Konrad K, Gauggel S, Manz A, Schöll M
Technical University of Aachen, Clinics for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, RWTH Aachen, Neuen-hofer Weg 21, D-52074 Aachen, Germany.
Child Neuropsychol. 2000 Dec;6(4):286-96. doi: 10.1076/chin.6.4.286.3145.
Recent research has demonstrated that both brain-injured children and children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) suffer from response inhibition deficits. To investigate whether these deficits can be influenced by motivational factors, the stop-signal task was performed with and without reward contingencies for successful inhibition. Three groups of children between 8 and 12 years of age, participated in the study: 31 children with ADHD, 37 with traumatic brain injuries (TBI), and 26 normal controls. Results indicated that, although all groups showed comparable learning effects, reward contingencies had different effects on the groups. Whereas the performance of children with ADHD under reward contingencies were brought up to the performance level of normal controls, rewards were found less effective at improving response inhibition in children with TBI. The results further support a motivational/energetic explanation of the inhibitory deficit in children with ADHD, and of a primary response inhibition deficit due to structural brain damage in children with TBI.
近期研究表明,脑损伤儿童和患有注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的儿童均存在反应抑制缺陷。为了探究这些缺陷是否会受到动机因素的影响,研究人员在有和没有成功抑制奖励条件的情况下进行了停止信号任务。三组8至12岁的儿童参与了该研究:31名患有ADHD的儿童、37名患有创伤性脑损伤(TBI)的儿童以及26名正常对照组儿童。结果表明,尽管所有组都表现出了类似的学习效果,但奖励条件对不同组产生了不同的影响。奖励条件下,ADHD儿童的表现提升至正常对照组的水平,而奖励在改善TBI儿童的反应抑制方面效果较差。这些结果进一步支持了对ADHD儿童抑制缺陷的动机/能量解释,以及对TBI儿童因脑结构损伤导致的原发性反应抑制缺陷的解释。