• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[面向问题的临床记录的逻辑结构。一种波普尔-贝叶斯相结合的方法]

[Logical structure of the problem oriented clinical record. A combined Popper-Bayes approach].

作者信息

Malavasi Antonello, Realdi Giuseppe

机构信息

Istituto di Clinica Medica Generale e Terapia Medica, Università degli Studi di Sassari.

出版信息

Ann Ital Med Int. 2002 Jan-Mar;17(1):21-30.

PMID:11975111
Abstract

The problem-oriented medical record is a tool whose correct compilation meets the requirements of the law as well as the need for continuing medical education within the logic of clinical decision making. The reading of the contents of a record allows people to evaluate the correspondence between the "thinking" and the "doing" of a doctor, as well the objectivity of the facts--that is, the truth related to the reasons for a patient's admission to hospital and the nature of his or her illness. To this aim, the authors suggest a structural logical iter in concordance with the lines of hypothetical-deductive epistemology, in contrast to inductive epistemology, as tradition has always suggested. The latter, in fact, proposes to start from singular observations and proceeding, by successive steps, towards a diagnosis. It thus neglects to take error into consideration, and therefore the differential diagnostic process, and ignores the fact that one cannot pass from single descriptions to universal (diagnostic) laws on the basis of logic. The process of falsification therefore plays a central role in the diagnostic procedure and thus in the construction of the medical record. This falsification process is centered, according to the most recent epistemology, on the logical schemes of Popper-Hempel and Bayes. The authors propose an integrated combination of both schemes to enable a correct approach to diagnostic hypothesis and to differential diagnosis, with their relevant legal, didactic and administrative repercussions.

摘要

问题导向型医疗记录是一种工具,其正确编制既符合法律要求,又满足临床决策逻辑中继续医学教育的需求。阅读一份记录的内容能让人们评估医生“思考”与“行动”之间的一致性,以及事实的客观性,即与患者入院原因及病情性质相关的真相。为此,作者们建议采用一种与假设 - 演绎认识论思路相一致的结构性逻辑迭代,这与传统一直倡导的归纳认识论不同。事实上,归纳认识论建议从个别观察出发,逐步推进以得出诊断。它因此忽略了对错误的考虑,进而忽略了鉴别诊断过程,并且忽视了一个事实,即基于逻辑,人们无法从单一描述过渡到普遍(诊断)规律。因此,证伪过程在诊断程序以及医疗记录的构建中起着核心作用。根据最新的认识论,这个证伪过程以波普尔 - 亨佩尔和贝叶斯的逻辑模式为核心。作者们提议将这两种模式进行综合结合,以便能正确处理诊断假设和鉴别诊断,并顾及它们在法律、教学和管理方面的相关影响。

相似文献

1
[Logical structure of the problem oriented clinical record. A combined Popper-Bayes approach].[面向问题的临床记录的逻辑结构。一种波普尔-贝叶斯相结合的方法]
Ann Ital Med Int. 2002 Jan-Mar;17(1):21-30.
2
[Logical structure of problem-oriented clinical record. A combined Popper-Bayes approach].[以问题为导向的临床记录的逻辑结构。一种波普尔 - 贝叶斯相结合的方法]
Ann Ital Med Int. 2002 Apr-Jun;17(2):130-1.
3
[Popper and the problem of induction in epidemiology].[波普尔与流行病学中的归纳问题]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2000 Jul-Aug;74(4):327-39.
4
[The logic of differential diagnosis].[鉴别诊断的逻辑]
Ann Ital Med Int. 2001 Jan-Mar;16(1):17-25.
5
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
6
Selection of diagnostic tests for clinical decision making and translation to a problem oriented medical record.为临床决策选择诊断测试并转化为问题导向型病历。
Clin Chim Acta. 2008 Jul 1;393(1):37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2008.03.024. Epub 2008 Mar 27.
7
Evidence-based medical decision making: deductive versus inductive logical thinking.基于证据的医学决策:演绎逻辑思维与归纳逻辑思维
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Jun;11(6):670-1.
8
Perspective: Whither the problem list? Organ-based documentation and deficient synthesis by medical trainees.观点:问题清单何去何从?以器官为基础的文档记录和医学实习生的综合能力不足。
Acad Med. 2010 Oct;85(10):1578-82. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181f06c67.
9
The problem-oriented optometric record.以问题为导向的验光记录。
J Am Optom Assoc. 1979 Aug;50(8):915-8.
10
[Note on the epistemology of clinical pharmacology: comparison with the approach of Karl Popper].[临床药理学认识论笔记:与卡尔·波普尔方法的比较]
Therapie. 1999 Jan-Feb;54(1):67-73.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and evaluation of a Health Record Online Submission Tool (HOST).健康记录在线提交工具(HOST)的开发与评估。
Med Educ Online. 2010 Oct 19;15. doi: 10.3402/meo.v15i0.5350.
2
A landmark for popperian epidemiology: refutation of the randomised Aldactone evaluation study.波普尔式流行病学的一个里程碑:对安体舒通随机评估研究的驳斥。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 Nov;59(11):1000-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.031633.
3
Overcoming structural constraints to patient utilization of electronic medical records: a critical review and proposal for an evaluation framework.
克服患者使用电子病历的结构限制:一项批判性综述及评估框架提案
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004 Mar-Apr;11(2):151-61. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1274. Epub 2003 Nov 21.