Deshpande L M, Fix A M, Pfaller M A, Jones R N
The JONES Group/JMI Laboratories, North Liberty, IA, USA.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2002 Apr;42(4):283-90. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(01)00328-5.
Staphylococci cause one-third of all serious invasive infections in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program including bacteremias and lower respiratory tract infections. Staphylococci are also commensals of the skin and nasal passages; therefore, topical agents active against these organisms are valuable in preventing infections or transfer of the organisms between patients and/or health care workers. Mupirocin is a potent topical anti-staphylococcal compound, but its effectiveness has been compromised by emerging resistance. In early 2000, the SENTRY Program detected 302 mupirocin-resistant isolates (131 Staphylococcus aureus, and 171 coagulase-negative staphylococci [CoNS]) from the United States (19/25 medical centers), Canada (4/5), Latin America (3/9) and Europe (7/18). One hundred sixty-eight mupirocin-resistant and 59 susceptible isolates were tested further by reference MIC, Etest (AB BIODISK, Solna, Sweden) and disk diffusion (5-microg) methods. Mupirocin resistance rates for blood stream infections varied by geographic area: for S. aureus from 1.9 to 5.6%, and for CoNS from 12.8 to 39.9%. Using elevated mupirocin MIC results, two resistant populations were noted: low-level resistance at 8-128 microg/mL and high-level resistance at > or = 1024 microg/mL. Acceptable correlation was observed between Etest and disk diffusion results (r = 0.84) without serious intermethod interpretive errors. High-level resistant isolates had heavy growth with no visible zone around the disk; low-level resistant isolates produced hazy zones of inhibition, and susceptible strains had clear zones of inhibition at > or = 17 mm. As mupirocin resistance can be plasmid-mediated, the prudent and appropriate use of this topical agent is important to minimize the ongoing development of resistance. Local surveillance for emerging mupirocin resistance appears warranted particularly in the United States and Canada, pragmatically using a disk diffusion test screening. Where more precise data are needed, the Etest is a very accurate method for distinguishing mupirocin low-level from high-level resistance patterns.
葡萄球菌在哨兵抗菌监测项目中导致了三分之一的严重侵袭性感染,包括菌血症和下呼吸道感染。葡萄球菌也是皮肤和鼻腔通道的共生菌;因此,对这些微生物有效的局部用药对于预防感染或在患者和/或医护人员之间传播这些微生物具有重要价值。莫匹罗星是一种有效的局部抗葡萄球菌化合物,但其有效性已因新出现的耐药性而受到影响。2000年初,哨兵项目从美国(25个医疗中心中的19个)、加拿大(5个中的4个)、拉丁美洲(9个中的3个)和欧洲(18个中的7个)检测到302株耐莫匹罗星菌株(131株金黄色葡萄球菌和171株凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌[CoNS])。通过参考微量肉汤稀释法、Etest(AB BIODISK,瑞典索尔纳)和纸片扩散法(5μg)对168株耐莫匹罗星菌株和59株敏感菌株进行了进一步检测。血流感染的莫匹罗星耐药率因地理区域而异:金黄色葡萄球菌为1.9%至5.6%,凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌为12.8%至39.9%。根据莫匹罗星的微量肉汤稀释法结果升高,发现了两个耐药群体:8至128μg/mL的低水平耐药和≥1024μg/mL的高水平耐药。观察到Etest和纸片扩散法结果之间具有良好的相关性(r = 0.84),且没有严重的方法间解释误差。高水平耐药菌株生长旺盛,纸片周围无可见抑菌圈;低水平耐药菌株产生模糊的抑菌圈,敏感菌株在≥17mm处有清晰的抑菌圈。由于莫匹罗星耐药性可能是由质粒介导的,谨慎且适当地使用这种局部用药对于尽量减少耐药性的持续发展很重要。特别是在美国和加拿大,通过实用的纸片扩散试验筛查,对新出现的莫匹罗星耐药性进行局部监测似乎是必要的。在需要更精确数据的地方,Etest是区分莫匹罗星低水平和高水平耐药模式的非常准确的方法。