Whiting M F, Carpenter J C, Wheeler Q D, Wheeler W C
Department of Zoology and M. L. Bean Life Science Museum, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602, USA.
Syst Biol. 1997 Mar;46(1):1-68. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/46.1.1.
Phylogenetic relationships among the holometabolous insect orders were inferred from cladistic analysis of nucleotide sequences of 18S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) (85 exemplars) and 28S rDNA (52 exemplars) and morphological characters. Exemplar outgroup taxa were Collembola (1 sequence), Archaeognatha (1), Ephemerida (1), Odonata (2), Plecoptera (2), Blattodea (1), Mantodea (1), Dermaptera (1), Orthoptera (1), Phasmatodea (1), Embioptera (1), Psocoptera (1), Phthiraptera (1), Hemiptera (4), and Thysanoptera (1). Exemplar ingroup taxa were Coleoptera: Archostemata (1), Adephaga (2), and Polyphaga (7); Megaloptera (1); Raphidioptera (1); Neuroptera (sensu stricto = Planipennia): Mantispoidea (2), Hemerobioidea (2), and Myrmeleontoidea (2); Hymenoptera: Symphyta (4) and Apocrita (19); Trichoptera: Hydropsychoidea (1) and Limnephiloidea (2); Lepidoptera: Ditrysia (3); Siphonaptera: Pulicoidea (1) and Ceratophylloidea (2); Mecoptera: Meropeidae (1), Boreidae (1), Panorpidae (1), and Bittacidae (2); Diptera: Nematocera (1), Brachycera (2), and Cyclorrhapha (1); and Strepsiptera: Corioxenidae (1), Myrmecolacidae (1), Elenchidae (1), and Stylopidae (3). We analyzed approximately 1 kilobase of 18S rDNA, starting 398 nucleotides downstream of the 5' end, and approximately 400 bp of 28S rDNA in expansion segment D3. Multiple alignment of the 18S and 28S sequences resulted in 1,116 nucleotide positions with 24 insert regions and 398 positions with 14 insert regions, respectively. All Strepsiptera and Neuroptera have large insert regions in 18S and 28S. The secondary structure of 18S insert 23 is composed of long stems that are GC rich in the basal Strepsiptera and AT rich in the more derived Strepsiptera. A matrix of 176 morphological characters was analyzed for holometabolous orders. Incongruence length difference tests indicate that the 28S + morphological data sets are incongruent but that 28S + 18S, 18S + morphology, and 28S + 18S + morphology fail to reject the hypothesis of congruence. Phylogenetic trees were generated by parsimony analysis, and clade robustness was evaluated by branch length, Bremer support, percentage of extra steps required to force paraphyly, and sensitivity analysis using the following parameters: gap weights, morphological character weights, methods of data set combination, removal of key taxa, and alignment region. The following are monophyletic under most or all combinations of parameter values: Holometabola, Polyphaga, Megaloptera + Raphidioptera, Neuroptera, Hymenoptera, Trichoptera, Lepidoptera, Amphiesmenoptera (Trichoptera + Lepidoptera), Siphonaptera, Siphonaptera + Mecoptera, Strepsiptera, Diptera, and Strepsiptera + Diptera (Halteria). Antliophora (Mecoptera + Diptera + Siphonaptera + Strepsiptera), Mecopterida (Antliophora + Amphiesmenoptera), and Hymenoptera + Mecopterida are supported in the majority of total evidence analyses. Mecoptera may be paraphyletic because Boreus is often placed as sister group to the fleas; hence, Siphonaptera may be subordinate within Mecoptera. The 18S sequences for Priacma (Coleoptera: Archostemata), Colpocaccus (Coleoptera: Adephaga), Agulla (Raphidioptera), and Corydalus (Megaloptera) are nearly identical, and Neuropterida are monophyletic only when those two beetle sequences are removed from the analysis. Coleoptera are therefore paraphyletic under almost all combinations of parameter values. Halteria and Amphiesmenoptera have high Bremer support values and long branch lengths. The data do not support placement of Strepsiptera outside of Holometabola nor as sister group to Coleoptera. We reject the notion that the monophyly of Halteria is due to long branch attraction because Strepsiptera and Diptera do not have the longest branches and there is phylogenetic congruence between molecules, across the entire parameter space, and between morphological and molecular data.
