Suppr超能文献

无症状健康个体中11种肺炎衣原体特异性免疫球蛋白G商业检测方法的比较。

Comparison of eleven commercial tests for Chlamydia pneumoniae-specific immunoglobulin G in asymptomatic healthy individuals.

作者信息

Hermann Corinna, Graf Kathrin, Groh Annemarie, Straube Eberhard, Hartung Thomas

机构信息

Biochemical Pharmacology, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2002 May;40(5):1603-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.5.1603-1609.2002.

Abstract

The seroprevalence of anti-Chlamydia pneumoniae-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies is high in the adult population. Experience is required to perform a microimmunofluorescence test (MIF), the current "gold standard" for serological diagnosis, and the assay still lacks standardization. Partially automated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and enzyme immunoassays (EIAs), which are more standardized and for which the reading of results is less subjective, have been developed. The different commercially available serological tests differ in their sensitivities and specificities, depending primarily on the antigen used. Therefore, we evaluated 11 different tests (10 were species specific, 1 was genus specific) for IgG antibodies using serum samples of 80 apparently healthy volunteers. The interpretation of the results was based on the results of the gold standard, MIF: a sample was judged positive if it was positive by at least three of the four different MIFs. Based on this internal standard, we found that 71% of the samples were positive, while 8% were false positive by some tests. The correlations between the results of the different MIFs ranged from 83 to 99%, and the correlations between the results of the MIFs and the different ELISAs and EIAs ranged from 78 to 98%. Comparison of the IgG titers measured by MIF showed good agreement (r = 0.76 to 0.91). This analysis revealed that some ELISAs and EIAs fail to detect low IgG titers. The specificities of the species-specific tests varied from 95 to 100%, and the sensitivities varied from 58 to 100%. These results indicate that serological assays for the detection of anti-C. pneumoniae-specific IgG vary greatly in their sensitivities and specificities. MIF must still be considered the best method for the detection of IgG in apparently healthy subjects, but the sensitivities and specificities of new ELISAs approximate those of MIFs.

摘要

在成年人群中,抗肺炎衣原体特异性免疫球蛋白G(IgG)抗体的血清阳性率较高。进行微量免疫荧光试验(MIF)(目前血清学诊断的“金标准”)需要经验,并且该检测方法仍缺乏标准化。已经开发出了部分自动化的酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)和酶免疫测定(EIA),它们更具标准化,结果判读的主观性也较小。不同的市售血清学检测在敏感性和特异性方面存在差异,这主要取决于所使用的抗原。因此,我们使用80名看似健康的志愿者的血清样本,评估了11种不同的针对IgG抗体的检测方法(10种是种特异性的,1种是属特异性的)。结果的判读基于金标准MIF的结果:如果一个样本在四种不同的MIF中至少有三种呈阳性,则判定为阳性。基于这个内部标准,我们发现71%的样本呈阳性,而8%的样本在某些检测中出现假阳性。不同MIF结果之间的相关性在83%至99%之间,MIF结果与不同ELISA和EIA结果之间的相关性在78%至98%之间。通过MIF测量的IgG滴度比较显示出良好的一致性(r = 0.76至0.91)。该分析表明,一些ELISA和EIA无法检测到低IgG滴度。种特异性检测的特异性在95%至100%之间,敏感性在58%至100%之间。这些结果表明,用于检测抗肺炎衣原体特异性IgG的血清学检测在敏感性和特异性方面差异很大。MIF仍然必须被认为是在看似健康的受试者中检测IgG的最佳方法,但新ELISA的敏感性和特异性接近MIF。

相似文献

4
A preliminary evaluation of a new enzyme immunoassay to detect Chlamydia pneumoniae-specific antibodies.
J Microbiol Methods. 2000 Dec 15;43(2):117-25. doi: 10.1016/s0167-7012(00)00220-7.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
Chlamydia pneumoniae exposure and inflammatory markers in acute coronary syndrome (CIMACS).
Am J Cardiol. 2001 Aug 1;88(3):214-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)01628-9.
5
Chlamydia pneumoniae infection of the central nervous system.肺炎衣原体中枢神经系统感染。
Curr Opin Neurol. 2001 Jun;14(3):355-9. doi: 10.1097/00019052-200106000-00015.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验