行评估。