Palepou M F, Johnson A P, Cookson B D, Beattie H, Charlett A, Woodford N
Laboratory of Hospital Infection, Central Public Health Laboratory, London, UK.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1998 Nov;42(5):577-83. doi: 10.1093/jac/42.5.577.
The susceptibilities to mupirocin of 102 selected clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and of control strain S. aureus NCTC 6571 were determined by disc diffusion (using discs containing 5, 15, 25, 30, 50 and 200 microg of mupirocin) and Etest and the results were compared with MICs determined using an agar incorporation method. On the basis of agar incorporation MICs, 42 isolates were sensitive to mupirocin (MIC < or = 4 mg/L), 39 showed low-level resistance (MICs = 8-128 mg/L) and 22 were highly resistant (MICs > or = 256 mg/L) and contained the mupA resistance gene. Using Stokes' criteria, none of the discs used gave major errors (sensitive isolates classified as highly resistant) or very major errors (highly resistant isolates classified as sensitive) in assigning a category of susceptibility, but minor errors (a difference of one category) were noted with all strengths. The best correlation with agar incorporation MIC was obtained with 25 microg mupirocin discs, which classified correctly 98 (95%) isolates, while worse correlations were noted with 5 microg and 200 microg discs which are the only types currently available commercially, for which there were 47 and 30 minor errors, respectively. The MICs found by Etest were the same as, or lower than, those determined by agar incorporation. Etests classified correctly all 42 mupirocin-sensitive isolates, 19 (49%) low-level resistant isolates and 16 (73%) highly resistant isolates. Two isolates that contained the mupA gene and showed agar incorporation MICs of 256 mg/L and 512 mg/L were not classified as highly resistant by any of the diffusion methods used. Agar incorporation MIC determination, possibly supported by detection of the mupA gene, offers the most effective means of identifying high-level mupirocin resistance in S. aureus, although the Etest also proved to be reproducible. However, we conclude that 25 microg discs warrant further evaluation for possible use in clinical laboratories, as they appear to be more reliable than the discs currently available.
采用纸片扩散法(使用含5、15、25、30、50和200微克莫匹罗星的纸片)和Etest法,测定了102株挑选出的金黄色葡萄球菌临床分离株及对照菌株金黄色葡萄球菌NCTC 6571对莫匹罗星的敏感性,并将结果与采用琼脂掺入法测定的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)进行比较。根据琼脂掺入法测定的MIC,42株分离株对莫匹罗星敏感(MIC≤4毫克/升),39株表现为低水平耐药(MIC为8 - 128毫克/升),22株为高水平耐药(MIC≥256毫克/升)且含有mupA耐药基因。使用斯托克斯标准,在所使用的纸片中,没有一个在判定敏感性类别时出现主要错误(敏感分离株被分类为高水平耐药)或非常主要错误(高水平耐药分离株被分类为敏感),但所有浓度的纸片均出现了次要错误(相差一个类别)。与琼脂掺入法MIC相关性最好的是含25微克莫匹罗星的纸片,其正确分类了98株(95%)分离株,而与目前仅有的市售类型的5微克和200微克纸片的相关性较差,分别有47个和30个次要错误。通过Etest法测得的MIC与琼脂掺入法测定的结果相同或更低。Etest法正确分类了所有42株对莫匹罗星敏感的分离株、19株(49%)低水平耐药分离株和16株(73%)高水平耐药分离株。两株含有mupA基因且琼脂掺入法MIC为256毫克/升和512毫克/升的分离株,在所使用的任何扩散法中均未被分类为高水平耐药。琼脂掺入法测定MIC,可能辅以mupA基因检测,是鉴定金黄色葡萄球菌中莫匹罗星高水平耐药最有效的方法,尽管Etest法也被证明具有可重复性。然而,我们得出结论,25微克的纸片值得进一步评估其在临床实验室中可能的应用,因为它们似乎比目前可用的纸片更可靠。