Boon P, Vonck K, Van Walleghem P, D'Havé M, Caemaert J, De Reuck J
Epilepsy Monitoring Unit, Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Belgium.
Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2002;79:93-8. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-6105-0_21.
Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) by intermittent and programmed electrical stimulation of the left vagus nerve in the neck, has become widely available. It is an effective treatment for patients with refractory epilepsy. Patients can be provided with a magnet that allows to deliver additional stimulation trains. Since earlier studies have demonstrated the persistence of a stimulation effect after discontinuation of the stimulation train, we evaluated the clinical efficacy of VNS both in the programmed intermittent stimulation mode and magnet stimulation mode.
A group of 30 patients (16 F, 14 M) with medically refractory partial epilepsy, who were unsuitable candidates for resective surgery, were included in the study. The patients, their companions and caregivers were instructed on how to administer additional stimulation trains using a hand-held magnet when an aura or a seizure onset occurred. Patients or caregivers could recognize habitual seizures and were able to evaluate sudden interruption of these seizures. Using seizure diaries, detailed accounts of magnet use and regular clinic follow-up visits, data on seizure frequency and severity and number of magnet applications were collected. Patients who provided unreliable information were excluded from the analysis.
Forty-seven percent of all patients had an improvement in seizure control with a reduction in seizure frequency of more than 50% during a mean follow-up of 33 months (range: 4-67 months). More than half of the patients used the magnet and provided reliable information. In 63% of patients who were able to self-administer or receive additional magnet stimulation, seizures could be interrupted, be it consistently or occasionally. More than half of the patients who reported a positive effect of magnet stimulation became responders. In most cases the magnet was applied by a caregiver.
To our knowledge, this study is the first to explore the efficacy of magnet-induced vagus nerve stimulation. Results suggest that the magnet is a useful tool that provides patients and mainly caregivers with an additional means of controlling refractory seizures. Additional controlled studies comparing programmed stimulation and magnet-induced stimulation in monitoring conditions are warranted.
通过对颈部左侧迷走神经进行间歇性和程序性电刺激来实现迷走神经刺激(VNS),这种方法已广泛应用。它是治疗难治性癫痫患者的一种有效方法。可为患者提供一块磁铁,用于进行额外的刺激序列。由于早期研究已证明在刺激序列停止后刺激效果仍会持续,我们评估了VNS在程序性间歇性刺激模式和磁铁刺激模式下的临床疗效。
一组30例(16例女性,14例男性)药物难治性部分性癫痫患者被纳入研究,这些患者不适合进行切除性手术。对患者、其同伴和护理人员进行指导,告知他们在先兆或癫痫发作开始时如何使用手持磁铁进行额外的刺激序列。患者或护理人员能够识别习惯性癫痫发作,并能够评估这些发作的突然中断情况。通过癫痫日记、磁铁使用的详细记录以及定期的门诊随访,收集癫痫发作频率、严重程度和磁铁应用次数的数据。提供不可靠信息的患者被排除在分析之外。
在平均33个月(范围:4 - 67个月)的随访期间,47%的患者癫痫控制情况有所改善,癫痫发作频率降低了50%以上。超过半数的患者使用了磁铁并提供了可靠信息。在能够自行进行或接受额外磁铁刺激的患者中,63%的患者癫痫发作能够被中断,无论是持续中断还是偶尔中断。报告磁铁刺激有积极效果的患者中,超过半数成为了反应者。在大多数情况下,磁铁由护理人员使用。
据我们所知,本研究是首次探索磁铁诱发迷走神经刺激疗效的研究。结果表明,磁铁是一种有用的工具,为患者尤其是护理人员提供了一种额外控制难治性癫痫发作的方法。有必要进行更多对照研究,比较在监测条件下的程序性刺激和磁铁诱发刺激。