Merrick Mark A, Mihalyov Matthew R, Roethemeier Jennifer L, Cordova Mitchell L, Ingersoll Christopher D
Athletic Training Division, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210, USA.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2002 May;32(5):216-20. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2002.32.5.216.
A repeated-measures design was used. The independent variable was ultrasound coupling medium with 2 levels: gel pad and traditional gel. The dependent variable was peak intramuscular (IM) tissue temperature.
To compare changes in IM temperature during similar ultrasound treatments with 2 different coupling media.
Gel pads are gaining popularity as an ultrasound coupling medium. Intramuscular temperatures during ultrasound with gel pads and standard gel have not been compared.
Subjects were 13 student volunteers (21.3 +/- 1.4 years of age) without lower-extremity pathology. Ultrasound treatments were administered in a laboratory on two separate occasions 48 hours apart, each with a different coupling medium (standard ultrasound gel or gel pad). One-MHz continuous ultrasound was administered for 7 minutes at 1.5 W/cm2 with the transducer head moving 3 to 4 cm/s over an area approximately twice the size of the transducer head. Tissue temperature was measured every 10 seconds using implantable thermocouples inserted at a 3-cm depth to the surface of the right medial calf. Data were analyzed using an ANCOVA with pretreatment temperature as the covariate.
Tissue temperatures increased during both treatments, with the mean and standard deviation peak temperature during the gel pad treatment reaching 39.40 +/- 1.5 degrees C compared to 39.20 +/- 2.4 degrees C during the normal gel treatment. Statistical analysis revealed no difference in temperature between ultrasound treatments using gel and those performed using gel pads.
Because temperature changes were similar with both treatments, we conclude that these coupling methods are equivalent under the ultrasound application parameters tested.
采用重复测量设计。自变量为超声耦合介质,有两个水平:凝胶垫和传统凝胶。因变量为肌肉内(IM)组织温度峰值。
比较使用两种不同耦合介质进行类似超声治疗时IM温度的变化。
凝胶垫作为超声耦合介质越来越受欢迎。尚未比较使用凝胶垫和标准凝胶进行超声检查时的肌肉内温度。
研究对象为13名无下肢病变的学生志愿者(年龄21.3±1.4岁)。在实验室中,于48小时间隔的两个不同时间分别进行超声治疗,每次使用不同的耦合介质(标准超声凝胶或凝胶垫)。以1.5W/cm²的功率施加1MHz连续超声7分钟,换能器头以3至4cm/s的速度在一个约为换能器头面积两倍的区域上移动。使用插入右小腿内侧表面3cm深度处的植入式热电偶每10秒测量一次组织温度。数据采用以治疗前温度作为协变量的协方差分析进行分析。
两种治疗过程中组织温度均升高,凝胶垫治疗期间的平均峰值温度和标准差达到39.40±1.5℃,而正常凝胶治疗期间为39.20±2.4℃。统计分析显示,使用凝胶的超声治疗与使用凝胶垫的超声治疗之间温度无差异。
由于两种治疗的温度变化相似,我们得出结论,在所测试的超声应用参数下,这些耦合方法是等效的。