通过对18S核糖体DNA(rDNA)(85个样本)和28S rDNA(52个样本)的核苷酸序列以及形态特征进行分支分析,推断全变态昆虫目之间的系统发育关系。外群分类单元样本包括弹尾目(1个序列)、石蛃目(1个)、蜉蝣目(1个)、蜻蜓目(2个)、襀翅目(2个)、蜚蠊目(1个)、螳螂目(1个)、革翅目(1个)、直翅目(1个)、竹节虫目(1个)、纺足目(1个)、啮目(1个)、虱目(1个)、半翅目(4个)和缨翅目(1个)。内群分类单元样本包括鞘翅目:原鞘亚目(1个)、肉食亚目(2个)和多食亚目(7个);广翅目(1个);蛇蛉目(1个);脉翅目(狭义=扁翅脉翅类):螳蛉总科(2个)、草蛉总科(2个)和蚁蛉总科(2个);膜翅目:广腰亚目(4个)和细腰亚目(19个);毛翅目:水栖毛翅总科(1个)和沼石蛾总科(2个);鳞翅目:双孔亚目(3个);蚤目:蚤总科(1个)和角叶蚤总科(2个);长翅目:美蝎蛉科(1个)、雪蝎蛉科(1个)、蝎蛉科(1个)和蚊蝎蛉科(2个);双翅目:长角亚目(1个)、短角亚目(2个)和环裂亚目(1个);捻翅目:栉角捻翅科(1个)、蚁巢捻翅科(1个)、枝捻翅科(1个)和捻翅科(3个)。我们分析了18S rDNA约1千碱基,从5'端下游398个核苷酸处开始,以及28S rDNA在扩展段D3中的约400 bp。18S和28S序列的多重比对分别产生了1116个核苷酸位置,其中有24个插入区域,以及398个位置,其中有14个插入区域。所有捻翅目和脉翅目在18S和28S中都有大的插入区域。18S插入23的二级结构由长茎组成,基部捻翅目富含GC,而较进化的捻翅目富含AT。分析了全变态目的176个形态特征矩阵。不一致长度差异检验表明,28S +形态数据集不一致,但28S + 18S、18S +形态以及28S + 18S +形态未能拒绝一致性假设。通过简约分析生成系统发育树,并通过分支长度、布雷默支持值、强制并系所需额外步骤的百分比以及使用以下参数的敏感性分析来评估分支稳健性:空位权重、形态特征权重、数据集组合方法、关键分类单元的去除以及比对区域。在大多数或所有参数值组合下,以下分类单元是单系的:全变态类、多食亚目、广翅目+蛇蛉目、脉翅目、膜翅目、毛翅目、鳞翅目、两栖翅类(毛翅目+鳞翅目)、蚤目、蚤目+长翅目、捻翅目、双翅目以及捻翅目+双翅目(摇蚊科)。在大多数总证据分析中,长翅目总科(长翅目+双翅目+蚤目+捻翅目)、长翅目总目(长翅目总科+两栖翅类)以及膜翅目+长翅目总目得到支持。长翅目可能是并系的,因为雪蝎蛉科经常被置于跳蚤的姐妹群位置;因此,蚤目可能从属于长翅目。原鞘亚目(鞘翅目:原鞘亚目)、沟胸隐翅虫属(鞘翅目:肉食亚目)、阿古拉属(蛇蛉目)和鱼蛉属(广翅目)的18S序列几乎相同,并且只有在从分析中去除这两个甲虫序列时,脉翅总目才是单系的。因此,在几乎所有参数值组合下,鞘翅目都是并系的。摇蚊科和两栖翅类具有较高的布雷默支持值和长分支长度。数据不支持将捻翅目置于全变态类之外,也不支持将其作为鞘翅目的姐妹群。我们拒绝摇蚊科单系性是由于长分支吸引的观点,因为捻翅目和双翅目没有最长的分支,并且在整个参数空间内分子之间、形态和分子数据之间存在系统发育一致性。