Schober Edith, Schoenle Eugen, Van Dyk Jacobus, Wernicke-Panten Karin
University Children's Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2002 Apr;15(4):369-76. doi: 10.1515/jpem.2002.15.4.369.
The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of insulin glargine, a long-acting insulin analog, with NPH insulin in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). In a multicenter, open-label, randomized, 6-month study, 349 patients with TIDM, aged 5-16 years, received insulin glargine once daily or NPH insulin either once or twice daily, based on their prior treatment regimen. Although there was no significant difference between the NPH insulin and insulin glargine treatment groups with respect to baseline to endpoint change in HbA1c levels, fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels decreased significantly more in the insulin glargine group (-1.29 mmol/l) than in the NPH insulin group (-0.68 mmol/L, p = 0.02). The percentage of symptomatic hypoglycemic events was similar between groups; however, fewer patients in the insulin glargine group reported severe hypoglycemia (23% vs 29%) and severe nocturnal hypoglycemia (13% vs 18%), although these differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.22 and p = 0.19, respectively). Fewer serious adverse events occurred in the insulin glargine group than in the NPH insulin group (p < 0.02). A once-daily subcutaneous dose of insulin glargine provides effective glycemic control and is well tolerated in children and adolescents with T1DM.
本研究的目的是比较长效胰岛素类似物甘精胰岛素与中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素(NPH胰岛素)在1型糖尿病(T1DM)儿童和青少年中的疗效和安全性。在一项多中心、开放标签、随机、为期6个月的研究中,349例年龄在5至16岁的T1DM患者根据其先前的治疗方案,每日一次接受甘精胰岛素治疗,或每日一次或两次接受NPH胰岛素治疗。尽管NPH胰岛素治疗组和甘精胰岛素治疗组在糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平从基线到终点的变化方面没有显著差异,但甘精胰岛素组的空腹血糖(FBG)水平显著下降得更多(-1.29 mmol/l),而NPH胰岛素组为(-0.68 mmol/L,p = 0.02)。有症状低血糖事件的发生率在两组之间相似;然而,甘精胰岛素组报告严重低血糖(23%对29%)和严重夜间低血糖(13%对18%)的患者较少,尽管这些差异无统计学意义(分别为p = 0.22和p = 0.19)。甘精胰岛素组发生的严重不良事件比NPH胰岛素组少(p < 0.02)。每日一次皮下注射甘精胰岛素可有效控制血糖,且T1DM儿童和青少年对其耐受性良好。