• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对自身性谎言的认知受到说谎者、性伴侣以及谎言本身特征的影响。

Perceptions of own sexual lies influenced by characteristics of liar, sex partner, and lie itself.

作者信息

Williams Sunyna S, Payne Gayle Holmes

机构信息

Department of Community Health, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1206 South Fourth Street, Champaign, Illinois 61820, USA.

出版信息

J Sex Marital Ther. 2002 May-Jun;28(3):257-67. doi: 10.1080/009262302760328299.

DOI:10.1080/009262302760328299
PMID:11995604
Abstract

The current study examined perceptions of own sexual lies (lies to sex partners about sexual matters), in particular the perceived acceptability and seriousness of such lies, as well as potential determinants of such perceptions. Participants were 166 undergraduates who were asked to recall a recent event in which he or she had engaged in sexual lying and then respond to several questions regarding the event. Results showed that those who recalled relatively risk-relevant and self-protective sexual lies saw their lies as more serious and less acceptable. Moreover, those who told relatively risk-irrelevant and other-protective sexual lies reported less history of sexual lying or infidelity and more liking for the lie recipient in the event. These findings have implications both for safer-sex interventions and for interventions in intimate relationships.

摘要

当前的研究考察了对自身性谎言(向性伴侣隐瞒性相关事宜)的认知,尤其是此类谎言的可接受程度和严重程度,以及这些认知的潜在决定因素。参与者为166名本科生,他们被要求回忆最近一次自己进行性欺骗的事件,然后回答几个关于该事件的问题。结果显示,那些回忆起与风险相关且自我保护性质的性谎言的人,认为自己的谎言更严重且更不可接受。此外,那些讲述与风险无关且保护他人性质的性谎言的人,报告的性欺骗或不忠历史较少,且在该事件中对谎言接受者的好感度更高。这些发现对安全性行为干预以及亲密关系干预均具有启示意义。

相似文献

1
Perceptions of own sexual lies influenced by characteristics of liar, sex partner, and lie itself.对自身性谎言的认知受到说谎者、性伴侣以及谎言本身特征的影响。
J Sex Marital Ther. 2002 May-Jun;28(3):257-67. doi: 10.1080/009262302760328299.
2
Sexual deception as a social-exchange process: development of a behavior-based sexual deception scale.作为一种社会交换过程的性欺骗:基于行为的性欺骗量表的编制
J Sex Res. 2008 Jan-Mar;45(1):27-35. doi: 10.1080/00224490701596176.
3
Papa Don't Preach? : Using Lies to Expose the Truth about Who Suppresses Female Sexuality.爸爸别说教?:用谎言揭露谁在压制女性性行为的真相。
Hum Nat. 2020 Sep;31(3):222-248. doi: 10.1007/s12110-020-09372-7.
4
Lying in everyday life.日常生活中的谎言。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 May;70(5):979-95.
5
Everyday lies in close and casual relationships.日常存在于亲密且随意的关系之中。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Jan;74(1):63-79. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.74.1.63.
6
Infidelity in Dating Relationships: Gender-Specific Correlates of Face-to-Face and Online Extradyadic Involvement.约会关系中的不忠行为:面对面和网络上的婚外情在性别上的相关因素
Arch Sex Behav. 2016 Jan;45(1):193-205. doi: 10.1007/s10508-015-0576-3. Epub 2015 Jul 21.
7
Perceptions of partner's deception in friends with benefits relationships.伴侣在互惠型朋友关系中的欺骗感知。
J Sex Marital Ther. 2014;40(1):43-57. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2012.668513. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
8
American and Korean Perceptions of Sex Differences in Deception.美国人和韩国人对欺骗中性别差异的认知。
Evol Psychol. 2020 Apr;18(2):1474704920916455. doi: 10.1177/1474704920916455.
9
Who lies?谁在说谎?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 May;70(5):1037-51.
10
Sociosexuality, Commitment, Sexual Infidelity, and Perceptions of Infidelity: Data From the Second Love Web Site.社交性行为、承诺、性不忠及对不忠行为的认知:来自第二个爱情网站的数据。
J Sex Res. 2017 Feb;54(2):241-253. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2016.1145182. Epub 2016 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of the sexual agreement investment scale.性协议投资量表的编制与验证。
J Sex Res. 2010 Jan;47(1):24-37. doi: 10.1080/00224490902916017.