Heydecke Guido, Butz Frank, Hussein Amr, Strub Jörg R
Department of Biological and Materials Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Apr;87(4):438-45. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.123849.
Prefabricated metal and ceramic posts can be used with direct or indirect cores as an alternative to the conventional cast post and core. It is unclear how the fracture strength of zirconia posts with composite or ceramic cores and titanium posts with composite cores compares to the fracture strength of gold posts and cores after dynamic loading.
This study compared the fracture strength of endodontically treated, crowned maxillary incisors with limited ferrule length and different post-and-core systems after fatigue loading.
Sixty-four caries-free, human maxillary central incisors were divided into 4 groups. After root canal treatment, Group 1 was restored with titanium posts and composite cores, Group 2 with zirconia posts and composite cores, and Group 3 with zirconia posts and heat-pressed ceramic cores. Teeth restored with cast-on gold posts and cores served as the controls (Group 4). Teeth were prepared with a circumferential shoulder including a 1 to 2 mm ferrule; all posts were cemented with an adhesive resin cement, restored with complete-coverage crowns, and exposed to 1.2 million load cycles (30 N) in a computer-controlled chewing simulator. Simultaneous thermocycling between 5 degrees C and 55 degrees C was applied for 60 seconds with an intermediate pause of 12 seconds. All specimens that did not fracture during dynamic loading were loaded until fracture in a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1.5 mm/min; loads were applied at an angle of 130 degrees at the incisal edge. Fracture loads (N) and modes (repairable or catastrophic) were recorded. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare fracture loads among the 4 test groups. Analyses were conducted both with and without the specimens that failed during the chewing simulation. A Fisher exact test was performed to detect group differences in fracture modes. A significance level of P<.05 was used for all comparisons.
The following survival rates were recorded after the chewing simulation: 93.8% (Group 1), 93.8% (Group 2), 100% (Group 3), and 87.5% (Group 4). The median fracture strengths for Groups 1 to 4 were 450 N, 503 N, 521 N, and 408 N, respectively. No significant differences were detected among the groups. The use of zirconia posts resulted in a nonsignificant lower number of catastrophic root fractures.
Within the limitations of this study, the results suggest that zirconia posts with ceramic cores can be recommended as an alternative to cast posts and cores. If a chairside procedure is preferred, zirconia or titanium posts with composite cores can be used. Clinical trials are required to verify these in vitro results.
预制金属和陶瓷桩可与直接或间接核一起使用,作为传统铸造桩核的替代方案。目前尚不清楚复合或陶瓷核的氧化锆桩以及复合核的钛桩在动态加载后的断裂强度与金桩核的断裂强度相比如何。
本研究比较了根管治疗后、有限箍长度且不同桩核系统的上颌切牙在疲劳加载后的断裂强度。
64颗无龋的人类上颌中切牙分为4组。根管治疗后,第1组用钛桩和复合核修复,第2组用氧化锆桩和复合核修复,第3组用氧化锆桩和热压陶瓷核修复。用铸造金桩核修复的牙齿作为对照组(第4组)。制备牙齿时形成包括1至2毫米箍的圆周肩台;所有桩均用粘结树脂水门汀粘结,用全冠修复,并在计算机控制的咀嚼模拟器中承受120万次加载循环(30 N)。同时在5摄氏度和55摄氏度之间进行热循环60秒,中间停顿12秒。所有在动态加载过程中未断裂的标本在万能试验机中以1.5毫米/分钟的十字头速度加载直至断裂;在切缘处以130度角施加负荷。记录断裂负荷(N)和模式(可修复或灾难性)。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验比较4个试验组之间的断裂负荷。在有及没有在咀嚼模拟过程中失败的标本的情况下进行分析。进行Fisher精确检验以检测断裂模式的组间差异。所有比较均采用显著性水平P<0.05。
咀嚼模拟后记录的存活率如下:93.8%(第1组)、93.8%(第2组)、100%(第3组)和87.5%(第4组)。第1至4组的中位断裂强度分别为450 N、503 N、521 N和408 N。各组之间未检测到显著差异。使用氧化锆桩导致灾难性牙根骨折的数量无显著减少。
在本研究的局限性内,结果表明陶瓷核的氧化锆桩可作为铸造桩核的替代方案推荐。如果更喜欢椅旁操作,可以使用复合核的氧化锆或钛桩。需要进行临床试验来验证这些体外结果。