Suppr超能文献

克服患者使用电子病历的结构限制:一项批判性综述及评估框架提案

Overcoming structural constraints to patient utilization of electronic medical records: a critical review and proposal for an evaluation framework.

作者信息

Winkelman Warren J, Leonard Kevin J

机构信息

Centre for Global eHealth Innovation, University Health Network, Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2C4.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004 Mar-Apr;11(2):151-61. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1274. Epub 2003 Nov 21.

Abstract

There are constraints embedded in medical record structure that limit use by patients in self-directed disease management. Through systematic review of the literature from a critical perspective, four characteristics that either enhance or mitigate the influence of medical record structure on patient utilization of an electronic patient record (EPR) system have been identified: environmental pressures, physician centeredness, collaborative organizational culture, and patient centeredness. An evaluation framework is proposed for use when considering adaptation of existing EPR systems for online patient access. Exemplars of patient-accessible EPR systems from the literature are evaluated utilizing the framework. From this study, it appears that traditional information system research and development methods may not wholly capture many pertinent social issues that arise when expanding access of EPR systems to patients. Critically rooted methods such as action research can directly inform development strategies so that these systems may positively influence health outcomes.

摘要

病历结构中存在一些限制因素,阻碍了患者在自我导向的疾病管理中对其的使用。通过从批判性视角对文献进行系统回顾,已确定了四个增强或减轻病历结构对患者使用电子病历(EPR)系统影响的特征:环境压力、以医生为中心、协作性组织文化和以患者为中心。本文提出了一个评估框架,供在考虑将现有EPR系统调整为供患者在线访问时使用。利用该框架对文献中患者可访问的EPR系统实例进行了评估。从这项研究来看,传统的信息系统研发方法可能无法完全涵盖在扩大EPR系统对患者的访问范围时出现的许多相关社会问题。诸如行动研究等具有批判性根源的方法可以直接为发展战略提供信息,以便这些系统能够对健康结果产生积极影响。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

6
Personal health records for patients with chronic disease: a major opportunity.慢性病患者的个人健康记录:一个重大机遇。
Appl Clin Inform. 2014 Apr 23;5(2):416-29. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2014-01-RA-0002. eCollection 2014.
10
A model for evaluating interface terminologies.一种评估接口术语的模型。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008 Jan-Feb;15(1):65-76. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2506. Epub 2007 Oct 18.

本文引用的文献

2
Evaluating computerised health information systems: opportunities were missed.
BMJ. 2003 Jul 19;327(7407):162-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7407.162-b.
8
Action research: politics, ethics and participation.行动研究:政治、伦理与参与
J Adv Nurs. 2002 Dec;40(5):587-93. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02416.x.
10
Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of action research.评估行动研究的优缺点。
Nurs Stand. 2001;15(26):33-5. doi: 10.7748/ns2001.03.15.26.33.c2994.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验